That's a pretty big supposition to make on just a guess.
I haven't studied this instance thoroughly, so I freely admit it's a guess.
But it's still irrelevant to the question of using gold as an alternate medium of exchange, because paying a bill is not a "deposit," it's a debit on your account.
I'm perfectly aware of that, and that's not what I said. I said that the smart thing to do in such a case was to spend dollars as soon as you got them to buy gold then deposit said gold in the "gold bank". If the value of the gold is allowed to float, as I suspect it may be, then you draw against the
value of that gold (denominated in dollars at the time of the drawing, not the deposit).
So the payer effectively relinquishes unto the payee any future value that the gold might acquire after the time of payment.
No, because he's not actually spending the gold. It's still in the bank. He's drawing against the VALUE of the gold in scrip (dollars).
It almost HAS to work that way. No one is going to plonk down an appreciating asset like gold in a bank if by doing so they "peg" the value of that gold to it's value at the time of deposit. Not only do they lose the appreciation in value, but it makes bookkeeping a nightmare, as each gold bar carried a seperate dollar value based on when deposited.
So the bank's ledgers track the physical amount of gold in the account. If you deposit 4 bars, your account reads as 4 bars. A separate line item in the account ledger lists the current value of the 4 bars, which represents the amount of dollars you have to spend.
It's not like the state is going to keep a floating ledger on all tax payments, increasing or decreasing each taxpayer's tax burden according to the market value of whatever gold they've already given as a tax payment.
You're right, it won't. The tax dept, like any other debt is not paid in actual gold, but in dollars based on the
value of the gold, as earlier indicated.
So the question still stands, why would somebody use gold to pay for anything when its value is on the increase? It just makes more sense to hold onto that more valuable resource and pay your bill using plain old dollars.
If I'm right, it's because they're using a floating valuation of the gold, as I indicated, sidestepping that issue.
Ultimately, the whole thing makes no sense as long as we are still under a fiat system, however you explain it.