• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Understanding the Liberal Mindset

Billionaires are not a Gender, Race or sexual orientation.
They are the results of a failed socioeconomic policy that is dangerous for the stability of the economy, society and political order.
And they can be rehabilitated and reintegrated into Society once they no longer pose and outsized danger because of their unchecked power.

Everyone who cares about their country should have beef with billionaires.
Eat the rich, that’ll fix it. Clearly the rich are evil bad people in need of struggle sessions and re-education. You can tell they’re all bad people, because they belong to a category that has a label!
 
Billionaires are not a Gender, Race or sexual orientation.
They are the results of a failed socioeconomic policy that is dangerous for the stability of the economy, society and political order.
And they can be rehabilitated and reintegrated into Society once they no longer pose and outsized danger because of their unchecked power.

Everyone who cares about their country should have beef with billionaires.
That just seems so contrary to reality. Societies with lots of billionaires are much more prosperous than those with few if any. Economic migrants want to go to countries with billionaires. Maoist China, with no millionaires/billionaires, was poor, hungry, and miserable. Contemporary China, with hundreds of billionaires, is just the opposite (even if still authoritarian).
 
Eat the rich, that’ll fix it. Clearly the rich are evil bad people in need of struggle sessions and re-education. You can tell they’re all bad people, because they belong to a category that has a label!
:dl:
Libtards!! Dumocrats! Antifa! The Radical Left! Immigrants!

No, they are not evil because they have a label. They are evil because they are billionaires in system whose sole purpose is to create billionaires.
If they weren't billionaires, they would just be plain, ordinary weirdoes sharing their nutty ideas with the lunatic fringe on the internet or standing on street corners with Bible quotations.
The Antichrist, i.e. Greta Thunberg:
Greta Thunberg works for the Antichrist, according to tech billionaire (YouTube short)


As for "Eat the rich":


Meanwhile, in NYC: New Yorker IN TOTAL SHOCK As Zohran Fixes Everything In Record Time (Secular Talk on YouTube, Aug 12, 2026 – 6 min.)

("Everything" is no doubt hyperbole, but still ...)
 
Last edited:
The Jason Arday debacle is a prime example of the Liberal-Progressive mindset in action.

The wokesters in academia uncritically believed this fantasist's outrageous claims (30 marathons in 35 days, appearing on a TV show that aired 20 years before he was born, among a host of other lies and fabrications). They ignored repeated, insistent, evidenced warnings about his credibility and about his plagiarism, and the ease with which he was granted his degree in Critical Race Theory, one of the most Mickey Mouse degrees going. They ignored those warnings because they have become blinded by their own vision - they did not want anything to get in the way of their drive for DEI - Arday was to be their poster child. Well now, it has all come crashing down - the Emperor is indeed naked after all!

Even more serious is that fact that Arday himself set the Police on a journalist who was asking questions about his qualifications, and instead of telling him to wind his head in (as they should have) the Police actually took him seriously. They instructed the journalist not to contact him again... and this wasn't some blogger or podcaster they were talking to, this was Jack Grove, a reporter and science/research policy journalist for Times Higher Education. Asking questions of dubious academics is his ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ job!!

Of course, Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley and has now admitted they were wrong. He said officers "dropped the ball" and admitted the complaint should have been "screened out earlier on as not requiring investigation". But this is what I have been talking about in the "Behaviour of UK Police" thread. This mess has been made, and Rowley's comments are a clean up job. They didn't learn anything from the Alison Pearson debacle, or the cockup with Graham Linehan, or Harry Miller, or Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine. It seems they still haven't learned to check first before taking action.

I would hope that this would be a fatal blow to DEI, that this disaster might trigger a period of self-reflection by academia that would eventually see a return to degrees and honors awarded purely on merit... but I'm afraid this wont happen. The mind-virus is too well established in the academic hierarchy - they will see this as a minor setback, and will plough on until the next debacle.

Cambridge is now a laughing stock having committed one of he greatest academic blunders in its history, but I'll bet there are other Jason Ardays out there in places like Oxford, LSE, et al.

 
Egads, the hypocrisy of some of these people.

Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy told the programme "the idea that an academic would be dragged through this amount of media scrutiny is unheard of".

Just gonna ignore the concerted harassment, threats, and intimidation that other academics have been subjected to and say it's "unheard of". Apparently they haven't heard of Dr. Stock?
 
Just gonna ignore the concerted harassment, threats, and intimidation that other academics have been subjected to and say it's "unheard of". Apparently they haven't heard of Dr. Stock?
Speaking of Kathleen Stock (if that's who you mean), she has a video out called "The Scandal of Jason Arday." I haven't watched it yet, myself.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom