The claim states that I need to see the surface of the body whether they are clothed or not. A flat screen does not give me an exact sense of distance to the person. Also, a screen does block the "vibrational information" that I claim to detect, which is why a partially see-through screen that did allow the outline of the person to be seen, also greatly reduces the quality of the perceptions.
This is a lie. A flat screen can give you the exact distance to the person - all we have to do is place people a few inches from it. How is a screen blocking "vibrational information" but not cloth made from the same material? If you are going to make up supernatural powers, please be consistent with them.
I can not detect a person/no person behind an opaque full-body screen. When I had medical perceptions of a person behind a full-body opaque screen it was because the person was leaning against the screen so I had some sense of where they are, but even at that my orientation in the body was severely thrown off.
Actually, you just stated you can detect someone behind a screen. All we have to do is provide an outline of where they would be placed and set a uniform distance to place the volunteer between the cloth. This fulfills all of the conditions that you claim your power works on, but you won't agree to them because it would provide a easy way to debunk your powers.
I will not do a remote viewing test to detect whether a person is or is not behind a screen. The claim is medical perceptions to detect the number of kidneys in a person, and I do require to see the clothed back of the person.
Thats lovely, but no one is proposing a remote viewing test. People are proposing you use your superpowers to detect organs/tissue/whatever from behind a screen made of the same material that clothes are made from.
By the way, you just typed up another lie - you earlier claimed that you were able to see organs through a screen, although you claimed it was hard because you were "disoriented" (your standard excuse when you fail).
I need an exact sense of where the person is. And I did not fail with the readings of FACT members. I do perceive through clothing, but only when I am looking straight at the surface of the body.
To see persons behind a screen is a claim of remote viewing. My claim is that I need to look at the surface of the person, whether clothed or not, in order for the perceptions to form. As soon as you lift that fabric barrier further from the surface of their skin and make it into a flat screen so that I do not know exactly where things are, the vibrational information is no longer available and my sense of orientation in the body is severely thrown off, and the claim can not perform under those conditions, and under those conditions it can not be tested.
Copying and pasting the same rant isn't going to change any of the facts - that you refuse to do the most simple and easy to set up protocol to test your medical perceptions claim. Its not remote viewing, and you know this. You know, months ago I thought you were just someone with delusions - severe delusions - but I thought you were at least sincere. You've revealed yourself to be a liar and a fraud over and over again though, so I won't make that mistake again.
"Since I don't have said powers" I should be expected to fail at the preliminary test whose protocol has been devised so far and never make it to an official test. We need Ray Hyman! He was able to falsify Natasha Demkina's claim with far less acceptable test conditions and with great courtesy toward the claimant.
No, you are setting up "preliminary tests" where you have a 1/10 chance of getting it right, very good odds. You are also setting them up in ways that are not scientific (not double blind) and that do not follow any reasonable research protocol. You could very well pass it using all the skills other woo con artists use.
At the very least it is able to falsify the claim, right? Since I can't see kidneys through a clothed back, can I? Because no one can, right?
No, it won't. Because you'll never set up a test that actually does this, nor will you agree to a simple test that falsifies the larger amount of your supernatural powers.
Yes you are! You are asking me to see people behind a screen!
And I can not do that unless the person is already leaning against the screen, ie. I would already know that they are there. As for some kind of decoy that produces a compression against the screen, the possible clues of there/not there in this test would be of far greater concern than whether one can see some sort of "magical twitching" and body language on a person's clothed back that reveal the number of kidneys.
No amount of your ranting is going to change the fact that using your superpower xray vision to detect flesh is not "remote viewing". Conditions have been proposed that would meet all of your claimed limitations of your superpower, but you have declined to test under such conditions because you are a fraud.
The study is OVER. I have defined a specific claim and submitted that for testing. I am unable to remote view through a screen.
No its not. Your claims have been all over the place, have changed daily, and you have not submitted any reasonable protocol.
Are we done, LightinDarkness? Or do you want us to go through all of this again?
Nope, were not done. I'm going to keep pointing out your lies and fraud attempts until you start another thread and go through all this again as you do every few months here. And then I'm going to keep debunking you until you put yourself through a real test that proves you have supernatural powers, which is never going to happen.
We are handing those out since we won't be doing a kidney-in-a-box kind of test. Enjoy.
