Moderated Views on George Galloway.

[MarkCorrigan]

Okay, your opinion.

Is there any evidence that his constituents were really annoyed with him getting all the coverage? I think if anything it may have raised awareness of him more. Even though I dont think it was a good idea for him to do it, for the reasons MarkCorrigan said.

Raised awareness that he was a useless slacking jackass.

There were newspaper reports all over the shop decrying his refusal to do his job in favour of wasting his time with Pete Burns.

The man is a worthless sack of crap.

 

[Zeuzzz]

Another radio quote where george makes absolute sense. Debunk that.

 

[Undesired Walrus]

Is there any evidence that his constituents were really annoyed with him getting all the coverage?

Plenty.



It was utterly disgraceful. He abandoned his constituents, some of the poorest people in the country, the people who voted him in, in order to lie around in bubble baths and pretend to drink milk out of some Z-List's hands. It's just appalling.

And now he's not running for re-election. He ****ed them, and now he's chucked them.

 

[Zeuzzz]

There were newspaper reports all over the shop decrying his refusal to do his job in favour of wasting his time with Pete Burns.

Yes there were indeed, but lets not take what they say too seriously or have our opinion that taken by them shall we? Lets remember he has won three court cases against major British newspapers.

I meant what happened after he went into big brother? Did his constiuents revolt? Sack him?

 

[gtc]

People have a low tolerance for youtube clips, particularly ones which are nearly 10 minutes long. Can you summarise what point he is making and why you think it is good?

 

[Zeuzzz]

*sigh*

What happened here is that I brought up an example of Hamas child abuse, and you deflected by saying 'Well what about those TV shows in Israel eh?'. This is a desperately cowardly diversion, and only one you can get out of if you conclude that the shows in Israel are no big deal.

As you conclude that they are a huge deal, are we right in assuming you thus consider the Hamas TV shows a huge deal too, and that "without them there would be hardly any motivation for people to join the army on patriotic or religous grounds, and a lot less people would see any reason to fight their neighbours?"

*sigh*

Yep, exactly. I'm no Hamas supporter, just like galloway.

 

[gtc]

Sack him?

In the Westminster system, how does one go about sacking their MP? Bearing in mind the first and last election he stood for in Bethnal Green and Bow was in 2005.

 

[Undesired Walrus]

*sigh*

Yep, exactly. I'm no Hamas supporter, just like galloway.

Aside from giving them £25,000. Why didn't he give the money to a charity?

 

[plumjam]

Zeuzzz, you're wasting your time with these propagandized fools.

 

[lionking]

Zeuzzz, you're wasting your time with these propagandized fools.

Huh? How is concluding Galloway is a fool evidence one is propagandized?

 

[richardm]

Yes there were indeed, but lets not take what they say too seriously or have our opinion that taken by them shall we?

Well what chance does that give us? We can show you articles like this

Muhammad Abdul Bari, the chairman of the East London Mosque in Mr Galloway’s Bethnal Green & Bow constituency, said that he had been puzzled to discover that his MP was now appearing on a show that many Muslims would consider indecent. “A lot of Muslims find it very unpalatable that their MP would consider doing this sort of show,” he said.
Dr Bari was considered instrumental in helping Mr Galloway to secure the support of Muslim voters, who make up 40 per cent of the constituency... “It really is very puzzling,” he said. “The community here is very deprived. It needs its local MP."

And you are able to simply dismiss it because "You can't believe what the papers say". It's dangerously close to True Believer stuff. Mind you that's a typical Galloway tactic; he himself dismisses critics by saying that they're people who supported the war and so don't like him anyway, no matter what their criticism is actually about. Small wonder bottled water sales have gone through the roof, he's poisoned most of the wells in the country.

 

[JihadJane]

MarkCorrigan's Asses

HE's a pompous worthless jackass who rode on the coattails of a small party with a powerful message so he could get his corpulent ass back in the limelight. He's a corpulent ass and he has one of the worst records of attendance in the Houses of Parliament.

He went to do Big Brother while serving as an MP for gods sake!

"Worthless jackass", "corpulent ass", "corpulent ass".

By what measure is the Labour party small?

Or are you suggesting there's something wrong with riding one's own "coattails"?

His behavior is no worse and, ethically, much better, than numerous other politicians. Why does he attract so much froth? Because he tells it like it is.

In the sea of moral cowardice that was the submissive, pro-war UK parliament, supposedly stupified by its dumb trust in its leaders' obvious lies, Galloway spoke out for millions in condemning the criminal attack on Iraq for what is was. This act alone negates your ill-considered "worthess jackass "analysis".


He is also reported to have said that Tony Blair and George W. Bush had "lied to the British Air Force and Navy, when they said the battle of Iraq would be very quick and easy. They attacked Iraq like wolves...."

"... the best thing British troops can do is to refuse to obey illegal orders."

Later, he apologized for describing George W. Bush as a "wolf", saying that to do so defamed wolves:

"No wolf would commit the sort of crimes against humanity that George Bush committed against the people of Iraq.”

Very true. Galloway's a gem.

 

[WildCat]

Very true. Galloway's a gem.

Well it's clear he has the trruther vote.

 

[JihadJane]

Well it's clear he has the trruther vote.

Do you want to save some energy and employ me to write your posts for you?

 

[funk de fino]

So considering this is not answering the question of whether George supports or supported sadam hussein, I presume you conceed he does not?

That would be a laughable presumption seen as I posted a video of George showing his support.

And anyone who is a stealth bomber is a patriotic fanatic. Theres no moral difference.

Now you are lying. Not all servicemen are patriots.

 

[funk de fino]

This is the issue here: He does not support Sadam and never really did! He went there to discuss humanitarian issues while the west were selling him guns, and yes, shoock his hand. Big woo.

Wrong again, he went in 94 and shook his hand. After the Gulf war. You really are clueless on this aren't you?

 

[funk de fino]

It should be quite apparent that George lost quite a lot of faith in the parliamentary system, and only voted when he needed to, or when he knew it would count for anything. He was elected by the people. And I saw no public uproar during his time.

Then you do not read papers or watch the news.

That makes a lot of sense.

 

[funk de fino]

I think that having fun and making a tit out of himself in a red leotard is a far worse offense than many MP's comitted recently in the expenses scandal. Some of them broke the law.

It was, however, a good PR move Certainly got him in the headlines.

Making fun of alcohlics, bullying young models and being two faced to other young celebrities.

Very noble.

 

[funk de fino]

"Worthless jackass", "corpulent ass", "corpulent ass".

By what measure is the Labour party small?

Or are you suggesting there's something wrong with riding one's own "coattails"?

His behavior is no worse and, ethically, much better, than numerous other politicians. Why does he attract so much froth? Because he tells it like it is.

In the sea of moral cowardice that was the submissive, pro-war UK parliament, supposedly stupified by its dumb trust in its leaders' obvious lies, Galloway spoke out for millions in condemning the criminal attack on Iraq for what is was. This act alone negates your ill-considered "worthess jackass "analysis".


He is also reported to have said that Tony Blair and George W. Bush had "lied to the British Air Force and Navy, when they said the battle of Iraq would be very quick and easy. They attacked Iraq like wolves...."

"... the best thing British troops can do is to refuse to obey illegal orders."

Later, he apologized for describing George W. Bush as a "wolf", saying that to do so defamed wolves:

"No wolf would commit the sort of crimes against humanity that George Bush committed against the people of Iraq.”

Very true. Galloway's a gem.

His support for Saddam after previously being against him says more than anything you can post here. Calling for arabs to come and fight against british troops is the sign of scum.

he is a two faced lying hypocrite

 

[funk de fino]

Galloway's speech was translated for Hussein, and Anasal-Tikriti, a friend of Galloways and a Respect candidate, spokesman for the Muslim Association of Britain said: "I understand Arabic and it [Galloway's salutation] was taken completely out of context. When he said "you" he meant the Iraqi people, he was saluting their indefatigability, their resolve against sanctions. Even the interpreter got it right and, in Arabic, says salutes the stand of the Iraqi people'

This is by far the biggest crock that has been posted so far. galloway speaks in english. A translation to Saddam means nothing. He said what he said.

Here it is again for those who ignored it earlier. His admission of opposing him previously and his salute to Saddam.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzWNXEtwHUc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fqOVDEI1bU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sy7U8z9cfik&feature=related