Waleed A Alshehri - new evidence

I also read on your site Mike:

Mr. CANNISTRARO: The investigation, at the end of the day, after all of the polygraphs, all of the field work, all of the cross-checking, the intelligence work, concluded that they probably did not have advanced knowledge of 9/11.

If he says they did not have foreknowledge, then the claim they had some is blown up. They were spies but no foreknowledge. I choose to believe Cannistraro.

Nice work mike, as usual!

Good night.

B
 
Another abdulaziz alomari was alleged to be involved who was later found to be innocent:
As I've said many times, these people don't have to prove that they're innocent ... they're alive, that's why they're not the hijackers!! In the BBC story the guy was talking like he'd been accused of being a terrorist, and it's like, even if they got the terrorist's name wrong, the terrorist was vapourised, obviously this guy isn't a terrorist.

(Sorry, this whole alive hijackers thing really gets my goat. Jesus, as if in a conspiracy theory you'd pin a suicide attack on someone who wasn't dead!
 
Waleed A and Waleed M are two separate individuals, and the Saudi pilot story provides no evidence whatsoever that the hijacker is still alive.

And neither the FBI nor anything you have posted provides any evidence whatsoever that the planes were hijacked by who you say they were. Remember, it is your obligation to prove not only that these men were on the planes, but that they carried out the hijackings as well. You haven't done that-- not by a long shot, and you never will.

Sorry, but just disproving the "still-alive hijacker" evidence isn't enough.
 
Actually it isnt up to us, it is up to the FBI, and the procecuters in any legal matters concerning the criminal case.

To me the FBI have proven their case. To a judge, the procecuters did it as well.

TAM:)
 
Good job once again, Mike!

So A-Train, you think that these guys who trained for the hijacking, trained on large jet flight simulators, became licensed pilots, had 757 piloting aids at their last places of residence, boarded the planes, and in some cases were named by seat row and number as hijackers by flight crew,

weren't the hijackers?

But others on board were? People described as Middle Eastern? People who had Arabic accents? Pull up the passenger and crew lists, A-Train. Let us know who your suspects are, and the evidence you have against them. Fair enough?
 
It never, ever fails to amaze me...

... just how many Troothers hang around here after being debunked into oblivion, reading everything, keeping silent, waiting for someone to tread upon on their own, special, pet delusion. And then when it happens, they immediately launch a defense, consisting of "nuh-uh!" and shifting the burden of proof, goalposts, or both simultaneously.

Quite a fascinating social phenomenon, really.
 
Yeah, and strangely enough, the closer they get to the truth, the more it resembles the official version.
There is a huge but subtle difference between the official version (incompetence, bad organization) and LIHOP theories. In the first case, it's not your faul. In the second one, you comit a crime.

I'm not afraid to get closer to the truth, if I can find evidence they deliberately let the attacks unfold.

Busherie
 
And neither the FBI nor anything you have posted provides any evidence whatsoever that the planes were hijacked by who you say they were. Remember, it is your obligation to prove not only that these men were on the planes, but that they carried out the hijackings as well. You haven't done that-- not by a long shot, and you never will.

Sorry, but just disproving the "still-alive hijacker" evidence isn't enough.
I never said it was, A-Train. This is a thread primarily about Waleed A Alshehri, and how he is not Waleed M Alshehri, so I think you're expecting too much. Or setting up a neat straw man.

Either way, I'm sorry you find this evidence insufficient. But don't give up. I've not finished yet.
 
There is a huge but subtle difference between the official version (incompetence, bad organization) and LIHOP theories. In the first case, it's not your faul. In the second one, you comit a crime.

I'm not afraid to get closer to the truth, if I can find evidence they deliberately let the attacks unfold.

Busherie
Are you afraid to get closer to the truth if you can't?
 
Nice work Mike.

The guys across at LC are disusing this but as yet have offered no counter argument but prefer to simply slag off the Jref forum. I'm sure once somebody tells them what to say they will come back with a substantial counter argument but at the moment it is better to simply pretend it is all one bring conspiracy designed to suppress their voices.

Posted by Citizen Merc

Apparently, Jref won't allow myself or Craig to post on their forums.

Mike Williams of 911myths.com posted some very dubious info, I'd like to respond to. Or debunk rather.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77984

Could you perhaps speak with your admins there and lift the unwarranted suspension on Craig. Or allow me to post there?

What are they so scared of?

and again he asks

And Craig was suspended because Calcus and Bobert are clinically insane and stalked him.

No I want to respond there.

Tell them get up their nerves and let us back in.

I tried signing up using my real name. yet they knew and put a stop to it.

Why are they so scared?

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6296

:boxedin:
 
Nice work Mike.

The guys across at LC are disusing this but as yet have offered no counter argument but prefer to simply slag off the Jref forum. I'm sure once somebody tells them what to say they will come back with a substantial counter argument but at the moment it is better to simply pretend it is all one bring conspiracy designed to suppress their voices.

Posted by Citizen Merc



and again he asks



http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6296

:boxedin:
:aaa! EEEK! It's Citizen Merc!
 
So A-Train, you think that these guys who trained for the hijacking, trained on large jet flight simulators, became licensed pilots, had 757 piloting aids at their last places of residence, boarded the planes, and in some cases were named by seat row and number as hijackers by flight crew,

weren't the hijackers?

But others on board were? People described as Middle Eastern? People who had Arabic accents? Pull up the passenger and crew lists, A-Train. Let us know who your suspects are, and the evidence you have against them. Fair enough?

The key phrase in your post, Gravy, is these guys. Your problem is you have not shown that the these guys enrolling in Arizona flight schools or showing up on Jack Abramoff's casino cruise ship are the same these guys who actually hijacked the planes-- or if any of the these guys you are referring to were really who they passed themselves off as.

Identity theft is obviously a very common occurrence. Here in America, however, we assume someone will steal our credit card, load up on some goodies at the mall, and that will be the end of it. That identities can be stolen by a professional intelligence agency to "sheep dip" numerous innocent men as part of an elaborate frame-up operation is for the most part beyond our comprehension. It's not part of our history, or our character. It seems too diabolical for any human to contemplate. Even the most depraved of American criminals will rarely attempt to frame an enemy for their own crime; and when they do, they usually do a poor job of it.

Others around the world, however, are more familiar with the technique. They've tried to tell us it was used on 9/11, but we didn't listen. Here's how it worked: you steal the identities of several men from the group you want to frame. You then assign those identities to your own agents, who bear a physical resemblance to the identity theft victims. (You are aware, Gravy, that there are people of the Middle East who are of course "Middle Eastern looking"-- but who neither Arab nor Muslim.) These agents are then sent to the US to engage in activities which, after the fact, will make it look like the "Arabs" were plotting the crime of the century.

Meanwhile, another group is also being sheep-dipped in a different way. American looking and acting agents are inserted into friendly American companies, to play the role of bright eyed, bushy tailed young corporate executives. These men also play a role in the hijackings, but any suspicion is diverted because of their clean cut appearance.

And finally, a third group present on the planes is the genuine Arab patsies. Satam Suqami is an example. That explains why he arrived in the US in April 2001, depite the fact that "he" was already here. These have been manipulated onto the flights, but their only role in the hijackings-- as apparently is the case with Suqami-- is to have their brains blown out by the real hijackers at the onset of the hijacking.

You want to see the passenger lists? You want to know who my suspects are? Let's look at the manifest for AAL11:

http://www.1918redsox.com/aa11.htm

Now let's look at the best evidence we have from an eyewitness on the plane who relayed the seat numbers of the hijackers:

http://www.boston.com/news/packages/underattack/news/planes_reconstruction.htm

Betty Ong relays that the hijackers came from seats 9A, 9B, 1A, and 2A. She also reports an injured passenger in seat 10B. Here we have all three elements I described above:

Danny Lewin in seat 9B: a former Sayerat Metkal commando who magically tranformed himself overnight into a Boston internet billionaire.

Edmund Glazer
in seat 9A: CFO of MRV Communications.

"Wail and Waleed Alshehri" in seats 1A and 2A. Both men are reported to be still alive after 9/11. Can it be proven that the men in these seats were really the Alshehri brothers?

Satam Suqami in seat 10B: Reported to have volunteered for a suicide mission while attending a Bin Laden camp. His tragic life comes to a pathetic end when he is apparently executed by the hijackers when the plane is commandeered.
 
it is your obligation to prove not only that these men were on the planes, but that they carried out the hijackings as well. You haven't done that-- not by a long shot, and you never will.
Still don't understand who must show evidence? Well anyway, in honor of your return...

albert0suckuq5.jpg


Shave your back :)
 
Wait a minute, for years Jim Fetzer, Steven Jones, David Ray Griffin et al have been saying the hijackers were not on any passenger lists. Now you are saying they were. Have you informed them of this?

Have Jones and Griffin really been saying this? I didn't think Jones ever talked about anything but the tower collapses. I read two of Griffin's books and I don't remember him saying anything about passenger lists.

As for Fetzer, he's a clown and a disinformationalist, in my book.

Anyway, I don't care what any of these people said or are saying. I do my own research and have my own ideas. Why don't you address the points I made in my posts instead of dragging these guys into it?
 
Good job once again, Mike!

So A-Train, you think that these guys who trained for the hijacking, trained on large jet flight simulators, became licensed pilots, had 757 piloting aids at their last places of residence, boarded the planes, and in some cases were named by seat row and number as hijackers by flight crew,

weren't the hijackers?

But others on board were? People described as Middle Eastern? People who had Arabic accents? Pull up the passenger and crew lists, A-Train. Let us know who your suspects are, and the evidence you have against them. Fair enough?


I must say, Gravy, I'm disappointed with you. Such a vigorous challenge to me to lay out my evidence and name my suspects. I have done so, only to see you have fled the scene of the debate.

But while I have your attention-- or not-- let me address the fact that numerous callers from the planes described the hijackers as "Middle Eastern looking." Without doubt they were Middle Eastern men, but do you really consider that compelling evidence that this description constitutes compelling evidence that these men were the al-Qaeda Arabs you say they were?

Certainly you are aware that there are countries and peoples in the Middle East that are not Arab, and not Muslim, but who share the dark skin and features of their Arab-Muslim neighbors. Think how easy it is for us to mistakenly assume that such a person is an Arab terrorist, especially if he is intentionally trying to portray himself as such.

For example, look at the image in this link:

http://www.scar.utoronto.ca/~msa/issues/Palestine/MultiMedia/pictures/crimes/crazy_israeli_soldier_look_into_eyes.jpg

If the man in the photo were on a plane playing the role of an Arab hijacker, would you be able to tell that he might not be an Arab or Muslim at all?

We Americans immediately assume that an "Middle Eastern looking" man involved in a terrorism-related act must be a Muslim. This tendency on our part can be exploited by the real terrorists to frame their Arab enemies. For example, immediately after the attacks the media reported that several "Middle Eastern looking" men were seen celebrating the burning towers. I remember that quite vividly. I remember clenching my fists in anger and wishing the worst to happen to everyone in the Muslim world-- who had obviously perpetrated the attacks and done the celebrating.

Like most Americans, I had fallen for the bait. I had assumed that the celebrating men were Arab-Muslims. As it turned out, the media had not really lied. The men were indeed "Middle Eastern." They were Israeli military veterans and several happened to have the dark skin and features associated with Arabs. The media, however, didn't clue us in on that fact until much later, and even then the mainstream media ignored the story.

Meanwhile, the Arab-Muslim world was successfully "framed" for the celebrations, thanks to the general ignorance of ordinary Americans like me, and the mainstream media's complicity in telling their half-truth.

Can we at least consider the possibility that the same technique was used regarding the "Middle Eastern looking" men who, we both agree, hijacked the planes?

Here is a link to the Israeli men on TV telling their story. Note how genuinely Arab-looking the middle one is.

DancingIsraelis on Israeli TV

If nothing else, Gravy, I hope the above argument will dissuade you from using the "Middle Eastern looking" argument your attempts to show the hijackers were who you say they were.

Gravy? Are you listening? Are you still here?
 

Back
Top Bottom