No... MY point was that Laroo isn't always a pineapple, so it would be IMPOSSIBLE to 'identify' him/it. Laroo isn't just a pineapple, you can't put him in a box, he could disappear in a pile of mushrooms, and try as you might, you'd never find him.
In which case, your point is completely irrelevant. It doesn't matter what the pineapple actually is, the fact they have named it as 'Laroo' means they have identified it. Mistakenely identified it, but identified it all the same. I have already posted this explanation twice.
Once deified that entity becomes boundless, restricted only by our imaginations. The term is "omni"...
Assuming you mean 'defined', instead of 'deified', then you have completely lost me here. I cannot see how that statement even makes sense. We define the things we see around us. We define tall brown things with heaps of green things growing off them as 'trees'. This doesn't make a tree anything else but what we have stuck the name to. You may call a Coca-Cola bottle a tree. You will be wrong. You will have identified the Coca-Cola bottle, but you will still be wrong.
Try a thought experiment out. One day, a tribe is stumbled upon, somewhere like west Papa New Guinea, nice secluded place. They have had no previous contact from the outside world (rather common), except for a whole pile of bestselling books that had fallen out off an aeroplane 20 years ago (rather uncommon) The books were torn to shreds during the fall by sheer friction (rather likely) and have been since scattered over the tribe's hunting grounds. They have been hunting down pieces of the books for years. Each time they find a piece, a sentence here, a paragraph there, they begin to learn. But because all the paragraphs are out of context, they have learnt the wrong meanings. For example, they would think the term 'rifle' to be describing a blade of grass, and the term 'jukebox' to mean a river. Have they discovered a language, a dialect, or nothing at all? If they were to call a river a jukebox, would they be right?
Would you say they have identified the river?
What I'm thusly arguing is that THIS is our mistake. NOTHING is limitless, except for the still expanding (at an increasingly faster rate) Universe/"God", but I think what we've all seen and tried to tell story of is "god(s)". They aren't "omni" anything, they're just a little better outfitted, technologically speaking. Well, who knows, maybe they're something else entirely...when you start talking specifics I readily admit, "I don't know."
When you say nothing is limitless, you mean...?
Try and make a granite stone stay in the air without being suspended by anything, or held by anything. I would call that a limit, wouldn't you?
So you are saying that they aren't omni anything, but that actually you really don't know. It's a wise statement, but it doesn't endear me any further to your opinion.
