Verifiable, OBJECTIVE evidence of explosives

Seven hours later, the CD was completed. That's some slow-working explosives, jessica! Bwah!

Seriously, will you post the refutation of the Bazant and Greening papers now? If not, why? Don't make this about me. We're all here to learn.

When you understand the paper and dont make unsubstantiated statements like in my sig I will present it.
 
jessica, R. Mackey, professional scientist, has decided to accomodate your wish to only debate professionals. Do you accept? Should we just go ahead and start a thread now?
 
First (of many) problem w/ your document: How can they establish that it was actually filmed on 9/11/01? Where is the unedited version of that video?

And where are the notarized afidavits from the forensic photo lab stating that the video have not been tampered with? There is a reason why video isn't considered evidence in trials anymore......
 
When you understand the paper and dont make unsubstantiated statements like in my sig I will present it.

Translation: I have no clue what I'm talking about. If I had, I would explain why the calculations are wrong.
 
First (of many) problem w/ your document: How can they establish that it was actually filmed on 9/11/01? Where is the unedited version of that video?

Erm is that a serious question? How many days in the past has had new york firefighters calling family, covered in dust and hearing huge explosions. That is the most pathetic question that has been put to me yet.
 
Heres some cracking evidence. Read the pdf file and watch the video it is about It shows the explosion occuring in 7 before the north towere fell. Its a great piece of work:

http://www.savefile.com/files/208209
Okay, I looked through the PDF. This issue was discussed here a few days ago. Just one problem with the paper: the author has no idea what the explosion was or if it had anything to do with WTC 7. If you'll take the time to read the accounts of the the people who were there, you'll find out that there were numerous explosions that day that had nothing to do with WTC 7.
 
jessica, do you accept Mackey's offer? You can list your own credentials any time you like...
 
And where are the notarized afidavits from the forensic photo lab stating that the video have not been tampered with? There is a reason why video isn't considered evidence in trials anymore......

I hope that goes for the OBL confession video and the pics of the hijackers at airports.:D
 
jessica, R. Mackey, professional scientist, has decided to accomodate your wish to only debate professionals. Do you accept? Should we just go ahead and start a thread now?

She's probably still stewing because I nailed her for being a hypocrite.

Whatever.
 
Erm is that a serious question? How many days in the past has had new york firefighters calling family, covered in dust and hearing huge explosions. That is the most pathetic question that has been put to me yet.
GZ was crawling w/ firemen for several months after 9/11. There was demo work going on, heavy equipoment being used. How can you place the date from that video?
 
:popcorn1

You guys need to call the networks and get this show on TV. Or radio or PPV or something. CTists vs. Debunkers is infinitely more entertaining than anything else I could be watching or doing right now.
 
A quik use of the search function drew this quote from beachnut:

hey rabbit, or is it docker?

tell me any CD guy who use thermite to bring down buildings?

then prove to everyone Jones did not start with thermite in his first paper and change when he learned it was never used despite the fact he found thermite in the WTC???

the tell me why you would find thermite in the WTC without it being CD?

hint, there are tons of Al, and plenty of iron rust, and if you want thermate, there are also tons of sulfur in the WTC before 9/11

Al, iron rust, and sulfur all in significant quantities before 9/11

Any ideas why you will never find explosive evidence?

did not think so

Dr Jones what a dolt

can docker/jessicarabbit produce the first paper by Dr Jones before he changed it over and over

and I thought a peer reviewed paper was done, but Jones keep changing his story as he learns he messed up

good luck finding Jones' first paper
 
GZ was crawling w/ firemen for several months after 9/11. There was demo work going on, heavy equipoment being used. How can you place the date from that video?

I have no choice but to believe you are either pulling my leg or you have a learning disability. Tell me that isn't a serious question?

Oh by the way, the guy on the phone is interviewed in a separate vid and does indeed confirm that it was the morning of 9/11.
 
BTW jessica, that "scientific study" you have could only be funnier if it were written in crayon!
 
When you understand the paper and dont make unsubstantiated statements like in my sig I will present it.
So your whole reason for not presenting this information is that you wanted to introduce yourself to me on an internet forum, then, after several hundred posts, reveal that you have this information but won't post it until you get a certain something from me?

That was your plan?

Seriously, jessica, don't make this about me. You say you have important information that should change the way we think, but won't reveal it? And you accuse people here of bad science?

Let's go, jess. This is about knowledge, not about me, right? Right?
 
I have no choice but to believe you are either pulling my leg or you have a learning disability. Tell me that isn't a serious question?

Oh by the way, the guy on the phone is interviewed in a separate vid and does indeed confirm that it was the morning of 9/11.
Oh really? What is his name?

Oh, and I must have missed your credentials somehow. Could you post them again?
 
I have no choice but to believe you are either pulling my leg or you have a learning disability. Tell me that isn't a serious question?

Oh by the way, the guy on the phone is interviewed in a separate vid and does indeed confirm that it was the morning of 9/11.

:dl:

As if nothing else than explosives can explode during a fire.......
 

Back
Top Bottom