Brass
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
- Messages
- 441
I'm sure other forums like Let's Roll do the same, as well!
You just think it's the "antithesis" because we don't believe your wacky claims.
Welcome back to the LCF...
- Thread starter Ranb
- Start date
-
- Tags
- loose change forum
I'm sure other forums like Let's Roll do the same, as well!
You just think it's the "antithesis" because we don't believe your wacky claims.
Miragememories
Banned
A "truther" post in this JREF sub forum is like blood on the water for waiting sharks.
It is really quite sad because many good minds have attempted quality discussions here only to have their submissions flooded by an onslaught of garbage.
Preaching to the choir is all you have left and you have yourselves and prejudiced moderation to blame.
Lying is permitted here but is dealt with severely at LCF.
And so it should be.
MM
It is really quite sad because many good minds have attempted quality discussions here only to have their submissions flooded by an onslaught of garbage.
Preaching to the choir is all you have left and you have yourselves and prejudiced moderation to blame.
Lying is permitted here but is dealt with severely at LCF.
And so it should be.
MM
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
I'd never visited the LCF before, and I certainly didn't find anything there worth discussing.
I'd say that anybody that spends the amount of time expended there complaining about what goes on at another site should get out in the real world a bit more.
I'd say that anybody that spends the amount of time expended there complaining about what goes on at another site should get out in the real world a bit more.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
So why can "truthers" lie there and suffer no consequences?
The way a "truthers" views are treated here is very much like how they are treated in the real world. Go to most forums (for any subject) and start talking "truth", this site is far more tolerant than most. You might want to think about that.
Last edited:
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
So why can "truthers" lie there and suffer no consequences?
The way a "truthers" views are treated here is very much like how they are treated in the real world. Go to most forums (for any subject) and start talking "truth", this site is far more tolerant than most. You might want to think about that.
I belong to a (specific issue) site that will nuke any post wrt 9/11 CT's, along with any mention of infowars, prison planet or Alex Jones.
Almost anything else is openly discussed in the general issues forum subject to moderation, but no 9/11 "truth" issues.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Funny thing is, I first got acquainted with the word "truthtard" on Craiglist R&R. If you have any experience with that pit of crudity you will know anything goes (It's often very funny), just not ranting "truthers".
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
Miragememories
Banned
I thought this thread was LCF specific?
MM
MM
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
I'll bring it back - how can a site (LCF) with so little traffic serve any useful purpose?
Brass
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
- Messages
- 441
The difference here is that 99.99% of what is brought up as "evidence" has already been addressed, time and time again, yet still brought up. Is it not reasonable for people to get annoyed by that?
If I asked you what you every two minutes what your favorite food was, you obviously wouldn't get upset or annoyed, right?
Miragememories
Banned
How would you know?
How do you reach such a conclusion?
WTC7 has never been addressed by your side.
Nanothermite has never been addressed by your side.
Lots of spam and unresearched opinion posted by anonymous biased supporters of the Official Story carries no weight.
Incredulity is not an argument.
MM
NoahFence
Banned
Impressive disconnect from reality.
Both WTC 7 and nano thermite have been addressed so many times, in so many ways, it boggles the mind.
And you know it.
Both WTC 7 and nano thermite have been addressed so many times, in so many ways, it boggles the mind.
And you know it.
Last edited:
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
I see your nano, and raise to super nano.
Brass
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
- Messages
- 441
NoahFence nailed it.
If your'e going to go with "unresearched opinion posted by anonymous biased supporters of the Official Story carries no weight" then I'm going with "out of context evidence brought up by twenty-two year old college kids with mommy/daddy complexes carries no weight, either."
Seymour Butz
Muse
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 884
Earlier, you complained that members here at this forum can openly lie, and sounded like there should be punishment for doing so.
Why don't you set an example for us all right now, and show your integrity by leaving forever, rather than waiting for a banning or suspension that will never come.
Cuz those 2 lines above are indefensible lies. And you know it. Or are you just a troll?
LSSBB
Devilish Dictionarian
Sides? I thought this was about Truth. WTC7 has been endlessly discussed, and nothing yet has been raised that better explains the collapse of WTC7, as witnessed and according to evidence, than fires being the instigation. And no one has yet to explain how nanothermite could have been used on 9/11 unobserved and not leaving any clear trace. Therefore, yes it gets tiresome to hear the same arguments repeated endlessly, with so called Truth seekers who feel no need to provide real, definitive evidence to validate the conclusions they already reached from specious reasoning.
These comments are beyond bizarre. Those subjects have been flogged to death here, at length and in depth, by both sides.
A sceptic at LCF would be precluded from taking part in such discussions unless they took place specifically within the sceptics sub-forum.
The Platypus
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,883
MM says, lying is dealt with severly at LCF. Meanwhile the reality is that LCF is a forum dedicated to nothing but lying. They have no interest in reality and the truth, or even debate. It's hardly a secret that LCF, like most other 9/11 cult sites, is heavily censored by quickly banning anyone that doesn't tow the cult line.
Of course cult members never see anything wrong with anyone or anything in the cult, while everyone and everything outside the cult is seen as bad, wrong and evil. When it comes to skeptics, cults encourage this "us vs them" attitude because doubt and question is the enemy of the cult mentality.
Of course cult members never see anything wrong with anyone or anything in the cult, while everyone and everything outside the cult is seen as bad, wrong and evil. When it comes to skeptics, cults encourage this "us vs them" attitude because doubt and question is the enemy of the cult mentality.
Last edited:
The Big Dog
Unregistered
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 29,742
What in the sam hell? This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen
Well done MM, punched right through the bottom of the barrel.
Protip: LCF did not ban No Planers at the Pentagon.
The JREF is meant to be a forum where just about any idea can be debated openly. For that mission, restrictive moderation would be a problem.
However, highly restrictive moderation is not in itself a bad thing, for some forums have different missions. I am a member of a physics forum that does not allow discussion of anything that is not mainstream, established science. Even if you are a legitimate physicist trying to work out new, cutting edge physics, and you are doing it correctly, you cannot discuss it there. Discussion must be about something that is already pretty well established.
This policy is worthwhile because the main purpose of that forum is to provide education about established physics. It is not primarily a debate forum. Its mission could be obscured by discussions of unconfirmed cutting edge theories and hypotheses. Of course pseudo-science is not allowed.
I take it LCF was trying to do the same kind of thing: provide an educational forum about 9/11 issues where distractions from the issues were ruled out. The problem is that the Truth movement is laughably wrong about so many claims, so the LCF policies ended up stifling rationality (and apparently all debate, given how barren that place is now).
However, highly restrictive moderation is not in itself a bad thing, for some forums have different missions. I am a member of a physics forum that does not allow discussion of anything that is not mainstream, established science. Even if you are a legitimate physicist trying to work out new, cutting edge physics, and you are doing it correctly, you cannot discuss it there. Discussion must be about something that is already pretty well established.
This policy is worthwhile because the main purpose of that forum is to provide education about established physics. It is not primarily a debate forum. Its mission could be obscured by discussions of unconfirmed cutting edge theories and hypotheses. Of course pseudo-science is not allowed.
I take it LCF was trying to do the same kind of thing: provide an educational forum about 9/11 issues where distractions from the issues were ruled out. The problem is that the Truth movement is laughably wrong about so many claims, so the LCF policies ended up stifling rationality (and apparently all debate, given how barren that place is now).