radical_logic
Muse
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2008
- Messages
- 505
What, for the 10th time now? It's YOUR ARTICLE
DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ARTICLE YOU ARE USING AS A SOURCE DESPITE ME CONSTANTLY YELLING YOU THIS? DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ARTICLE YOU ARE USING AS A SOURCE DESPITE ME CONSTANTLY YELLING YOU THIS? DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ARTICLE YOU ARE USING AS A SOURCE DESPITE ME CONSTANTLY YELLING YOU THIS? DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ARTICLE YOU ARE USING AS A SOURCE DESPITE ME CONSTANTLY YELLING YOU THIS? DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ARTICLE YOU ARE USING AS A SOURCE DESPITE ME CONSTANTLY YELLING YOU THIS? DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ARTICLE YOU ARE USING AS A SOURCE DESPITE ME CONSTANTLY YELLING YOU THIS? DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ARTICLE YOU ARE USING AS A SOURCE DESPITE ME CONSTANTLY YELLING YOU THIS? DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SAME ARTICLE YOU ARE USING AS A SOURCE DESPITE ME CONSTANTLY YELLING YOU THIS?
I am not sure how many times I have to keep repeating that, so just to be clear here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/10/attack/main508656.shtml
Again, quote the part of the article that supports this claim of yours: "you left out the most important parts of the quotes whcih explained as to WHY they felt the way they did and how it was more so about his language skills and othere non-flying related things."
But this is incorrect, as the article shows.
"They reported him not because they feared he was a terrorist, but because his English and flying skills were so bad, they told the Associated Press, they didn't think he should keep his pilot's license."
Therefore, they reported him mainly because his flying skills were "so bad."
