• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Waterboy Replies to Ryan Mackey

Hey, you could have just typed: I'm going to dodge this response by Mr. Ryan at this time because he just made me look foolish on just a couple of points in my paper.

Except that this never happened - Kevin Ryan's 10-page "response" is little more than a whimper that does nothing to refute Mackey's work.
 
Wow, Ryan I'm surprised you would offer this error as an early rebuttal.
Now did you or didn't you work on JSF which is what the DOD describes as a strike aircraft weapon systems?

What part of "not on the weapons systems" did you not understand? There is more to the JSF then weapons systems.
 
Well we have all seen many of these warnings before...so

JREF just proved this correct...
Too bad no a single person can support Kevin's work with facts or evidence. Not you, not anyone. Why? Why is all of 9/11 truth fact less? Swing, you can not answer anything 9/11 and back it with facts. Why? Now Kevin publishes a simple letter attacking the person, no facts to attack the paper. Why? You can not answer these questions due to the fact you and 9/11 truth have none.

When you add up all the efforts of 9/11 truth and those like you who support the crazy ideas of 9/11 truth, you come up with bunch of zeros. Failure is 9/11 truth.

Why do people fall for the fraud of 9/11 truth?
 
What part of "not on the weapons systems" did you not understand? There is more to the JSF then weapons systems.
Do you have reading comprehension problems? Do you understand that R Mackey stated Kevin Ryan was wrong when in fact he was right?
Go back and read Mackey's original comment and then feel free to not respond to this comment
The JSF is a weapons systems as described by the U.S. Department of Defense. Ryan Mackey did work on a strike fighter weapon system, ie. the JSF.
 
Do you have reading comprehension problems? Do you understand that R Mackey stated Kevin Ryan was wrong when in fact he was right?
Go back and read Mackey's original comment and then feel free to not respond to this comment
The JSF is a weapons systems as described by the U.S. Department of Defense. Ryan Mackey did work on a strike fighter weapon system, ie. the JSF.

And there, ladies and gentlemen, is a prime example of why there is little to be gained by treating the arguments put forth by 'truthers' with the respect they so desperately crave. There is no nuance in woowooland, there is no context, and there is no vernacular. It's all plain, black and white.

And, of course, it's much better (and safer) for the 'truthers' to argue on one minute interpretation of an insignificant passage of text, than to face up to the consequences of their beliefs and actually venture into the the real world and do something real about it.

We see it with Malmoesoldier, swingdangler et al and quite frankly, the next time someone bitches that we don't treat them respectfully enough, I may just type 'bollocks!' and be damned.
 
Last edited:
Do you have reading comprehension problems? Do you understand that R Mackey stated Kevin Ryan was wrong when in fact he was right?
Go back and read Mackey's original comment and then feel free to not respond to this comment
The JSF is a weapons systems as described by the U.S. Department of Defense. Ryan Mackey did work on a strike fighter weapon system, ie. the JSF.

And people are poop producers if you want to look at it that way.
 
Yes. Color me unimpressed.

This quote in particular jumped out at me, because it suggests that Ryan gave up trying to refutes Mackey's work and went for the route of whining instead.

But for reasons that may shortly
become obvious to the reader, a point-by-point rebuttal of Mackey’s lengthy
paper is not necessary.
REALLY. Then why write anything? You've got nothing to say.

K. Ryan has about 10 footnotes, among which are either the Urinal of 9-11 Truth, AmericanBuddhist.com, 9-11Truth.org., etc. Bulletproof.

Did you read Mackey's thorough 200 page rebuttal and refutation of DRG's nonsense?

Kevin Ryan's letter does NOTHING to refute anything Mackey wrote. It does EVERYTHING to suggest that Kevin Ryan is a bitter fraud.
 
Last edited:
Do you have reading comprehension problems? Do you understand that R Mackey stated Kevin Ryan was wrong when in fact he was right?
Go back and read Mackey's original comment and then feel free to not respond to this comment
The JSF is a weapons systems as described by the U.S. Department of Defense. Ryan Mackey did work on a strike fighter weapon system, ie. the JSF.

So Swingy, if I install a car stereo in an automobile does that qualify me to work on the engine as well? There are many different complex systems in the JSF, and the weapons system is one of them, which Mackey said he did not work on. Why is this hard for you to understand?
 
Last edited:
Do you have reading comprehension problems? Do you understand that R Mackey stated Kevin Ryan was wrong when in fact he was right?
Go back and read Mackey's original comment and then feel free to not respond to this comment
The JSF is a weapons systems as described by the U.S. Department of Defense. Ryan Mackey did work on a strike fighter weapon system, ie. the JSF.
And if you dig into the literature, you'll find that the F-35 Lightning II is a
Weapons DELIVERY System. It is not a weapons systems itself.

Take it from one who knows.
IPT Wing
Subsystems Tech. Lead.
Me.
 
Last edited:
You realize you are wrong and Kevin is right when describing the project you actually worked on! :newlol

The F-35 is the next generation strike fighter bringing cutting-edge technologies to the battlespace of the future. The JSFs advanced airframe, autonomic logistics, avionics, propulsion systems, stealth, and firepower will ensure that the F-35 is the most affordable, lethal, supportable and survivable aircraft

The JSF is a fighter. Just because it includes weapons systems doesn't mean that that is all it is.
 
Last edited:
Wow, waterboy is walking a fine line at THE Journal of 911 Something or other, by calling out all the anonymous posters at JREF! You see at THE Journal, they strongly discourage anonymous letters. Oh hells yes they publish them, of course, all the time. But they are discouraged you see.
 

Back
Top Bottom