Speaking of rational discussion from the OWS side:
![]()
As I watched that video, I kept hoping the police would use their shields to check one of those guys in the face. Alas, the police were more professional than I would have been in their shoes.
Speaking of rational discussion from the OWS side:
![]()
I see the 'Occupy Wall Street Better Defend it's Identity' thread is still going and I think maybe it's best to put this issue to rest by saying we're going to disagree with the purpose, efforts, and demeanor of the Occupy movement. I know that I kicked and screamed, and huffed and puffed at a few of you and it's obvious a good number of you are set with your opinions. No amount of kicking, screaming, huffing, or puffing is going to change your minds. I say we bury the hatchet and agree to disagree. There is no rational debate that is going to come out of this, especially from those who disagree with the movement, so I'm willing to say "who cares?" and move on!
I've got no problem with voicing disagreements.
And I am absolutely repulsed by some of the utter weirdos that they seem to attract.
As I watched that video, I kept hoping the police would use their shields to check one of those guys in the face. Alas, the police were more professional than I would have been in their shoes.
Speaking of rational discussion from the OWS side:
![]()
Such as?
SO? They're standing up against the police! This is something that needs to happen every so often!
Critical thinking is what I excel at. These Occutards do not rise to the level of, and should not be dubbed, as "Filthy hippies".....To sit here and come up with words like "Occutards" and "Filthy hippies" and the sort is really no solution for anything nor does it have anything to do with what this forum is about, which is CRITICAL THINKING! ....
Well, those guys certainly do look like weirdos and quite obviously are not your run of the mill social democrats but rather posturing Che Guevara wannabes.
Nevertheless, we don't know exactly what happened before that. The guy is claiming to have been whacked with the cop's baton and if that is the case then a bit of fruity language in exchange doesn't seem so bad. I certainly wouldn't be in favour of "looking-the-other-way" while state troopers are allowed to beat him.
mmm mmm mmm...Let's not agree to disagree. Let's go nya, nya OWS's critics we were right, you were wrong.
Let's not agree to disagree. Let's go nya, nya OWS's critics we were right, you were wrong.
Such as?
You are aware that moveon.org is at a different URL, right?I see the 'Occupy Wall Street Better Defend it's Identity' thread is still going and I think maybe it's best to put this issue to rest by saying we're going to disagree with the purpose, efforts, and demeanor of the Occupy movement. I know that I kicked and screamed, and huffed and puffed at a few of you and it's obvious a good number of you are set with your opinions. No amount of kicking, screaming, huffing, or puffing is going to change your minds. I say we bury the hatchet and agree to disagree. There is no rational debate that is going to come out of this, especially from those who disagree with the movement, so I'm willing to say "who cares?" and move on!
~~~~I'm willing to say "who cares?"~~~~