UFO'S: A possible explanation

[Yeah_Right]

would you be surprised if I told you he had already shown his evidence (which was practically non existent) and seen it soundly debunked earlier in the thread ?

Well actually he just had rehashed non-existent evidence you can watch on any UFO documentary.

 

[Marduk]

I think yoiu have mistaken me for KoTA

yup sorry, my mistake, if what youve got is better than what KOTA had I'd love to see it.

 

[Yeah_Right]

yup sorry, my mistake, if what youve got is better than what KOTA had I'd love to see it.

Since I am a skeptic of UFOs I don't have any evidence, I am waiting for KoTA to present better evidence though.

 

[leafman91]

I think yoiu have mistaken me for KoTA

Ah, that message may have been a bit ambiguous. It was directed at Kota.
Srry

 

[Marduk]

Since I am a skeptic of UFOs I don't have any evidence, I am waiting for KoTA to present better evidence though.

<<< hopes youre not holding your breath

 

[King of the Americas]

<<< hopes youre not holding your breath

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sciencea...-anniversary-UFOs-photographed-by-Apollo.html



One of these is a mere shadow of a hill sticking out from behind another, but what are the others?

A blotch on the lens?

 

[Yeah_Right]

<<< hopes youre not holding your breath

Based on that link KoTA put up, nope definitely not.

 

[King of the Americas]

Based on that link KoTA put up, nope definitely not.

Hey that isn't 'my' link. Someone passed it along to me, from here.

The last image featuring the blue dots is especially interesting.

 

[Yeah_Right]

Hey that isn't 'my' link. Someone passed it along to me, from here.

The last image featuring the blue dots is especially interesting.

Never said it was your link, said it was "a" link. And, no.

 

[King of the Americas]

Never said it was your link, said it was "a" link. And, no.

So what ARE those blue dots?

 

[Yeah_Right]

So what ARE those blue dots?

Who knows? But looking at them I don't think they make your case. Now if the astronaut was looking at them, going OMG, aliens are looking at us, there might be something to the photograph.

 

[Marduk]

Hey that isn't 'my' link. Someone passed it along to me, from here.

mwahhahaha

 

[King of the Americas]

Who knows? But looking at them I don't think they make your case. Now if the astronaut was looking at them, going OMG, aliens are looking at us, there might be something to the photograph.

I didn't post them to 'make' MY case.

I just found them interesting...

 

[Yeah_Right]

I didn't post them to 'make' MY case.

I just found them interesting...

Yeah I guess they're mildly interesting, not evidence though, sorry.

 

[Vortigern99]

So what ARE those blue dots?

One possibility is ice on the window, the camera lens, or both.

 

[King of the Americas]

One possibility is ice on the window, the camera lens, or both.

Wouldn't water appear as a prism, featuring more than one color, given their distance from one another?

 

[Vortigern99]

What distance would that be? If there is ice on the camera lens, then it would be precisely 0.0 mm from the lens. If it's on the window in front of the camera, maybe we're talking about a few centimeters. Either way I'm not sure why it's relevant. By what principal does "water appear as a prism, featuring more than one color" at a given distance?

 

[King of the Americas]

What distance would that be? If there is ice on the camera lens, then it would be precisely 0.0 mm from the lens. If it's on the window in front of the camera, maybe we're talking about a few centimeters. Either way I'm not sure why it's relevant. By what principal does "water appear as a prism, featuring more than one color" at a given distance?

It doesn't.

You see the whole prism, usually.

 

[leafman91]

Wouldn't water appear as a prism, featuring more than one color, given their distance from one another?

Yes, but ice wouldn't.

 

[leafman91]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sciencea...-anniversary-UFOs-photographed-by-Apollo.html



One of these is a mere shadow of a hill sticking out from behind another, but what are the others?

A blotch on the lens?

Dunno. I couldn't say it definitely wasn't ET, but I couldn't say it definitely was ET either. Good mystery, no idea.