Was Bush wired for the debate?

gnome said:
The way I envisioned this scenario, Bush was unconsciously talking to the feeder, feeling interrupted by new cues before he was finished speaking the last thought.

I bet it's hard, if someone's talking in your ear, and able to respond to things that you say, to keep from saying something back to them at times.


I hope you realize that this feeder would need to be at a location intimate to the event as it is transpiring in real time since all broadcasts, even so called live, have a time delay...which means that a remote location with a live broadcast feed is out of the question.

So where do you think this feeder was. In the audience, back stage.

Where?
 
csense said:
I hope you realize that this feeder would need to be at a location intimate to the event as it is transpiring in real time since all broadcasts, even so called live, have a time delay...which means that a remote location with a live broadcast feed is out of the question.

So where do you think this feeder was. In the audience, back stage.

Where?

Hey, take it easy. I'm not convinced there was a feeder. I'm just exploring the possibilities. You raise a very good question here.

Where do the candidate's assistants and such stay during the debate? In the audience, backstage, or elsewhere...? I can't really speculate without knowing how that part of it is organized.

In addition, would it be as easy to wire a microphone to him as a receiver?
 
gnome said:
The way I envisioned this scenario, Bush was unconsciously talking to the feeder, feeling interrupted by new cues before he was finished speaking the last thought.

I bet it's hard, if someone's talking in your ear, and able to respond to things that you say, to keep from saying something back to them at times.

Ah, ok. That makes sense now.

Uttering things aloud without realizing it something I do a lot when I'm trying to work a non-math problem through.
 
I don't think at all that it would be impossible to wire Bush in such a way that it was virtually impossible (save for a full body search, and I don't expect anyone to be that perverse...) to detect it.

That's why I find the placement of a possible transmitter so ridiculous. Just put it in his belt, on his back!

I'm not buying this at all.
 
CFLarsen said:
I don't think at all that it would be impossible to wire Bush in such a way that it was virtually impossible (save for a full body search, and I don't expect anyone to be that perverse...) to detect it.

That's why I find the placement of a possible transmitter so ridiculous. Just put it in his belt, on his back!

I'm not buying this at all.

That's close to where I'm at... at this point his behavior is more convincing than that suspicious lump. But it's not proof.
 
gnome said:
...that suspicious lump. .

Here's the picture with the so called lump:


story.jpg




The anomaly has two distinct properties. A short horizontal line from one shoulder to the next. And and a long slender line from the same point at about the top middle of his back, all the way down to the tail of the suit. These two lines are perpendicular to each, or rather at right angles to each other.

If you look at the vertical line as compared to his shoulders, you can clearly make the judgement that it is approximately center with his back, along the same axis as the backbone, or vertebrae.

These lines form a "T" shape rather than a square that some people are inferring.

The small horizonatal wrinkle corresponds from point to point with the bottom part of the shoulder blades where there is somewhat of a blunt rounded point on the bone itself. Reach around your back to your own shoulder blade and you can feel it.

Now look at the posture of the President and you can clearly see that his shoulders are exerting force outwards, pulling on the fabric of the suit and in effect pulling it tight and smooth directly above that point and forming the outline of the bone of the shoulder blade.


Below all this, there is nothing exerting equal lateral force like there is above, so it won't have the same tension here and thus the fabric in this area won't be smooth. Now if we look at the President's posture again we clearly see that he is somewhat hunched forward and his head is not in line with his vertebrae, and this force that is pushing forward and perpendicular to the lateral force of the shoulder blades, has the effect of pulling up on the suit, causing the fabric in the area below the shoulder blades that is free of lateral tension to form the wrinkle that you are seeing.

The vectors of the wrinkles correspond to the tensional forces that are being applied ...it is that simple.

A well tailored suit, probably enhances the effect since there is less material to absorb the tensional forces generated by someone who is very animated like the President...and especially with his physique of large shoulders.
 
Here's another controversial picture:


capt.pd13510090242.debate_pd135.jpg




If you look between the shoulder blades you'll see two small horizontal lines and a much larger one on top which seems to be curved. Wrinkles don't naturally curve like that between two points of tension and because of this it's suggested that it shows the outline of a vest.

The problem is, it isn't a curved line. It just seems that way because of the properties of a wrinkle and the angle of light.

A wrinkle is like a wave with a rounded crest. Just look at the drapes on any window and it will become apparent what I'm talking about.

The large wrinkle on the top is actually going straight across but because light is illuminating more of the crest of the wrinkle on the left side rather than the right, the shadow drops as it goes to the left, and you're interpreting this drop in the shadow as the wrinkle droping to the left and hence curved.
 

Back
Top Bottom