Webpage "Patriots Question 9/11" Addressed

[Slayhamlet]

Joerg Schneider

Okay, thank you. Do you realize that neither your post nor the post that you quoted (by TAM) said anything about Jörg Schneider? Am I missing something here or did you just forget to mention his name?

Edit: I see TAM's original post did contain a quote mentioning Jörg Schneider, but it didn't copy into your quote of TAM's post. Quotes within quotes are dropped by the vBulletin program, apparently.

 

[boloboffin]

What do Bachmann and Schneider think about WTC 1 and 2? Their comments are specific to 7.

How are they "familiar with the design"? Did they examine the complete blueprints? Are they only looking at the information from the FEMA report or did they have the benefit of the NIST Interim Report as well? Or were they only informed of some basic features of the design? What exactly did they know about the design of 7 World Trade?

How much did they know about the fires? Some conspiracy theorists think that only 2 or 3 small fires were in the building. Is that all Bachmann and Schneider think were there? Have they seen things like the Spak video? Have they included the NIST Interim Report's summation of the many fires throughout the building into their analysis?

Was Daniele Ganser the sole source of any information about 7 that they received? If so, what exactly did he give them? Are there any recordings of his interviews with them?

I ask these question because DC implies that he or she has had direct access to the professors.

 

[DC]

What do Bachmann and Schneider think about WTC 1 and 2? Their comments are specific only to 7.

Schneider does not think WTC1 and 2 was brought down by a CD.

but Bachman has Interesting views on that, email him and ask him

 

[boloboffin]

Schneider does not think WTC1 and 2 was brought down by a CD.

but Bachman has Interesting views on that, email him and ask him

I edited my post to include some more questions which you didn't get a chance to see before you replied, just for the record.

So Schneider is ignored by the Truth Movement in exactly the way that Jowenko is ignored. Is that why Schneider isn't mentioned at all in the AE911Truth Powerpoint, I wonder? Because that would be two people who they would have to pretend hasn't spoken on 1 and 2? Hmmm.

My German is limited to two years of high school and one of college over 20 years ago. If Professor Bachmann can handle a conversation in English (and he most likely can, I've no doubt), I'd be happy to talk with him. If you think sending his email by private message would be accepted by him, I'd be happy to receive it.

 

[T.A.M.]

I asked them if theyr comments was printed correctly in the Newspaper, they confirmed, they also knew about the design and the fires etc. they are both very highly respected Structural Engineers. Both have writen several books.

and about Daniele Ganser. He is a man. Daniele is the Italian way of spelling Daniel. He was a professor here at the University of Basel, now he is working in Zürich afaik, still gives some lessons in Basel. He has written several good books about secret armys and other conspiracys , also did alot work in exposing a swiss conspiracy where alot privat details about swiss ppl was illegaly stored. He is a joung but very respected professor.

BTW: they are translated pretty correct, are you also so sceptical about translations in arabic/english translations of videos and such?

Thanks for the info. Although there is an obvious bias to the thread, the point of it is to provided clarification.

On a side note, do these structural engineers plan on producing any papers with their proposed cause of collapse of WTC7?

TAM

 

[DC]

i cannot speak in their name. so if you have questions, do direct them to Schneider and Bachman.
setup a mail in english and i will translate it to German if you want. then you can send it.

 

[boloboffin]

i cannot speak in their name. so if you have questions, do direct them to Schneider and Bachman.
setup a mail in english and i will translate it to German if you want. then you can send it.

If I send you a message for them, and then you translate it, send it to them, receive it back, translate it, and send it back to me, you ARE speaking in their name. AND mine.

Thank you, but no. I am quite happy to conduct my own conversation with them, however I have to do it. If you cannot provide an email address for them, I understand.

 

[DC]

then YOU can send it is writen in my post. i thaught in english that means, that YOU send it, and also receive it. maybe im misstaken......

 

[DC]

i have the adressed at home, i can provide them to you if you want. but you can find it with 2 min of googl research