Watch trailer: 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

[Marokkaan]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIOC1J44RYw&feature=channel_video_title

The film features cutting-edge 9/11 evidence from more than 50 experts in their fields – high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemical engineers, firefighters, metallurgists, explosives experts, controlled demolition technicians, and more. They are each highly qualified. Several have Ph.D’s, including renowned scientist, Lynn Margulis who was awarded the National Medal of Science, and who exposes in this film the fraud of NIST and discusses how the scientific method should have been applied to the destruction of evidence and to the high temperature incendiaries in the WTC dust samples. The documentary is filled with wisdom from experts such as Les Young, one of several high-rise architects interviewed in the film, who remarks,

“I would not have expected the whole building to just give in at once. And I thought it rather odd that they fell almost perfectly – in very similar ways. It seemed odd that lightning would strike twice.”

Chemical Engineer Mark Basile. The first scientist who ignited a red/gray chip from the World Trade Center dust and found iron-rich microspheres in the residue discusses his process of discovery using the scientific method

In the full-length documentary we also interviewed almost a dozen psychologists who will help us to explain why 9/11 Truth is so difficult for the public to even face, much less accept – and what we can do better to reach them. We will also hear from several 9/11 victim family members who support AE911Truth in our call for a new investigation.

Psychologist William Woodward, Ph.D, one of eight mental health professionals who are also AE911Truth petition signers, provides a profound insight in that section of the film:

"Reconciliation through the truth is a deep path to psychological recovery from the myths and lies around which this historic event has been cloaked in the official view
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/544-eso-trailer.html

 

[Brainster]

Lynn Margulis gets about the most face time in the trailer of anyone. Quick question: Which of the following is she?

1. high-rise architect
2. structural engineer
3. physicist
4. chemical engineer
5. firefighter
6. metallurgist
7. explosives expert
8. controlled demolition technician
9. microbiologist specializing in multiple prokaryotic organisms

 

[Marokkaan]

Lynn Margulis gets about the most face time in the trailer of anyone. Quick question: Which of the following is she?

1. high-rise architect
2. structural engineer
3. physicist
4. chemical engineer
5. firefighter
6. metallurgist
7. explosives expert
8. controlled demolition technician
9. microbiologist specializing in multiple prokaryotic organisms

Lynn Margulis (born March 5, 1938) is an American biologist and University Professor in the Department of Geosciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.[1] She is best known for her theory on the origin of eukaryotic organelles, and her contributions to the endosymbiotic theory, which is now generally accepted for how certain organelles were formed.

She has only one goal and that is:

discusses how the scientific method should have been applied to the destruction of evidence and to the high temperature incendiaries in the WTC dust samples

 

[DC]

Lynn Margulis (born March 5, 1938) is an American biologist and University Professor in the Department of Geosciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.[1] She is best known for her theory on the origin of eukaryotic organelles, and her contributions to the endosymbiotic theory, which is now generally accepted for how certain organelles were formed.

She has only one goal and that is:

discusses how the scientific method should have been applied to the destruction of evidence and to the high temperature incendiaries in the WTC dust samples

so it was a biological atack? with eukaryotic organelles?

 

[Marokkaan]

so it was a biological atack? with eukaryotic organelles?

Are u an illiterate?

 

[DC]

Are u an illiterate?

your title claims Expert speaks out. so when her expertise is microbiology, it only follows that the atacks have something to do with microbiology.
if not, her expertise is of no use.

 

[Sceptic-PK]

Any theologians involved?

 

[uke2se]

Heh, it's just the same old PRATTs spoken by people with letters after their names. Well, there's a lot more people with letters after their names that would call these people idiots.

 

[Marokkaan]

your title claims Expert speaks out. so when her expertise is microbiology, it only follows that the atacks have something to do with microbiology.
if not, her expertise is of no use.

Does it says expert on Nano thermite or expert on wtc????

Read again my post. What her goal is, its not about NIST not about nano thermite.

But its about the laws of science research.

 

[uke2se]

Does it says expert on Nano thermite or expert on wtc????

Read again my post. What her goal is, its not about NIST not about nano thermite.

But its about the laws of science research.

But if she's not an expert in the field she is speaking about in the video, it is dishonest to label her an expert. This kind of dishonesty is nothing new to twoofers, of course, but it warrants being pointed out nonetheless.

 

[Marokkaan]

But if she's not an expert in the field she is speaking about in the video, it is dishonest to label her an expert. This kind of dishonesty is nothing new to twoofers, of course, but it warrants being pointed out nonetheless.

LOL, oh so you say, she is not an expert? And what kind of field she need to be an expert, where she is talking about?

 

[Sceptic-PK]

LOL, oh so you say, she is not an expert? And what kind of field she need to be an expert, where she is talking about?

Experts publish papers, not talk bollocks in Youtube videos.

 

[fitzgibbon]

LOL, oh so you say, she is not an expert? And what kind of field she need to be an expert, where she is talking about?

One that's actually relevant to 9/11. You know...like physics...architecture...that kind of thing.

Unless microbes were responsible for the collapse of any or all of the WTC.

 

[leftysergeant]

LOL, oh so you say, she is not an expert? And what kind of field she need to be an expert, where she is talking about?

I'm still more qualified to address any of the evidence related to the collapse than that self-important twit.

I know fire science.

I know a bit of military science.

I know terrorist tactics.

And I know BS when I smell it.

Somebody open a window and turn on the ventillating fan.

 

[DC]

Does it says expert on Nano thermite or expert on wtc????

Read again my post. What her goal is, its not about NIST not about nano thermite.

But its about the laws of science research.

So her field of expertise has nothing to do with it. why then is she called an expert?
when she works outside of her field, that is fine, when she is publishing her scientific work, i am sure it will be considered when it meets the standards of the field she wants to publish in.
but a youtube video is not the way to go, and as a scientist she should know that.

so it is uterly misleading and totaly dishonest to count her as an expert.
She is not an expert in the fields involved.

but that is to be expected from the Church of trutherism.

 

[Marokkaan]

I'm still more qualified to address any of the evidence related to the collapse than that self-important twit.

I know fire science.

I know a bit of military science.

I know terrorist tactics.

And I know BS when I smell it.

Somebody open a window and turn on the ventillating fan.

What a lot of emotions lol

So her field of expertise has nothing to do with it. why then is she called an expert?
when she works outside of her field, that is fine, when she is publishing her scientific work, i am sure it will be considered when it meets the standards of the field she wants to publish in.
but a youtube video is not the way to go, and as a scientist she should know that.

so it is uterly misleading and totaly dishonest to count her as an expert.
She is not an expert in the fields involved.

but that is to be expected from the Church of trutherism.

You dont know the meaning of expert?

Lets take the dictionary

ex·pert (kspûrt)
n.
1. A person with a high degree of skill in or knowledge of a certain subject.
2.
a. The highest grade that can be achieved in marksmanship.
b. A person who has achieved this grade.
adj. (kspûrt, k-spûrt)
Having, involving, or demonstrating great skill, dexterity, or knowledge as the result of experience or training. See Synonyms at proficient.

So now you finally know what an expert is.

Now you have to understand, that the experts use there knowledge for the 911truth organisation.

The one about the structure of a building, the other abouth the laws of physischs.

And another about the scientific methods for research like her.

 

[DC]

What a lot of emotions lol




You dont know the meaning of expert?

Lets take the dictionary

ex·pert (kspûrt)
n.
1. A person with a high degree of skill in or knowledge of a certain subject.2.
a. The highest grade that can be achieved in marksmanship.b. A person who has achieved this grade.
adj. (kspûrt, k-spûrt)
Having, involving, or demonstrating great skill, dexterity, or knowledge as the result of experience or training. See Synonyms at proficient.

So now you finally know what an expert is.

Now you have to understand, that the experts use there knowledge for the 911truth organisation.

The one about the structure of a building, the other abouth the laws of physischs.

And another about the scientific methods for research like her.

her field of expertiese is usefull for 9/11 in what way?

you seem not to know what an expert is, even after you have trown around the definition. and you ask me if i am illiterate?

 

[fitzgibbon]

You dont know the meaning of expert?

It seems everyone BUT you seems to realise that her area of expertise is irrelevant to discussing the minutiae of 9/11. She's talking out of her area of expertise; are you going to herald the same consideration to an "expert" on the films of Orson Welles? They're areas of expertise would be as relevant.

I'm sniffing an odour of riverside bridge-dweller. Anyone gotta goat?

 

[Marokkaan]

her field of expertiese is usefull for 9/11 in what way?

you seem not to know what an expert is, even after you have trown around the definition. and you ask me if i am illiterate?

Damn, i think you are illiterate, because you are constantly ignoring what i wrote about the goal of her.

For the last time. She is an expert. You cant deny. Her role as an expert, is to tell about her knowledge about the scientific methods of a research.

Famed scientist, Lynn Margulis, provides crucial rules and elements within an investigative scientific analysis to procure an accepted hypotheses vs. what's depicted in the NIST report

You can see here the interview with here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0fkDmi78Og

 

[Sceptic-PK]

Damn, i think you are illeterate

Lulz.