Warning: Jackchit threatens Gravy!

Status
Not open for further replies.
1) did jackchit really say he was glad his wife died so he could do 9/11 research?

2) or did this reaaaally happen is this just more Twoofer delusional behavior?

3) If 1 is real and he spends all his time researching 9/11 I would not be suprised if he never leaves the house....lol......a neighbor could have called. If there was really ever a call at all.....

4) If 1 is real and he devotes all his time to 9/11 I have a feeling he can't afford a ticket to get across the pond.

5) Unless maybe Dylan and the LC war chest will fund the flight.

6) or....if JC sells his action figure collection to buy a ticket what's going to happen to his kids once he's arrested for assault or whatever. Sounds like someone isn't thinking about his kids.

7) Unless.....maybe the LC war chest is making promises to take care of kids if something is done to the enemy of the movement and JC sacrifices himself....to include knowing when this would take place and have a video camera on the ready to due some nice video editiing and quote mining to show how mean and ruthless the Jrefers are and the extents we will go to keep them quiet :rolleyes: .......although this isn't a real assumption since the LC team is only in it for the money and wouldn't do anything "real" to jeopardize their movement towards the cash

However with all that said.....I personally believe that Jackchit is full of chit. I doubt he was married......nevermind his wife dying.....If I'm wrong then he isn't that swift going after/making threats to some random person that didn't do anything to him. The thread in the LC fourms have people now believing that Gravy did it and JC has no proof. He's just taking one of, if not the most pubic face of 9/11 skeptics and attacking him verbally.

The whole thing is laughable.....the bowel movement is constantly losing steam even with new "smoking gun" movies and sh***y actors jumping on board. I think they are just getting pi**ed off because the writing is on the wall. Soon it will all be over.....nobody will care about them....nobody will remember them. The thought of having to actually move on and have lives is scarey to them. Not too mention that the LC folks will be counting all their money and doing this :dc_biggrin: all the way to the bank.

Anyways....to sum up.....Jackchit is either a liar.....or he's nuts.....or both. Nothing will come out of this cause I'm sure he's just a coward looking for attention. Oh and by the way Jack if you read this.....I'm saying this...me alone......with no influence from my "spiritual leader" lmao. If you had any stones at all you would post your grade school threats in a place they can be responded to. I can't stop laughing at you.....I'm going to end up with hiccups at this rate.
 
Last edited:
Retract that or be reported.
I used the quote feature and quoted your entire post, both times.
You have accused me of dishonesty. You may have edited your post after I quoted you. If so, that may or may not be an honest mistake on your part.
You, sir, are an a$$
I see you posted 3 minutes after my edit. You may have missed it.
I'm not sure where your bitterness comes from, or why you think you can call me a CTer just because you don't agree with me, but report away.
make sure you report your last post as well.
You are the first person I will put on ignore. feel free to do the same with me.
 
i agree the threat (as most truther threats) is likely an empty one, but this is just the most recent in a long line of similar behavior

how many here have been threatened with physical violence for disagreeing with a truther?

how many here have been libeled and/or slandered by truthers?

how many others have been libeled or slandered as mass murderers, or accessories to murder?

how often have truthers advocated violence against those who disagree?

how often have they advocated and even discused inciting armed revolution?


i think they all need to learn the internet is not anonymous, and laws still apply, even to the noble bringers of the truth
 
Good question. In the thread he posted a link to there's nothing indicating that Mark contacted anybody.

Must be because he's the most vocal debunker.

I think it's because Gravy is the most accessible. Jack wants to punish someone. He probably doesn't care who it is. That is obvious because he is punishing no one but himself.
 
All of you folks trying to play internet psychologist need to step back a second and think through the venting of anger that went into that post. I suspect that the intensity of emotion will recede in time.

DR

It doesn't matter what the truth of his personal situation is, or what his state of mind is. He needs to withdraw his threat, right away.

I've been posting to that effect on LC. I've told them that this is going to do them massive harm. They Just Don't Get It.
 
i agree the threat (as most truther threats) is likely an empty one, but this is just the most recent in a long line of similar behavior

how many here have been threatened with physical violence for disagreeing with a truther?

how many here have been libeled and/or slandered by truthers?

how many others have been libeled or slandered as mass murderers, or accessories to murder?

how often have truthers advocated violence against those who disagree?

how often have they advocated and even discused inciting armed revolution?


i think they all need to learn the internet is not anonymous, and laws still apply, even to the noble bringers of the truth


How often has Troy in WV made threats against people?

Why is his behaviour condoned?
 
Tonic:

Thanks for posting my reference to columbine.

Are you saying then, that we should ignore threats online to cause other people harm.

Should the people who were online with the guy in the UK who killed himself online simply have ignored him...treat it as "mouthing off"?

you are insane, and reprehensible, if you are saying that overt threats of violence on line should be ignored.

Columbine had warning signs...they were ignored.

TAM:)
 
DR:

I respect your call for thinking all this through. However, Jackchit has shown a pattern of posting this type of "venting", and his online persona seems very unstable.

To pay no attention to it, is to ask for a columbine. To ask for another montreal... In this day and age we can no longer ignore these type of threats. Vent in private, not on a public forum.

TAM:)

TAM, you are the doctor. I understand your reservations, and your default caution.

I refuse to ascribe to the Cult of the Victim theory on how to live my life. I think giving undue legitimacy to what looked to me like a rant/vent is giving a troll more due than he is worth.

I am also aware that such an assessment is not guaranteed infallible. Life's full of dangers. There is no need to run around scared . . . or the bullies and terrorists win.

That said, I trust Gravy to do his own risk assessment and I suspect that he, being a New Yawker, will come up with a reasoned approach. Unlike much of the Troofer movement, he's not an idiot.

DR
 
Nope.

I understand this person's sentiment about "you screw with my family, you are toast" completely.

What puzzles me is how he can link harassment from Child Services to a particular internet forum discussion. I'd say he's a fool to make a public threat. Either take care of business, in terms of walk softly and carry a big stick, or STFU. I don't think Gravy is in any danger.

All of you folks trying to play internet psychologist need to step back a second and think through the venting of anger that went into that post. I suspect that the intensity of emotion will recede in time.

DR


I can understand the basic sentiment in the original poster as well (although I do not condone it), what I cannot understand is Dylan's encouragement and apparent escalation of this. That to me is the inexcusable issue here.
 
He needs to withdraw his threat, right away.
I agree with what he, jackchit, ought to do. I also seem to recall the exact wording being dialogue in a movie. (The bit about looking into my eyes and that being the last thing you see) I just can't recall the movie reference.

DR
 
How often has Troy in WV made threats against people?

Why is his behaviour condoned?

I have no idea what you're talking about. If he's threatened to track people down and kill them, then

  1. He's an idiot
  2. He's doing his cause a lot of harm
Jackchit is going to do a lot of harm with this, but nobody more than himself.
 
Headhunter @ LCF said:
JREF's reached out beyond the net and touches Jack where he lives, with a real life threat to separate him from his children.

In response, he wants to reach out and touch the JREF's.

I think the best way to go at it is to find out everything about Mark Roberts, were he works, lives, the whole gambit, and make his life miserable.

As to the JREF member who actuall DID the deed, that's the guy I'd be going after as well, to punch his lights out.

Someone mentioned his user name over there. What else can be found out about him?

Anyone else besides me grabbing screencaps?
 
I find it absolutely insane that someone can say that calling S.S. because you feel that a childs welfare might be at risk, is equated with the "lowest of the lows".

says alot about the thought processes.

TAM:)
 
That said, I trust Gravy to do his own risk assessment and I suspect that he, being a New Yawker, will come up with a reasoned approach. Unlike much of the Troofer movement, he's not an idiot.

DR

I'd agree that there is very unlikely to be any real threat. However, it's for just one person to decide, and how he deals with it is entirely up to him.

I'd like to extend my personal sympathies. It's not very pleasant to deal with this kind of thing.
 
Why oh why do people post personal information about themselves on the Internet? Check out Mr. Holmes website and blog:

http://www.beckhamcoverup.com/

Seems someone threatend his life recently:

This guys talking rubbish. We never went to Maltby Police Station and we did not sanction the selling of the PC's. All information on them is our property. This guy has ruined me, turned me desperate.

I can honestly say the only time his name will be in print is in the obituaries. SOON.
27 March 2007 12:37

Obviously, the guilty party here is David Beckham.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom