• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

VFF Preliminary Kidney Detection Test

I wonder if Anita is now using UncaYimmy as her conduit for the Board. She is "too busy to post" but apparently not "too busy" to contact him on a regular basis, in the full knowledge that he will reproduce what she says somehwhere on the Boards.

It may be a new way to get her daily "fix"

Norm

I think it's a little more complicated than that. She's been sending me instant messages since last December. At times I was getting them almost every day. Sometimes I would get multiple Walls o' Text per day. It got so annoying at times that I had to ask her to stop. When she wouldn't, I would block her account for a few days. And just a couple of days ago, VFF de-friended me on Facebook for a second time only to send me a new friend request today. Besides, she posted her today anyway.

At this point if she tells me something that I think is relevant to the audience here, I may choose to disclose it if she doesn't first. She's played this "I don't have time" game plenty of times before. If you really step back and look at everything that's transpired, it's actually deeply disturbing. She has a way of making the now so distracting that folks tend to forget the big picture. I mean, how many people remember that VFF has yet to provide the raw data she promised from the "study" she failed last March/April?
 
how many people remember that VFF has yet to provide the raw data she promised from the "study" she failed last March/April?

I do and I have a test protocol that maybe she will attempt for starters.

Lets see if she can use her "powers' to find her azz with her left hand at least 7 out of 10 times
 
I reminded her over and over about her promise to post the raw data here. I even went so far as to mildly chastise her for not keeping her word, not that it did any good.
 
Unfortunately I am not ready to reveal which Skeptics groups I am contacting about a preliminary test. If arrangements are made to have a test, I will disclose that information then. <snip>

Oh, for heaven's sake.

"I know something you don't know and I'm not going to te-ell..."

Could you be more childish?

UncaYimmy said:
And just a couple of days ago, VFF de-friended me on Facebook for a second time only to send me a new friend request today.

I rescind the question. Apparently you can.
 
Last edited:
Any skeptics group worthy of the name will try to develop a rigorous protocol, and will certainly have members who check the JREF Forum for background info. So switching groups will do VfF no good whatsoever--except enable her to enjoy the attention from yet another prolonged round of negotiations.

Of course, what Anita defines as a group of "skeptics" and what we do may be two very different things. :(
 
I seem to remember VfF proposing a paying public for the 'kidney' test. What happened to that idea?
 
Has the good doctor confirmed this horse's death yet? Is Professor Koenig on call to confirm?
 
Last edited:
She ditched that idea when many posters protested.

It's not the paying that I object to. To be sure trying to exploit unproven abilities for personal financial gains is about pretty tacky. However whats the point in having Anita leave the room when test subjects com in and out when there's a whole bunch of unblinded audience memebrs who could each potentially be an accomplice. It's this factor which transforms something that has the potential to be a robust test into a tacky spectacle with no scientific merit.
 
It's interesting that Anita repeatedly stated that she does not do remote viewing yet on her Alenara site she said:

Those are listed as "interests". I wouldn't assume that she's claiming to be able to do everything on the list.
 
Those are listed as "interests". I wouldn't assume that she's claiming to be able to do everything on the list.

She has directly or indirectly claimed to do every one of those "interests" she listed, and that includes remote viewing. What I was pointing out that is that 10 years ago she was into it, which makes her recent protestations even less credible.
 

Back
Top Bottom