Was Building 7 Pulled?

[Redwood]

Originally Posted by Fonebone
Here is an elevator penthouse in a controlled demolition.
Let's compare this deliberate implosion with the WTC7 penthouse-

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting...cf0bf32a9d.gif

You mean this building implosion which was initiated with ear shattering, camera rattling detonations and in which the "penthouse" went down basically the same moment the facade began to collapse? Well, the similarities to WTC7 are obvious: both were buildings, both collapsed.

Kinda funny how truthers never include the sound, ain't it?

 

[Redwood]

Am I the only one who's ever noticed that some of the columns of WTC 7 remained standing after the facade collapsed, reminiscent of the "spires" in WTC 1&2 ? This shows that the troofer claim that the columns had to "fail simultaneously is empirically false. These screen shots, taken from Richard Gage's own "Blueprint for Truth" 2008 presentation, show this. Apparently, Dickie has never noticed. You can see it in other videos.

Copy the photos and scroll through them and you can easily see the collapsing surviving column. The times in the Gage videos are in the screen captures.

ETA: It also seems that the North facade collapsed ahead of the rest of it, opposite the large gash in the South facade. (Or, it may possibly be obscured by smoke and dust.)

 

[mike3]

Am I the only one who's ever noticed that some of the columns of WTC 7 remained standing after the facade collapsed, reminiscent of the "spires" in WTC 1&2 ? This shows that the troofer claim that the columns had to "fail simultaneously is empirically false. These screen shots, taken from Richard Gage's own "Blueprint for Truth" 2008 presentation, show this. Apparently, Dickie has never noticed. You can see it in other videos.

Copy the photos and scroll through them and you can easily see the collapsing surviving column. The times in the Gage videos are in the screen captures.

ETA: It also seems that the North facade collapsed ahead of the rest of it, opposite the large gash in the South facade. (Or, it may possibly be obscured by smoke and dust.)

Took me a little bit to see it... but dang, you're right! You can see the same thing with the two big towers as well!

Nice find!

 

[Clayton Moore]

Am I the only one who's ever noticed that some of the columns of WTC 7 remained standing after the facade collapsed, reminiscent of the "spires" in WTC 1&2 ? This shows that the troofer claim that the columns had to "fail simultaneously is empirically false. These screen shots, taken from Richard Gage's own "Blueprint for Truth" 2008 presentation, show this. Apparently, Dickie has never noticed. You can see it in other videos.

Copy the photos and scroll through them and you can easily see the collapsing surviving column. The times in the Gage videos are in the screen captures.

ETA: It also seems that the North facade collapsed ahead of the rest of it, opposite the large gash in the South facade. (Or, it may possibly be obscured by smoke and dust.)

Nice find!! Your find, that only almost all the columns failed fail simultaneously, is intriguing to say the very least. On par with WTC7 not falling at free fall speed, only close to free fall speed.

 

[Redwood]

Originally Posted by Redwood
Am I the only one who's ever noticed that some of the columns of WTC 7 remained standing after the facade collapsed, reminiscent of the "spires" in WTC 1&2 ? This shows that the troofer claim that the columns had to "fail simultaneously is empirically false. These screen shots, taken from Richard Gage's own "Blueprint for Truth" 2008 presentation, show this. Apparently, Dickie has never noticed. You can see it in other videos.

Copy the photos and scroll through them and you can easily see the collapsing surviving column. The times in the Gage videos are in the screen captures.

Took me a little bit to see it... but dang, you're right! You can see the same thing with the two big towers as well!

Nice find!

Kind of funny, what with Troofers going over every video with a fine-tooth comb looking for anomalies, that none ever noticed this! Confirmation bias, maybe?

I should also edit my ETA for clarity:

ETA: It also seems that part of the North facade collapsed ahead of the rest of it the North facade, opposite the large gash in the South facade. (Or, it may possibly be obscured by smoke and dust.)

 

[Redwood]

Originally Posted by Redwood
Am I the only one who's ever noticed that some of the columns of WTC 7 remained standing after the facade collapsed, reminiscent of the "spires" in WTC 1&2 ? This shows that the troofer claim that the columns had to "fail simultaneously is empirically false. These screen shots, taken from Richard Gage's own "Blueprint for Truth" 2008 presentation, show this. Apparently, Dickie has never noticed. You can see it in other videos.

Nice find!! Your find, that only almost all the columns failed fail simultaneously, is intriguing to say the very least. On par with WTC7 not falling at free fall speed, only close to free fall speed.

Only troofies believe that all the WTC 7 columns "failed simultaneously". Obviously, the columns underneath the east penthouse failed first, followed by a wave of failures propagating to the west. You can even see that the west penthouse started to fall before the facade collapsed. The "spire" columns that survived longer (a la the Twin Towers) than the facade merely show the chaotic nature of the collapse. They appear to be from the east facade.

 

[1337m4n]

So you're saying that since it looks like a CD, that it doesn't matter if you can't explain any aspect of how that CD occured, it just is one?

Did I sum that up properly?