What could be more boring than living in a universe where everything goes entirely your way, all the time, forever? Every time you hit the ball, it's a home run; every woman you meet wants to have sex with you; every shot is a basket. Forever.
I'm a believer. It feels good to believe the universe is infinite. That there is a God who cares. That this isn't the only life you get. I mean, how awesome is it to live in a infinite universe. It feels awesome just knowing you live in a infinite universe. It means I can be born as something other than male or female. There are actually an infinite number of genders you can be born as. Like it would be cool to be born on a planet where it requires 3 people to make a baby. The possibilities are endless.
Then if you are an atheist you just believe you have this one life. That's boring.
Post moved to this thread: You already have a thread (this one) discussing this please do not open new threads to discuss topic you are already actively discussing in other threads.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic Posted By: Darat
OTOH, it can be very troubling. If things are so much better when you're dead, why bother with life? If you get to choose the heaven you like best, why hang around in this life? Why not hurry up and just plain go to heaven? It seems logical.
I did answer. I said, "I very much doubt there can be a description other than a mathematical one, and I'm not a quantum mathematician. That's why I rely on the likes of Hawking and Krauss to summarise these things."
Yeah but that's an answer that tells me you won't answer. Why do you expect me to answer all your questions if you answer none of mine? You say you rely on physicists to do the summaries; so provide one of their summaries, then.
I can't see how something could be said to exist outside space and time. What would it exist in?
Without space and time it would have no dimension. It wouldn't be "in" anything. From your comment above it seems like an argument from incredulity, but as you know, QM isn't exactly intuitive.
Yeah but that's an answer that tells me you won't answer. Why do you expect me to answer all your questions if you answer none of mine? You say you rely on physicists to do the summaries; so provide one of their summaries, then.
I just did. Twice, in fact, because as well as Hawking's quote on de Sitter universes appearing from 'literally nothing', I said, "Krauss talks of there being a net balance of negative and positive energy in the universe, or more precisely of the universe, which would suggest there are no physical laws being broken in the creation of everything from nothing, or its eventual return."
So I'll try again one last time: Do you or do you not have any cosmologist or physicist who states that something cannot come from nothing, or indeed any evidence whatsoever that something cannot come from nothing.
Without space and time it would have no dimension. It wouldn't be "in" anything. From your comment above it seems like an argument from incredulity, but as you know, QM isn't exactly intuitive.
Oh, look what I found in perusing this poster's previous missives:
You're an atheist who believes in god. Righto, chap. Let me see if I can help you:
-the indefinite article preceding a vowel is "an", not "a".
Lot's of really clever people have come here over the years thinking they can take the piss out of us. They were wrong. If they couldn't succeed, you may want to have a closer look at your chances.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.