swright777
Muse
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2012
- Messages
- 897
I enjoy being the smartest person in the conversation and usually the only honest person.
Only if you're alone, and even then this probably isn't true.
I enjoy being the smartest person in the conversation and usually the only honest person.
...Clayton Moore is saying that vaccine contents, not the vaccine concepts, are damaging people. Damaging the being that has evolved to the present. He is saying that the more the vaccine concept is polluted with additives injected through the skin, for whatever reason, the more likely the human body will be subjected to "breakdown."
Adjuvants do their assigned task but your body doesn't have an exit method for them. Like the mercury of fillings or from tuna the adjuvant substances can mess you up in MYSTERIOUS ways.
In other words your body isn't equipped to deal with many foreign substances that are entered into the body through the skin.
http://www.nvic.org/doctors-corner/Aluminum-and-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx
Giving a vaccine(s) to an unhealthy infant/child is obviously unwise? Why is that?In 1996, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a position paper on Aluminum Toxicity in Infants and Children which stated in the first paragraph, “Aluminum is now being implicated as interfering with a variety of cellular and metabolic processes in the nervous system and in other tissues.[3]
A review of the medical literature on aluminum reveals a surprising lack of scientific evidence that injected aluminum is safe. There is limited understanding of what happens to children when aluminum is injected into their bodies, including whether or not it accumulates in tissues and organs or is properly eliminated from the body. It is also unknown if genetic factors affect long term adverse health outcomes for those injected with aluminum containing vaccines.
Now tell us how a doctor knows whether an infant/child has been/is becoming ill but is symptom-less?
By the way, still waiting for the name of even one of those "vets" you claimed know who gave up their career rather than receive vaccinations.
Let's see. Big pharma and the mainstream media insist vaccines are absolutely safe but close to NONE of the vaccines are tested with a control group. They have convinced much of the American public that questioning the safety of vaccines is criminal.
Yet commercial after commercial airs up front and personal that if you've taken DRUG X, Y, or Z contact my law firm.
I strongly suspect that he was not telling the the truth about that. He will never refer to it again, that his his usual tactic when caught in a lie.
What does this have to do with vaxx causing autism?
Clayton Moore is obsessing with the obvious fact that vaccines have side effects that do damage people.Clayton Moore is saying that vaccine contents, not the vaccine concepts, are damaging people.
!
I will point out the stupidity in the quoted part of the web site and thus the stupidity in quoting it.http://www.nvic.org/doctors-corner/Aluminum-and-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx
In 1996, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a position paper on Aluminum Toxicity in Infants and Children which stated in the first paragraph, “Aluminum is now being implicated as interfering with a variety of cellular and metabolic processes in the nervous system and in other tissues.[3]
A review of the medical literature on aluminum reveals a surprising lack of scientific evidence that injected aluminum is safe. ...
Aluminium compounds are used as immunologic adjuvants to increase the effectiveness of many vaccines.[81] In some cases these compounds have been associated with redness, itching, and low-grade fever,[81] but its use in vaccines has not been associated with serious adverse events.[82] In some cases aluminum-containing vaccines are associated with macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF), localized microscopic lesions containing aluminium salts that persist up to 8 years. However, recent case-controlled studies have found no specific clinical symptoms in individuals with biopsies showing MMF, and there is no evidence that aluminium-containing vaccines are a serious health risk or justify changes to immunization practice.[82] Over the first six months of it's life, an infant ingests more aluminium from dietary sources such as breast milk and infant formula than it does from vaccinations.[83][84]
You missed his claim doctors don't immunize their children and that the children of doctors and the rich have a lower rate of autism than the general population.
You seem to be confusing two different things. Vaccines are not new. Many of these have been in use for half a century. And with such a long history, when there are problems, the data is there. The only one that comes to mind is the Saben version of the polio vaccine. Something like 14 people a year contracted polio from the vaccine.
New drugs go through animal testing and then clinical trials. New drugs obviously don't have long track records and some problems only turn up when they are used by a large group of people. When potential problems do show up, it can take awhile to figure out what is really going on. Reye's Syndrome comes to mind.
You missed his claim doctors don't immunize their children and that the children of doctors and the rich have a lower rate of autism than the general population.

clayton it is not insane and has been proved to be safe and effective.
Once again your ignorance is on display.
care to explain the scientific evidence for ANY of your assertions???
care to provide any evidence that the rich and Doctors do not immunize their children???
Wrong. The vaccine concept is not NEW. Vaccines are constantly new and IMPROVED (=souped up). What you and the others don't GET is that injecting MULTIPLE ONE FREAKING SIZE FITS ALL VACCINES into infants and children is absolutely INSANE.
It's not a precisely measured drug. It's freaking multiple, sometimes up to 8, concoctions that disperse to who knows where in a tiny body.
I've been pondering. In this thread Clayton has either linked to crackpot sites or to serious sites that contradict his claims. By the law of averages he should link to a serious site that supports his claim now and again. I can only conclude that there are no serious scientific sites that support any of his views on vaccination. Would I be correct in this assumption?
Wait till the public finds that out.![]()