I do not know how well I can do with a full body screen.
We know. You told us that eight months ago and several times since then. You'e promised to research it. Why haven't you done anything about it?
My paranormal claim is detection of medical information through means of extrasensory perception. What you are saying here, is like asking an expert marathon runner to instead enter a swimming competition, just because they swim sometimes and because it is easier for you to stand and watch beside the pool rather than invest on covering the several mile long track. You test the claim that is submitted for testing, and not try to search for something else that is most convenient for you.
It nothing like that at all. In fact that comparison is utter nonsense. You are not an expert at anything. You are an ordinary person making extraordinary claims about having dozens of special abilities, nearly all of which could be tested with minimal effort. You have not tested a single one of those claims in even a rudimentary manner. Instead you insist on choosing an expensive, time-consuming and cumbersome test.
Are you just after the $50K?
A more apt comparison is this that you are claiming to be an incredibly wealthy person. You claim to own priceless works of art, designer clothes, expensive jewelry, exotic cars, a private jet, and a mansion with a dozen people on staff. We ask you to prove it. You could just show us a bank statement and be done with it. Or maybe you could just have your driver/bodyguard show up in a Rolls Royce to drive us to your mansion so we can see the paintings and sculptures.
But no. Instead you we see you getting off the bus wearing Levis, a cheap Wal Mart sweater and costume jewelry (like an ordinary person). You offer to prove your wealth by getting a nose job from the most prestigious plastic surgeon in Beverly Hills and paying in cash. Of course, you can only go when you have some free time. And when the doctor has an appointment. And after you decide on what kind of nose you want. And this assumes, of course, that you are a candidate for surgery since, you know, you might be allergic to anesthesia cuz you've never been put under before.
What I want to know is what happens when you fail the kidney test? Will you retract all of your other claims?
Detecting which of persons is missing a kidney is actually not expensive or complicated.
It depends. Will you accept a person's statement about their kidney status or will you actually require proof?
I can't believe you still expect this to be done without screens. Have you learned nothing in your time here? People with missing kidneys are not randomly distributed across the population. I'm not saying that they are restricted to only certain groups, but you will find more men aged 35 to 45 who are missing kidneys then you will women 18 to 25.
People who have had a nephrectomy are not the same as those who have not. How visible those clues are will depend on their circumstances (timing, why they had the surgery, overall health). It ranges from virtually impossible to detect to painfully obvious.
Besides that, each person in the test knows their kidney count. It will be difficult to keep the subjects from knowing whether they are the target or not. Their demeanor can give you clues.
I am typing them up on my website, but trust me it is a lot of work.
Why haven't you scanned them like you promised? You only viewed five people, right? You have the original forms in a Word document or wherever. How hard is it to fill out the forms in Word and save them off separately? Dr. Carlson was able to sit down at the F-A-C-T meeting and analyze the data quickly enough.
What happened was that no one provided me with reference samples, so I had no way of labeling what I was feeling.
Nonsense. You told us you already had impressions. Besides, you can apparently look at a food and tell us that it can cure cancer or some other disease. Why can't you look at a medicine with a
known effect and tell us what it does?
You failed the pill test just like you failed the test reading people through pictures. You failed the lactobacillus test. You failed the in-person readings at F-A-C-T. You failed in your "study" to be any more accurate that ordinary people doing the same thing. Several of your ghost stories, which you claim to be historically accurate, have been shown to
not be accurate at all. And you failed your own "induced" information tests you posted on your website.
Why can't you admit failure when it is staring you in the face? You have claimed to be open to the idea that this is all your imagination. We have several examples where that's the case, yet you deny it. Why?
All I need to do is have some people I know wear various things and see if I can still claim to see their kidneys. Should be done in a snap.
