• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Val McClatchey's camera identified, contained editing software

Status
Not open for further replies.
CptColumbo said:
In one post you accuse Mrs. McClatchey of performing the edit, in the next (and in some cases the same) post you say it was the FBI, then you accuse the husband. One common trait of liars is inconsistancy.
Click to expand...
Can you prove all this?
 
Killtown said:
Photo may be fake, she had editing software, hmmm.
Click to expand...

...and???

Is that really all you got? Man, you are desperate to smear another person.

What has she done to you? I simply refuse to believe that you pick this woman and start attacking her, based on such desperate speculation. There must be something else.

Don't you realize how much harm you do?
 
Killtown said:
Derrrr.
Click to expand...

That's perfect.

I mean, I kind of picture you saying that a lot when presented with facts, but to actually type it out really brings home the whole "chimpanzee looking at the schematics for the Space Shuttle" type of sound that I will perpetually associate with your name.
 
Killtown said:
2) Only in JREF world.
Click to expand...
wish id known that when i was a kid and my mom asked why my room was a mess, i could have just told her "well it sure wanst an elephant" and been off the hook

Your proof of that?
Click to expand...
youve been told several times what the software is capable of, if you think it could have made the image get a copy, and use it to create a similar image
 
Killtown said:
Care to answer questions 3 and 4?
Click to expand...
Sure.

Question 4 was regarding initial fuel size. Of the two calculations I presented, the first was based on 10,000 gallons. The second did not consider fuel as an independent variable. As we showed over and over, the plume width for those amounts of time is a strong function of the fuel distribution at ignition, not the total amount of fuel. We beat this to death as well, and you didn't get it. You may recall me attempting to explain volatility and aerosol effects to you.

Question 3 is regarding the aircraft's direction of travel. Arkan's post here is an overlay of a picture taken from your blog. Note, carefully, the blue arrow.

Val, in fact, did not ever say or even imply that the aircraft was heading west, the direction of your arrow. All she said is that she heard it "overhead." Since it was flying, this should suprise no one. Nonetheless, you and your brethren chose to misinterpret her, all for the sole purpose of casting maximum doubt and misdirection on her story.

Now that I've answered yours, you answer mine. Did you make that horrible, unbelievable math error, or no?
 
R.Mackey said:
1) Of the two calculations I presented, the first was based on 10,000 gallons.

2) Question 3 is regarding the aircraft's direction of travel. Arkan's post here is an overlay of a picture taken from your blog. Note, carefully, the blue arrow.

3) Val, in fact, did not ever say or even imply that the aircraft was heading west, the direction of your arrow. All she said is that she heard it "overhead." Since it was flying, this should suprise no one. Nonetheless, you and your brethren chose to misinterpret her, all for the sole purpose of casting maximum doubt and misdirection on her story.

4) Did you make that horrible, unbelievable math error, or no?
Click to expand...
1) How many gals did official say 93 crashed with?

2) I thought you said wind direction too. I concede the wind direction as P.M. has it.

3) Wrong... http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_90823.html

4) math error on what?
 
jhunter1163 said:
I wonder if Val would pursue a libel suit if I could get her a lawyer pro bono.
Click to expand...
She apparently issued a cease-and-desist letter once before, so I think it's possible that she would.

Keep in mind, though, there is some evidence that Killtown is a minor.
 
jhunter1163 said:
I wonder if Val would pursue a libel suit if I could get her a lawyer pro bono.
Click to expand...
First you would have to find a private eye who would work pro-bono to find his/her actual identity, since he/she is apparently too much of a coward to put his/her actual reputation where his/her blog is.
But that isn't too difficult.
 
R.Mackey said:
She apparently issued a cease-and-desist letter once before, so I think it's possible that she would.

Keep in mind, though, there is some evidence that Killtown is a minor.
Click to expand...

IMHO, all the more reason to do this. Makesure the parents know what their child is doing, and if they already know then they should be held responsible for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom