Wake Up Call To All Truthers

Clayton Moore said:
Another individual FACT that, by itself, makes 9/11 a false flag operation.


http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fematape.html



http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0406/S00031.htm
Click to expand...

Why the links to the comedy sites? How long will it be before you truthers are triumphant and the guilty parties brought to book and the history books rewritten? In your lifetime? At the speed that you are making it would probably take many lifetimes. Actually, never. Enjoy your hobby.
 
Mudcat said:
I was hoping to be provided with a link, though. Tried to google 'FEMA 9/11' and got a bunch of CT rot for my trouble.
Click to expand...

Rot is all they have, what else did you expect? I'm looking forward to the next ten years of truther failures and hopefully some new crackpot theories. Do you think this will die out when they do or will their children be brainwashed into it?

''991 was an inside job!''

''That's right son, you tell the world,just like my daddy taught me to. The Dogpatches have always been truthers and truthers we will always be!''
 
Last edited:
lugnutz said:
This 'crime' has cost untold thousands of lives, and damaged the rights of all americans. I do not consider this trivial. Just the mere fact that you've been lied to should be enough for you to demand the truth. Keep doing what you've been doing, and it will soon be too late. This is not a laughing matter.
Click to expand...

Do you realize how long we've been hearing that it will be soon, and it's just a matter of time, blah blah blah?

We've yet to see anything yet. When do you anticipate this occuring?
 
Clayton Moore said:
For instance, if the confiscated Pentagon videos were released and showed a missile hit the Pentagon, badda bing.
Click to expand...

Excellent example of precisely what I was talking about. For the sake of argument, let's say that someone did produce such a video, claiming it showed the Pentagon being hit by a missile. Off the top of my head, I can think of multiple explanations that have nothing to do with false-flag operations, to whit (in more or less decending order of likelihood):

  • The video is fake.
  • The camera is faulty, and what looks to the untrained eye like a missile is in fact the plane itself.
  • Terrorists also hit the Pentagon with a missle on 9/11, in addition to hitting it with the plane.
  • Completely independent of the goings-on of 9/11, a stray missile coincidentally hit the Pentagon.

However far-fetched some of those options may strike you (and admittedly, the last couple are way the hell out there), each one of them represents a possibility at least as viable as the reality-defying array of events that would have to fall perfectly in place to give creedance to the false-flag theory.

Thus even if a video such as you describe were to show up, you still haven't advanced your theory at all, badda bing notwithstanding.

Of course, vastly more likely than any of the above scenarios is the overwhelming likelihood that said video doesn't exist, and that it or any other "significant" finding that contradicts the generally accepted version of 9/11 events continues to reside solely where it always has. Namely in the fervid imaginings of a handful of self-described "truthers" who, despite over a decade of the world's most reasonable efforts to persuade them otherwise, insist upon wasting their lives promoting sheer nonsense.
 
Stellafane said:
Excellent example of precisely what I was talking about. For the sake of argument, let's say that someone did produce such a video, claiming it showed the Pentagon being hit by a missile. Off the top of my head, I can think of multiple explanations that have nothing to do with false-flag operations, to whit (in more or less decending order of likelihood):

  • The video is fake.
  • The camera is faulty, and what looks to the untrained eye like a missile is in fact the plane itself.
  • Terrorists also hit the Pentagon with a missle on 9/11, in addition to hitting it with the plane.
  • Completely independent of the goings-on of 9/11, a stray missile coincidentally hit the Pentagon.

However far-fetched some of those options may strike you (and admittedly, the last couple are way the hell out there), each one of them represents a possibility at least as viable as the reality-defying array of events that would have to fall perfectly in place to give creedance to the false-flag theory.

Thus even if a video such as you describe were to show up, you still haven't advanced your theory at all, badda bing notwithstanding.

Of course, vastly more likely than any of the above scenarios is the overwhelming likelihood that said video doesn't exist, and that it or any other "significant" finding that contradicts the generally accepted version of 9/11 events continues to reside solely where it always has. Namely in the fervid imaginings of a handful of self-described "truthers" who, despite over a decade of the world's most reasonable efforts to persuade them otherwise, insist upon wasting their lives promoting sheer nonsense.
Click to expand...

http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/196559.html

Badda bing.
It's
 
lugnutz said:
We will not back down from the evil you represent. There are so many lies surrounding the official account of that day, that for you to defend it shows how corrupt you are. There can be no good reason for preventing or hindering a new investigation, and for those of you who do, how can you justify this?
Click to expand...

Much of that evil is supported by the main stream media which has steadfastly ignored the truth of 9/11.


Even the story of the Truth Movement is pretty much ignored. One would think the msm would be eager to debunk all the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Not a whisper. That's how liars succeed. The fewer people who know about the possibility that a lie is in progress the less likely the liars will be exposed.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Much of that evil is supported by the main stream media which has steadfastly ignored the truth of 9/11.


Even the story of the Truth Movement is pretty much ignored. One would think the msm would be eager to debunk all the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Not a whisper. That's how liars succeed. The fewer people who know about the possibility that a lie is in progress the less likely the liars will be exposed.
Click to expand...

Would you like some cheese with that whine, Clayton? :D

The reason a new investigation wont take place, is that the twoofers has NO valid evidence that would spark a new investigation. 11 years with this and still nothing. Zero, zilch, nada. Regurgitating old, debunked theories does not count as evidence.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Much of that evil is supported by the main stream media which has steadfastly ignored the truth of 9/11.


Even the story of the Truth Movement is pretty much ignored. One would think the msm would be eager to debunk all the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Not a whisper. That's how liars succeed. The fewer people who know about the possibility that a lie is in progress the less likely the liars will be exposed.
Click to expand...

That is not why the media ignore you. They ignore flat-earthers too.
 
Clayton Moore said:
http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/196559.html

Badda bing.
It's
Click to expand...

Again your post has delivered the goods and proved my point so perfectly that, had I an entire week to scour the internet for a better one, I could scarcely improve upon it. Indeed, at this point readers of this thread may well wonder whether or not you and I are actually working in collusion, just to prove how silly 9/11 truther arguments really are. (The existential "It's" at the end does add a nice enigmatic touch, BTW.)

In reply to my previous thread discussing a hypothetical video of a missile striking the Pentagon, you post a link to one that doesn't even make it past my first alternate explanation of fakery. You complain that "msm" doesn't take 9/11 truther arguments seriously; your link provides an excellent example of why this is the case. Why should anyone pay truthers the slightest bit of attention, except perhaps as a novelty act, when this is what's being brought to the table?

I'm fond of analogies, so here's one: Suppose I boldly state that "Alex Jones is who he says he is, or he's Al Queda. Thus any significant fact that contradicts his "official story" proves he's a terrorist." Then when challenged to provide evidence to support my extraordinary claim, I produce an obviously doctored video of Osama bin Laden singing "Me and Mr. Jones" as the two sit together holding hands watching gay porn. Such "evidence" would immediately be dismissed as ludicrous, and rightly so, no matter how many self-congratulatory "badda bings" I added for punctuation. And yet, your link is no less ridiculous.

I guess the only additional comment I'll make is my ongoing mystification concerning why people fake stuff like this. It's one thing to believe in foolish things; people will always have that right and indulge it to an often unhealthy extent. But to actually invent the evidence to back up your foolish beliefs -- what possible good can come of that? I guess I just have to accept that I will never understand it.
 
Stellafane said:
I guess the only additional comment I'll make is my ongoing mystification concerning why people fake stuff like this. It's one thing to believe in foolish things; people will always have that right and indulge it to an often unhealthy extent. But to actually invent the evidence to back up your foolish beliefs -- what possible good can come of that? I guess I just have to accept that I will never understand it.
Click to expand...

My guess is that it's a cognitive dissonance thing. These people believe their twoof so hard that when they can't find evidence to support it, they don't conclude that they are wrong, but rather that the evidence is being hidden. It thus becomes morally ok for them to make up their own evidence, because after all, that's what they know is the twoof.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom