• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

We Now Know When Jesus Returns

Status
Not open for further replies.
It doesn't make sense to write a biography of someone and not mention his death if he already died.

Have you actually knowingly read fiction lately? Have you read the texts for other religions, for that matter? Your reasoning here does not constitute proof, by any means. At best, it could be considered weak evidence, by way of assumption. It *suggests* that things *might* have occurred that way, but no more than that. It doesn't even remotely remove all other explanations from the figurative table.
 
I don't have to do better than that. Burden is on you. I see no problem with the Scriptures.

Really? None at all? How hard do you look, after one quick glance I see that Matthew says that two Marys first saw Jesus resurrected, Mark and John say that it was Mary Magdalene alone, and Luke says it was Cleopas and another who saw the resurrected Jesus first.
 
Have you actually knowingly read fiction lately? Have you read the texts for other religions, for that matter? Your reasoning here does not constitute proof, by any means. At best, it could be considered weak evidence, by way of assumption. It *suggests* that things *might* have occurred that way, but no more than that. It doesn't even remotely remove all other explanations from the figurative table.
Other religions can't prove their claims. Whereas in Christianity the proof is the testimony of the dsiciples seeing Jesus alive from the dead in various group settings. No naturalistic explanation can account for this.
 
Really? None at all? How hard do you look, after one quick glance I see that Matthew says that two Marys first saw Jesus resurrected, Mark and John say that it was Mary Magdalene alone, and Luke says it was Cleopas and another who saw the resurrected Jesus first.
Different perspectives. Not a problem. When you go to the movies and you say Jane really enjoyed it, it doesn't mean Paul did not go along with you also, you just didn't mention him in the passage.
 
Different perspectives. Not a problem. When you go to the movies and you say Jane really enjoyed it, it doesn't mean Paul did not go along with you also, you just didn't mention him in the passage.

This seems like an important event, I can't imagine anybody not being mentioned as being privy to the resurrection of their savior if they were actually there/
 
Your die throwing is not related to Scripture and Aug. 7, 2022 is not a prediction of the end of the world but when Jesus steps down on the mount of olives.
I'm not talking about the end of the world, but instead your method of determining probabilities and calling miraculous is no different from my die throwing example.

To put it another way, try to imagine the odds of your existence, the odds that you were born with your particular gender, genetic code, in the city where you were born, born to parents with a particular genetic recipe, born with a particular blood type, etc. Its actually kinda fun to put all those probabilities down on paper, you might find that odds of you being you are infinitesimally small, and if they're so unlikely, then how could you possibly exist without a miracle?

The trick is understanding that all other probabilities were equally likely, there's no good reason to presume an paranormal force is selecting some outcomes over others.

We all just happen to be fortunate to live in the day and age to confirm the Rev. 6.12 earthquake 2010-11.
Take a moment to actually read about earthquakes. The earthquake in Haiti was magnitude 7 and killed 50-85K people, its nowhere near the strongest or even the deadliest in history. There are about over a million earthquakes per year, about 20 or so which are strong or stronger than the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. In other words, earthquakes of this type happen back to back, almost every year for the whole history of planet.

Please also read about confirmation bias. To put it bluntly, people have a tendency to focus on evidence which supports their belief, ignore evidence that negates. In your particular case, you have a view that Rapture is going to occur, and you're trying to look for evidence to support the belief no matter how specious, you will discount evidence to the contrary (e.g. the 100% failure rate of 10s of 1000s of predictions for centuries, the billions of irrelevant earthquakes in history that are no more remarkable from the 2010 quake).

You are in no better position than anyone else in history who has made the exact same predictions you have, you're not the only person who has ever lived to be absolutely convinced that your date is correct and all the others are wrong, you're not the first person in history to state categorically with 100% sincerity that your prediction will happen. And you won't be the first person in history whose prediction fails, or the first person backtracks and claims an error in your calculation, or the first person who "recalculates" a later date, or the first person whose recalculated date fails.

And have it up on the NASA website the Nov. 3 long H3 solar eclipse - 4th since Christ.
There are many really interesting astrological phenomenon which happen once in a few hundred or thousand years. What makes those eclipses special, besides their rarity of course?

When the Dome of the Rock is torn down around 2014 and a couple million people vanish Sept. 14, 2015 perhaps you will reconsider and give your life to Christ.
You are aware that there have been 10s of 1000s of people for centuries with just as much faith in their own predictions as you are in yours, and every one of those people thinks they are right and you are wrong, and every one of those people is in fact wrong.

And you want me to believe that you, who have nothing more or less profound than anything ever said before, have access to knowledge that no other person in history ever though of? That you are the first person to attach paranormal meaning to natural disasters and, unlike a million others before, actually get it right? Really? Really?

Please, can you at least do this for me: live out your life as if the Rapture wouldn't happen. I've seen it myself where people are "Rapture Ready", they believe its going to happen so soon that they have no interest in going to school, saving up money to put their kids through college, they lose contact with their friends and family, they sell their house, their car, everything they own, they become absolutely obsessed -- and then they're **********. Not only did they throw away their entire standard of living, but all that time waiting for nothing, when they could have developed hobbies in writing, or spent time with friends, earned a degree in college, actually lived a life rather than sitting through it. People seriously throw away decades of potentially productive life waiting for the Rapture to occur.

Please, at least concede that there is a tiny, maybe 0.00001%, that you've made an error, so in the totally-unlikely-not-gonna-happen-could-never-think-it-definitely-not-in-bajillion-years chance that your wrong, you don't totally **** up your life when your date comes and goes without incident.
 
Last edited:
This seems like an important event, I can't imagine anybody not being mentioned as being privy to the resurrection of their savior if they were actually there/
They were mentioned in different settings - 12 in all given in the Scriptures.
 
I'm also late to this thread so let me go back to this post.

I didn't. At first for a year I heard it and didn't give it much consideration. Then the Holy Spirit drew me into to examine it further, but of course I rejected Mark Biltz's view of 2008 to 2015 since I knew Rev. 6.12 occurs before the Tribulation. The Holy Spirit told me the Tetrads 1949/50 and 1967/68 were signifcant and to start from there with understanding.

I was told to examine those earthquakes for their rareness, and I was told to find on the NASA website if there was a unique solar eclipse between the earthquakes and the 2014/15 Tetrad.

Once that was realized, God told me to count down 2,520 days from Feast of Trumpets to find the exact 7 year period.
When god tells you things, how does that happen? Is it an audible voice? If I was in the room with you, would I also hear god? Please describe the experience in detail.

Does he ever write things down or does he only communicate by voice? How about email? Do you ever get get an email with information from god?
 
I'm not talking about the end of the world, but instead your method of determining probabilities and calling miraculous is no different from my die throwing example.
It's not the case at all since there is no religio-historical context to your dice throwing. It has no application.
 
They were mentioned in different settings - 12 in all given in the Scriptures.

So because they were mentioned in different settings, different people were there? There is only one first witness to a resurrection, which account is correct?
 
So because they were mentioned in different settings, different people were there? There is only one first witness to a resurrection, which account is correct?
Nobody witnessed a resurrection but they saw Jesus resurrected.
 
The you that you are now would have happened already so infinite regress is impossible. And something can't come from nothing, so nature needs a cause outside of itself, outside of time and space, being uncreated. This is whom we call God.
If something can't come from nothing, and God is something, then ... But I needn't finish that question. Intelligent 5 year olds ask it, but nobody has ever answered it except by hand waving and word games. And if God has always been there because something must always have been there, why can that thing not be matter / energy its simplest form? If something has to be posited as primordial, let it be the simplest thing possible, not the most complex, which God must be.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom