Which is more mature and stable against the blowing winds of demagoguery? A system that starts with the observation that a government is, properly speaking, formed by the people and granted certain powers, and none others, and any changes to that require supermajority?
Or a vox populi vox dei system where whoever wins a simple majority (or even just a plurality) assumes all power imaginable?
I'll let you be the judge. Hint: A study of human history is useful.
You explained that much clearer.