Even if USA was founded on Christian beliefs why should it matter. I might be a naive european but is it really going to chance how people think now? Just because something was the law a few hundred years ago doesn't mean it should be now. USA was built on a very racist and sexist foundation, but I doubt many wants to legalise slaves and forbid woman to vote again just because it once was the law?
It matters a great deal b/c -- in the context of the previous posts on this issue just above -- if the proponents of this view are correct that USA was founded on Xian princples and the notion of a secular state is a mere myth, is in fact "historical revisionism" as they claim, then the implications are profound.
Keep in mind that laws had to be changed at the highest level to end slavery and to give women the vote.
If, on the other hand, these results had been accomplished not by act of law, but by those in power rewriting history to make it seem as though it had always been true, then once that error is exposed, we're back to square one and it would require new laws to get us back to where we are now.
This is exactly the goal of Dominionists like DJK.
Read their stuff, listen to their radio shows... it takes your breath away.
They adamantly affirm, as DOC does, that separation of church and state is purely mythological, that it does not exist, is not Constitutional, and is a fiction deliberately perpetrated by the secular humanist liberals.
They tell their followers that the true history of the Christian foundation of our laws has been rewritten, the textbooks are lies, on and on.
I even read an article on CrossWalk.com last week which proclaimed, with utter sincerity, that the Bible "is responsible for Western Civilization".
And keep in mind that we now have a President who has packed his administration, and the Dept. of Justice in particular, with young zealous evangelicals, such as those graduated from Pat Robertson's diploma-mill law school.
He has also adopted the position that the legal opinions of his office of legal counsel hold the full weight of law. So if Congress passes a law he dislikes, or the courts make rulings he disagrees with, he has his lawyers write opinions proclaiming that the laws or decisions in question have illegally usurped his constitutional powers and therefore they do not apply to him or his administration and he directs the members of his administration to ignore them.
If these people work their way into positions of power and influence, they can do a lot of damage.