Moderated Views on George Galloway.

BTW:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/may/02/nick-cohen-labour-liberal-democrats said:
as of April 2009 (Galloway) had turned up for only one in 20 votes in the last parliament while claiming £136,000 in expenses.
 
So, ignoring all of Galloway's lies, his support of terrorist groups and thugocracies and dictators, the fact he's rarely in Parliament representing the people who elected him, beyond all that he's actually a great man?

And APART from THAT, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
 
I saw the whole thing. He was doing nothing but expressing solidarity for a internationally recognized terrorist organization and its policies of oppression, torture, muder, and genocide.





I don't support it when states do it either. But Galloway supports it when he shares a common enemy with the terrorist group.


Yes, he does. Here's proof:





He supports a terrorist organization (see video above) which has as its stated and written goal genocide of the Jews.

It's hard to get any more anti-semitic than that.


He has a funny way of showing it, giving money to Hamas and all... :rolleyes:

Where does Israel get the money for it's H-bombs?
 
Where does Israel get the money for it's H-bombs?

Isreal has A-bombs. H-bombs is more questionable because we've never encountered a case of anyone managing to build one without doing some testing.
 
IIRC Israel's nuclear program was a joint venture with France.

Not really. There may have been a little tech transfer but not much beyond that. Developing nuclear weapons is not that serious an expense for a modern industrialised nation as south africa showed.
 
Galloway is history. Got his butt kicked last night in the election. One less embrassment for the UK Parliament.
 
A fiver that he blames mysterious "zionists" for his defeat by this time next week.
 
If I see a group of folks with a rope rushing to hang Galloway, I will be in a terrible moral dilemma.

Should I take a nap, or finish that novel I'm reading?
 

Back
Top Bottom