• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

VA Tech School Shooting, possible 32 dead, developing...

Originally Posted by Prison Planet
The difference? 40 years ago cops were not cowards, they knew their job was to protect the public and they didn't hide behind trees while wearing bullet proof body armor and toting sub-machine guns, cowering in fear at the prospect of facing up to a punk with a pea-shooter.
Click to expand...
Originally Posted by Prison Planet
The case of the UT Tower shooting when compared to the Virginia massacre illustrates perfectly how American men have been turned into weak yellow bellies who beg and plead for the equally spineless police to protect them in a crisis.
Click to expand...
:mad: I'm sorry but who in the blue **** does he think he is? A "pea shooter"? This is right up there with Dylan's "I'd laugh in the face of a guy with a box cutter" crap. Two people who are oh so brave on a keyboard and have never been in a life or death situation much less a fight outside of the playground.

They claim to have proof that "the gubbment did it" yet can't set anything in motion to bring them to justice.

They claim they are willing to face down terroist with boxcutters at 20-30,000 Ft. but can't walk up to a member of FDNY and ask "What really happened with WTC7?"

They call cops "cowards" when the deadliest weapon they've faced is Gravy's binder.

They call college students "yellow bellied" because one minute they were sitting at their desks getting an education and the next their classmates are dying, even though some held the door so a few could survive. (Well I guess Librescu doesn't count because he's Jewish.) , yet if they saw a dark blue, never mind black, helicopter they'd be yellow pantsed.

Damn.
 
Redtail said:
They call cops "cowards" when the deadliest weapon they've faced is Gravy's binder.
Click to expand...


To be fair I wouldn't want to be at the receiving end of Gravy and his binder if he got pissed... he's a big boy, and that's a heavy binder.

-Gumboot
 
gumboot said:
To be fair I wouldn't want to be at the receiving end of Gravy and his binder if he got pissed... he's a big boy, and that's a heavy binder.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

anyone who has walked thru Arkansas and around america has a really big binder.
 
Dr Adequate said:
No you can't.

Not unless you imagined this:
Click to expand...
shocked032.gif


Holy mother of...
 
It's a conspiracy on the part of NBC. They want to have more people watch their news rather than the gripping drama of CNN...
 
pomeroo said:
Your claim about a whitewash is a falsehood.
Click to expand...

Actually the 911 commission report was largely incomplete of vital information and or events that could shed greater light on the people involved. Watch 911 press for truth, no whitewash? then why did only 2 of the commission members get to see classified documents, and many boxes they never went through, yes the info they did put forth is historical and the recommendations seem logical, but their conclusions should not have been achieved based off of the info they presented in their findings book (911 commission report), but based off overwhelming evidence of terrorist activity and criminal sections of the cia, mi6, mossad, isi, etc who could have benefited from 911...alot of smoking guns, thats why the commission was a whitewash, a incomplete biased (repbs and democrates only) piece of junk they want us to believe is complete at best!
 
israelside said:
they theorise, which means they are looking for truth/proof, or atleast the correct ones are! :)
Click to expand...

No, they look for a "smoking gun" to prove that "The Government" is lying, anything that disagrees they write off as disinfomation, planted evidence or lies. That's not looking for the truth.
 
israelside said:
Actually the 911 commission report was largely incomplete of vital information and or events that could shed greater light on the people involved. Watch 911 press for truth, no whitewash? then why did only 2 of the commission members get to see classified documents, and many boxes they never went through, yes the info they did put forth is historical and the recommendations seem logical, but their conclusions should not have been achieved based off of the info they presented in their findings book (911 commission report), but based off overwhelming evidence of terrorist activity and criminal sections of the cia, mi6, mossad, isi, etc who could have benefited from 911...alot of smoking guns, thats why the commission was a whitewash, a incomplete biased (repbs and democrates only) piece of junk they want us to believe is complete at best!
Click to expand...

Smoking guns such as?
 
PhantomWolf said:
No, they look for a "smoking gun" to prove that "The Government" is lying, anything that disagrees they write off as disinfomation, planted evidence or lies. That's not looking for the truth.
Click to expand...

some do, but not all folks that doubt the official story of 911 believe like that. Real evidence points to possible ISI connections on 911, why is that such "conspiracy" cooky idea?
 
Redtail said:
Smoking guns such as?
Click to expand...


such as the ISI/CIA connection with the paymaster/mahmaad (isi former director), the Kroll company, Jarome Hauer involvement, wtc7, John O'Neil, Drugs scandal with the CIA possibly wanting afghanistan opium (or for others), the admin not wanting a formal investigation for so long, the idea that the entire story and bin laden came forth on 911 as recorded on cbs with of all people Jarome Hauer. shall i continue? RJ Abbas, John Kerry saying wtc 7 was a CD now, operation diamonback, tons of warning signs before 911 not accounted for, possible lack of response times of plane hijackings by fighter jets...alot more, but alot of these things have been discussed on various sites, alot havent though, very little evidence of the cause of these.
 
israelside said:
such as the ISI/CIA connection with the paymaster/mahmaad (isi former director), the Kroll company, Jarome Hauer involvement, wtc7, John O'Neil, Drugs scandal with the CIA possibly wanting afghanistan opium (or for others), the admin not wanting a formal investigation for so long, the idea that the entire story and bin laden came forth on 911 as recorded on cbs with of all people Jarome Hauer. shall i continue? RJ Abbas, John Kerry saying wtc 7 was a CD now, operation diamonback, tons of warning signs before 911 not accounted for, possible lack of response times of plane hijackings by fighter jets...alot more, but alot of these things have been discussed on various sites, alot havent though, very little evidence of the cause of these.
Click to expand...
Oh. My. God! Who did kill John O'Neill?!?!
 
israelside said:
such as the ISI/CIA connection with the paymaster/mahmaad (isi former director), the Kroll company, Jarome Hauer involvement, wtc7, John O'Neil, Drugs scandal with the CIA possibly wanting afghanistan opium (or for others), the admin not wanting a formal investigation for so long, the idea that the entire story and bin laden came forth on 911 as recorded on cbs with of all people Jarome Hauer. shall i continue? RJ Abbas, John Kerry saying wtc 7 was a CD now, operation diamonback, tons of warning signs before 911 not accounted for, possible lack of response times of plane hijackings by fighter jets...alot more, but alot of these things have been discussed on various sites, alot havent though, very little evidence of the cause of these.
Click to expand...

Maybe you could keep this out of this thread. There are other threads already open where you can post your comments. You have mentioned John Kerry, there is a thread specifically about this topic open, and it would be an idea to post your opinions there, so people could respond accordingly.

Equally so , there are other threads that are open addressing issues you feel are important, if you cannot find them, then simply start a thread , raise an issue you wish to debate and I am sure people will respond to which ever smoking gun you feel you have found. Simply throwing down blanket statements and claiming lots and lots of things are wrong will achieve nothing. State what you feel is specifically wrong, why and the produce your backing evidence, preferably in the appropriate thread.

Just a bit of advice really, after all you are after the truth are you not? You really, sincerely really do want to know what happened don’t you?

Welcome and I look forward to your smoking guns and seeing you present evidence to back what you have claimed.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom