Moderated Views on George Galloway.

Tin Foil Timothy said:
I would double check any translations of the Hamas charter. Especially if it's published by right wing Zionists. They have a habit of carefully mistranslating on purpose to bring anti-semitism into it. The classic lie is Ahmadinejad's speech calling to 'remove the Zionist Regime', which was twisted into "Wipe Israel off the Map"
Click to expand...
Too bad only one translator, an Iranian apologist, translated it that way. Iranians themselves seem quite happy with that translation, and Ahmadinejad never denied it AFAIK.

20080310IranIsraelWiped01.jpg


20080310IranIsraelWiped02.jpg


zluhig.jpg


Apparently Iran is full of "right wing Zionist" translators. :rolleyes:

No one is going to prove George Galloway is anti-semitic. Because he isn't. But then anyone who criticizes Israel and the right wing Zionist Movement is always labeled as anti-Semitic by right wing Zionists.
Click to expand...
No he's not anti-semitic, he merely rallies in solidarity with those who are...
 
WildCat said:
Too bad only one translator, an Iranian apologist, translated it that way. Iranians themselves seem quite happy with that translation, and Ahmadinejad never denied it AFAIK.

http://home.mindspring.com/~a.lo/20080310IranIsraelWiped01.jpg

http://home.mindspring.com/~a.lo/20080310IranIsraelWiped02.jpg

http://home.mindspring.com/~a.lo/zluhig.jpg
Click to expand...

I'm no fan of Iran, but I do question the validity of these posters. Some of them look waaay too clear to be photos of outdoor posters.
 
WildCat said:
Too bad only one translator, an Iranian apologist, translated it that way. Iranians themselves seem quite happy with that translation, and Ahmadinejad never denied it AFAIK.

[qimg]http://home.mindspring.com/~a.lo/20080310IranIsraelWiped01.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://home.mindspring.com/~a.lo/20080310IranIsraelWiped02.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://home.mindspring.com/~a.lo/zluhig.jpg[/qimg]

Apparently Iran is full of "right wing Zionist" translators. :rolleyes:


No he's not anti-semitic, he merely rallies in solidarity with those who are...
Click to expand...

:dl:

What a load of photoshopped nonsense. Please don't patronize us with such rubbish. The last one is an especially amateurish attempt.
 
notice how the text of "Israel must be wiped off the map" in the 1st and 2nd poster are literally identical fonts.

fakes. total fakes.
 
parky76 said:
I'm no fan of Iran, but I do question the validity of these posters. Some of them look waaay too clear to be photos of outdoor posters.
Click to expand...
The first 2 photos are from an anti-Israel/pro-Palestinian rally in Tehran on March 9, 2008. The Tehran billboard photo originally appeared in the New York Times here: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/world/middleeast/30iran.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Why don't you inform the NYT of your suspicions?

And note that Ahmadinejad has never disputed the translation.
 
parky76 said:
notice how the text of "Israel must be wiped off the map" in the 1st and 2nd poster are literally identical fonts.

fakes. total fakes.
Click to expand...

For someone who has spend a large amount of time in the conspiracy section, this is quite laughable.

Identical fonts aren't entirely a new breakthrough.
 
Last edited:
WildCat said:
The first 2 photos are from an anti-Israel/pro-Palestinian rally in Tehran on March 9, 2008. The Tehran billboard photo originally appeared in the New York Times here: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/world/middleeast/30iran.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Why don't you inform the NYT of your suspicions?
Click to expand...

:dl:

And now you're using the NYT, a pro-zionist murdoch piece of toilet paper, as a reliable source. That deserves another ...


:dl:

Hilarious. They are total fakes. Anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of graphic editing can see they are fakes.

And the mainstream media is known for using fake pictures. The BBC even got caught using a picture of a pro-Ahmadinejad rally in which they'd cropped off Ahmadinejad himself and published it on their website as an anti-Ahmadinejad proestors. Hilarious. They got caught and had to change the caption and make some whining excuse.

Oh before I compose myself ...

:dl:
 
Tin Foil Timothy said:
And now you're using the NYT, a pro-zionist murdoch piece of toilet paper, as a reliable source. That deserves another ...
Click to expand...

The NY Times is certainly not a pro-Zionist newspaper. Evidently, you are not a Times reader. The Times is consistently critical of Israel and its anti-Israel bias is well-documented.

Oh, and, by the way, you have more egg on your face as the Times is owned by the Sulzberger family, not Murdoch.

In fact, the Sulzbergers were so intent on the Times not being accused of being pro-Zionist, during the Holocaust, they placed the names of the dead Jews well inside the newspaper so as not to appear to be drawing attention to them.

Dude, you really desperately need to get your facts straight.
 
Tin Foil Timothy said:
:dl:

And now you're using the NYT, a pro-zionist murdoch piece of toilet paper, as a reliable source. That deserves another ...


:dl:

Hilarious. They are total fakes. Anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of graphic editing can see they are fakes.

And the mainstream media is known for using fake pictures. The BBC even got caught using a picture of a pro-Ahmadinejad rally in which they'd cropped off Ahmadinejad himself and published it on their website as an anti-Ahmadinejad proestors. Hilarious. They got caught and had to change the caption and make some whining excuse.

Oh before I compose myself ...

:dl:
Click to expand...
Quoted for posterity.
 
I like how the BBC is consistently branded as being pro and anti every conceivable organisatination, ideology and nation on Earth. One day it is pro-Israeli, the next it is pro-Palestinian, and the following week it is anti-American or Pro-Bush.

Brilliant.
 
Undesired Walrus said:
I like how the BBC is consistently branded as being pro and anti every conceivable organisatination, ideology and nation on Earth. One day it is pro-Israeli, the next it is pro-Palestinian, and the following week it is anti-American or Pro-Bush.

Brilliant.
Click to expand...

I know of no rational person who accuses the BBC of being pro-Israel. It's anti-Israel bias is notorious.
 
Undesired Walrus said:
I like how the BBC is consistently branded as being pro and anti every conceivable organisatination, ideology and nation on Earth. One day it is pro-Israeli, the next it is pro-Palestinian, and the following week it is anti-American or Pro-Bush.

Brilliant.
Click to expand...
It's like super-nano-therm*te, it's whatever you want it to be!
 
Marc39 said:
I know of no rational person who accuses the BBC of being pro-Israel. It's anti-Israel bias is notorious.
Click to expand...

See what I mean? The brilliance of the BBC, it can be whatever a partisan wants it be.

When it refused to play the BBC Gaza appeal in order to stay neutral, the far left accused it of being a playground for the Israeli Government. When it got into Gaza, despite the Israeli wishes, it was called an anti-Israeli institution.
 
Last edited:
Galloway. What a guy. :cool: Always speaking up for the people. The zionist propegandists in this thread are getting quite tiring.
 
Wipe off the map sounds like "we will bury you", and ahmadinejad does remind me a lot of khrushchev.
 
NWO Sentryman said:
Wipe off the map sounds like "we will bury you", and ahmadinejad does remind me a lot of khrushchev.
Click to expand...
Actually that quote isn't as sinister as it was made out to be. All it means is that the USSR will be around after the US is gone. "We will survive you" or "outlast you" would have been a better translation.

Of course, quite the opposite happened.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom