Are you saying that atheists and evolutionists are incapable of love?

Hardcore athiests and evolutionists do make themselves incapable of love, as they get so introspective and selfish...... and that motivation opposes real love because real love is unselfish.

But no athiests and evolutionists can break out of their mind set and just yield to their inner need to love and to be loved, and eventually find out who created LOVE in the first place.

For when the Creator of LOVE fulfills their need for love, they can find it in their hearts so much easier to love others.

But some never make it. Pity they want love, they desire love but their minds STOP love. And you know one of those I am referring to....
 
Djj, why did you alter the dates concerning your end times prophecy? How does the failure of your earlier prophecy not make you a false prophet? Also, have you, in the interest of truth and honesty, amended your website so that it no longer gives an incorrect distance between Earth and moon? Have you recalculated any of your divine equations now that you have been shown so many computational errors in your proofs?
 
11168459e8cd0497bc.jpg
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=3489
 
Amen !! The religion of evolution and atheism and false skepticism is adversely hurting peoples minds so they can;t think and progress. And the religion of nationalism and churcianity so indocrinates them into war that it turns the earth into HELL. So YES, religion is dangerous but the only solution is fighting their lies with truths.

Sadly false skeptics, atheists, evolutionists, nationalists, and church people hate truths and will seldom study them.

Funny how some true believers can easily hold faith and look at the wonders of God by looking at the scientific representation of evolution, while other “true believers” turn to the Bible for cooking recipes. :blush:
 
Hardcore athiests and evolutionists do make themselves incapable of love, as they get so introspective and selfish...... and that motivation opposes real love because real love is unselfish.

But no athiests and evolutionists can break out of their mind set and just yield to their inner need to love and to be loved, and eventually find out who created LOVE in the first place.

For when the Creator of LOVE fulfills their need for love, they can find it in their hearts so much easier to love others.

But some never make it. Pity they want love, they desire love but their minds STOP love. And you know one of those I am referring to....
I'm a "hardcore" atheist, in that I'm a strong atheist. I believe that there is no god, and can prove it.

I love my girlfriend, my friends and my family, and this is unaffected by/nothing to do with my atheism. I do love and am loved. Noone created love.

Lee
 
I'm a "softcore" atheist, in that when asked to expound upon my disbelief, I use a lot of gratuitous T&A but no actual penetration.
 
I'm a "hardcore" atheist, in that I'm a strong atheist. I believe that there is no god, and can prove it.

I love my girlfriend, my friends and my family, and this is unaffected by/nothing to do with my atheism. I do love and am loved. Noone created love.

Lee

Well stated. My ability to love is affected by my disbelief in the god of Abraham about as much as it is by my disbelief in Wotan.
 
Well, that settle it then.

When will your start the Controlled Demolition on all of the mosques in the UK, then all of the churches, and then all of the stone circles?

After that, I'd like your POA & M for the burning of all religious texts and materials.

Or is this just a lot of talk?

DR
 
Well, that settle it then.

When will your start the Controlled Demolition on all of the mosques in the UK, then all of the churches, and then all of the stone circles?

After that, I'd like your POA & M for the burning of all religious texts and materials.

Or is this just a lot of talk?

DR

And what would all of that do to remove religion?
If the religious history of the UK is anything to go by taking those actions is more likely to encourage devout religious belief.

Also, this is not the logical concussion to take from this debate. i can claim that the economy would be better off without unemployment without suggesting that we gas the unemployed and "work shy".
 
Djj has "developed" a way of thinking that has absolutely no external referents at all. He denies what he doesn't like and keeps what he wants. Pure egotism.

He has absolutely no concept of what a skeptic is, scientific or philosophical. His idea of doubt is to doubt the stuff he doesn't like, but without any kind of external referent, it is just fluff and nonsense and childish selfishness. He thinks that without anything to check his nonsense against he can say anything at all and pretend he can go unchallenged. An ancient and very tired trick.

One moment he claims that love will save us, and the next he's eagerly awaiting universal armageddon. He, of course, cannot see any contradiction in this because for him there are no contradictions. Everything, even the language, is just a tool to prop up his little web of conceits (to call them lies is not strong enough). And this is precisely the danger of the kind of mind set he has fallen into, and precisely why we must be absolutely sure to ensure that we have some external referent to check our thinking against. Djj's world is an entirely internal realm - he is the absolute authority of his little private world. Fortunately, this way of thinking has been proven inefficacious - with referents to the real world.

He offers no answers because he has none. All he has is the will to wish real hard and a collections of snippets and second-rate soundbites. In his little world there are no challenges to his assertions and he is the judge of all the earth. Fortunately, the rest of the world and other people in it do not fel compelled to comply with Djj's.

Djj is a lesson to us all, an example of how one can get irrevocably lost inside an entirely private realm. Time after time he is forced to retreat from any actual discussion, tail tucked firmly between legs, into the safety and security of ill-defined meaninglessness, from whence he barks...
 
Last edited:
hmmmm, sounds like the same arguement some have used throughout history, The arguemnt of intolerence. We would be better off without religeon so lets get rid of all those that are religious and don't agree with.

**sarcasm**



ohh, and science is a religeon to and one of the most intolerent. We all know so called intellectuals are the most venemous when people disagree with them.
 
Last edited:
Hardcore athiests and evolutionists do make themselves incapable of love, as they get so introspective and selfish...... and that motivation opposes real love because real love is unselfish.

But no athiests and evolutionists can break out of their mind set and just yield to their inner need to love and to be loved, and eventually find out who created LOVE in the first place.

For when the Creator of LOVE fulfills their need for love, they can find it in their hearts so much easier to love others.

But some never make it. Pity they want love, they desire love but their minds STOP love. And you know one of those I am referring to....

Perhaps Penn said it best:
I believe that there is no God. I'm beyond atheism. Atheism is not believing in God. Not believing in God is easy -- you can't prove a negative, so there's no work to do. You can't prove that there isn't an elephant inside the trunk of my car. You sure? How about now? Maybe he was just hiding before. Check again. Did I mention that my personal heartfelt definition of the word "elephant" includes mystery, order, goodness, love and a spare tire?

So, anyone with a love for truth outside of herself has to start with no belief in God and then look for evidence of God. She needs to search for some objective evidence of a supernatural power. All the people I write e-mails to often are still stuck at this searching stage. The atheism part is easy.

But, this "This I Believe" thing seems to demand something more personal, some leap of faith that helps one see life's big picture, some rules to live by. So, I'm saying, "This I believe: I believe there is no God."
Having taken that step, it informs every moment of my life. I'm not greedy. I have love, blue skies, rainbows and Hallmark cards, and that has to be enough. It has to be enough, but it's everything in the world and everything in the world is plenty for me. It seems just rude to beg the invisible for more. Just the love of my family that raised me and the family I'm raising now is enough that I don't need heaven. I won the huge genetic lottery and I get joy every day.

Believing there's no God means I can't really be forgiven except by kindness and faulty memories. That's good; it makes me want to be more thoughtful. I have to try to treat people right the first time around.

Believing there's no God stops me from being solipsistic. I can read ideas from all different people from all different cultures. Without God, we can agree on reality, and I can keep learning where I'm wrong. We can all keep adjusting, so we can really communicate. I don't travel in circles where people say, "I have faith, I believe this in my heart and nothing you can say or do can shake my faith." That's just a long-winded religious way to say, "shut up," or another two words that the FCC likes less. But all obscenity is less insulting than, "How I was brought up and my imaginary friend means more to me than anything you can ever say or do." So, believing there is no God lets me be proven wrong and that's always fun. It means I'm learning something.

Believing there is no God means the suffering I've seen in my family, and indeed all the suffering in the world, isn't caused by an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent force that isn't bothered to help or is just testing us, but rather something we all may be able to help others with in the future. No God means the possibility of less suffering in the future.

Believing there is no God gives me more room for belief in family, people, love, truth, beauty, sex, Jell-O and all the other things I can prove and that make this life the best life I will ever have.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5015557
 
hmmmm, sounds like the same arguement some have used throughout history, The arguemnt of intolerence. We would be better off without religeon so lets get rid of all those that are religious and don't agree with.

**sarcasm**



ohh, and science is a religeon to and one of the most intolerent. We all know so called intellectuals are the most venemous when people disagree with them.

Strawman. It's "let's stop treating religious assertions, groundless, harmful, and antithetical to reason, as exempt from the same evidence-based inquiry that every other idea is subject to."
 
Just natural and normal and consistent, as that comes easily once you have a coherant integrated BASE called Jesus.....

I guess here he is free-basing some kind of powdered jesus (odd name for cocaine, but then it is DJ). Sure hope what happened to Pryor doesn't happen to DJ while he's on a toot (old school term)!:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :D :rolleyes:
 
I guess here he is free-basing some kind of powdered jesus (odd name for cocaine, but then it is DJ). Sure hope what happened to Pryor doesn't happen to DJ while he's on a toot (old school term)!:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :D :rolleyes:

[singing]
Powdered Jesus!
Powdered Jesus!
Chopped into fine lines upon my mirr'r
Keeps me higher than cocaine, oh!
Hope he wasn't cut with Dran-o
Powdered Jesus eases all my fears

Powdered Jesus!
Powdered Jesus!
Riding up a straw into my nose
Every law of his, I've kept 'em
Though he deviates my septum
When he fills me with that Holy Ghost
[/singing]
 

Back
Top Bottom