So A-Train, you think that these guys who trained for the hijacking, trained on large jet flight simulators, became licensed pilots, had 757 piloting aids at their last places of residence, boarded the planes, and in some cases were named by seat row and number as hijackers by flight crew,
weren't the hijackers?
But others on board were? People described as Middle Eastern? People who had Arabic accents? Pull up the passenger and crew lists, A-Train. Let us know who your suspects are, and the evidence you have against them. Fair enough?
The key phrase in your post, Gravy, is
these guys. Your problem is you have not shown that the
these guys enrolling in Arizona flight schools or showing up on Jack Abramoff's casino cruise ship are the same
these guys who actually hijacked the planes-- or if any of the
these guys you are referring to were really who they passed themselves off as.
Identity theft is obviously a very common occurrence. Here in America, however, we assume someone will steal our credit card, load up on some goodies at the mall, and that will be the end of it. That identities can be stolen by a professional intelligence agency to "sheep dip" numerous innocent men as part of an elaborate frame-up operation is for the most part beyond our comprehension. It's not part of our history, or our character. It seems too diabolical for any human to contemplate. Even the most depraved of American criminals will rarely attempt to frame an enemy for their own crime; and when they do, they usually do a poor job of it.
Others around the world, however, are more familiar with the technique. They've tried to tell us it was used on 9/11, but we didn't listen. Here's how it worked: you steal the identities of several men from the group you want to frame. You then assign those identities to your own agents, who bear a physical resemblance to the identity theft victims. (You are aware, Gravy, that there are people of the Middle East who are of course "Middle Eastern looking"-- but who neither Arab nor Muslim.) These agents are then sent to the US to engage in activities which, after the fact, will make it look like the "Arabs" were plotting the crime of the century.
Meanwhile, another group is also being sheep-dipped in a different way. American looking and acting agents are inserted into friendly American companies, to play the role of bright eyed, bushy tailed young corporate executives. These men also play a role in the hijackings, but any suspicion is diverted because of their clean cut appearance.
And finally, a third group present on the planes is the genuine Arab patsies. Satam Suqami is an example. That explains why he arrived in the US in April 2001, depite the fact that "he" was already here. These have been manipulated onto the flights, but their only role in the hijackings-- as apparently is the case with Suqami-- is to have their brains blown out by the real hijackers at the onset of the hijacking.
You want to see the passenger lists? You want to know who my suspects are? Let's look at the manifest for AAL11:
http://www.1918redsox.com/aa11.htm
Now let's look at the best evidence we have from an eyewitness on the plane who relayed the seat numbers of the hijackers:
http://www.boston.com/news/packages/underattack/news/planes_reconstruction.htm
Betty Ong relays that the hijackers came from seats 9A, 9B, 1A, and 2A. She also reports an injured passenger in seat 10B. Here we have all three elements I described above:
Danny Lewin in seat 9B: a former Sayerat Metkal commando who magically tranformed himself overnight into a Boston internet billionaire.
Edmund Glazer in seat 9A: CFO of MRV Communications.
"Wail and Waleed Alshehri" in seats 1A and 2A. Both men are reported to be still alive after 9/11. Can it be proven that the men in these seats were really the Alshehri brothers?
Satam Suqami in seat 10B: Reported to have volunteered for a suicide mission while attending a Bin Laden camp. His tragic life comes to a pathetic end when he is apparently executed by the hijackers when the plane is commandeered.