Lucianarchy
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2001
- Messages
- 2,105
UFO video - Mexico11
- Thread starter Lucianarchy
- Start date
JPK
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2004
- Messages
- 1,870
Lucianarchy said:
Of course then there is this article...
http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic07-24-04.html
JPK
Lucianarchy
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2001
- Messages
- 2,105
Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
Which is a pretty flimsy hypothesis,to say the least. The objects are clearly moving, and the hypothesis doesn't account for all the uFO's on the video! ... aaprt from the supposition needed to hold much of the hypothesis together.
JPK said:
Which is a pretty flimsy hypothesis,to say the least. The objects are clearly moving, and the hypothesis doesn't account for all the uFO's on the video! ... aaprt from the supposition needed to hold much of the hypothesis together.
Z
Variable Constant
Invisible lights.
...well, scientifically speaking, I guess that's not an oxymoron, but still...
Well, folks, there you have it - the aliens are on to us, and now they've developed their own stealth technology. Except they forgot about the infra-red spectrum, apparently.
...well, scientifically speaking, I guess that's not an oxymoron, but still...
Well, folks, there you have it - the aliens are on to us, and now they've developed their own stealth technology. Except they forgot about the infra-red spectrum, apparently.
Rob Lister
Unregistered
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Messages
- 8,504
zaayrdragon said:Invisible lights.
...well, scientifically speaking, I guess that's not an oxymoron, but still...
Well, folks, there you have it - the aliens are on to us, and now they've developed their own stealth technology. Except they forgot about the infra-red spectrum, apparently.
I can see their head engineer slapping a tentacle to his brain case now. Doing a Homer Simpson inpression, no doubt --- infra-red? Doh!
Rob Lister
Unregistered
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Messages
- 8,504
Re: Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
Moving in relation to what, exactly?
Lucianarchy said:
Moving in relation to what, exactly?
Re: Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
How do you know they are moving?
Which UFOs are not accounted for? (You just shot yourself in the foot here, because if some of the lights are covered by the hypothesis, why not all? Some lights are explainable, but some are not?)
Incidentally, I'm not buying this "The crew never saw the lights". Why is the crosshair following the lights, then?
Lucianarchy said:
How do you know they are moving?
Which UFOs are not accounted for? (You just shot yourself in the foot here, because if some of the lights are covered by the hypothesis, why not all? Some lights are explainable, but some are not?)
Incidentally, I'm not buying this "The crew never saw the lights". Why is the crosshair following the lights, then?
Rob Lister
Unregistered
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Messages
- 8,504
Re: Re: Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
Beat ya'
CFLarsen said:
Beat ya'
Re: Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
Well, now, I'm one that's going to have a good night sleep tonight, beeing sure that the aliens has never been on earth.
Have you noticed that when you drive, houses on either side of the car, seem to be moving, in respect to your moving position?Lucianarchy said:
Well, now, I'm one that's going to have a good night sleep tonight, beeing sure that the aliens has never been on earth.
Lucianarchy
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2001
- Messages
- 2,105
Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
it's even worse to see skeptics and scientists engaging in unwarranted speculation
JPK said:
it's even worse to see skeptics and scientists engaging in unwarranted speculation
Lucianarchy
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2001
- Messages
- 2,105
Re: Re: Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
That's clearly not what's happening on the video. Please, let's at least keep it rational and forget that ridiculous 'gas flares' speculation too. These are UFO. They have yet to be identified. And from their height, the objects are clearly flying.Anders said:
Z
Variable Constant
Quoted from Jaime Maussan:
Sorry, that line just deserved a notice. Serve the armed forces for a decade... BELIEVE ME, perpetuating fraud is business as usual.
Sorry, that line just deserved a notice. Serve the armed forces for a decade... BELIEVE ME, perpetuating fraud is business as usual.
JPK
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2004
- Messages
- 1,870
Re: Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
Hmmm...
was that statement an amazing example of your psi powers or is it a direct quote from the article in Skeptical Inquirer volume 28, No.4 July /August 2004 page .
The remarks were made by a retired U.S. Air force major, astronomer, and technical consultant for CSICOP, Mr. James McGaha. The whole quote should read :
"There is no evidence that the objects in the video are flying saucers from another world", says McGaha. "The ridiculouos claims of believers are bad enough, but it's even worse to see skeptics and scientists engaging in unwarrented speculation. It is unfortunate that they have come out with suggestions that it was ball lightining, fireballs, meteors, or other re-entering debris. This is just nonsense. These atomospheric phenomena do not persist anywhere near as long as the images recorded on the video did."
JPK
Lucianarchy said:
Hmmm...
was that statement an amazing example of your psi powers or is it a direct quote from the article in Skeptical Inquirer volume 28, No.4 July /August 2004 page .
The remarks were made by a retired U.S. Air force major, astronomer, and technical consultant for CSICOP, Mr. James McGaha. The whole quote should read :
"There is no evidence that the objects in the video are flying saucers from another world", says McGaha. "The ridiculouos claims of believers are bad enough, but it's even worse to see skeptics and scientists engaging in unwarrented speculation. It is unfortunate that they have come out with suggestions that it was ball lightining, fireballs, meteors, or other re-entering debris. This is just nonsense. These atomospheric phenomena do not persist anywhere near as long as the images recorded on the video did."
JPK
JPK
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2004
- Messages
- 1,870
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
Are you sure "all" of the objects depicted in the video are "clearly flying"? How did you determine the altitude of "all" of these objects?
Are you sure that "all" of the objects are related to each other on the video? Some only appear on radar, others only on infrared.
Looks like there is plenty more to look into.
JPK
Lucianarchy said:
Are you sure "all" of the objects depicted in the video are "clearly flying"? How did you determine the altitude of "all" of these objects?
Are you sure that "all" of the objects are related to each other on the video? Some only appear on radar, others only on infrared.
Looks like there is plenty more to look into.
JPK
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: UFO video - Mexico11
They are not UFOs, they are USO, Uindentified Sitting Objects. Nothing in that video suggests that the lights are moving. Yes they are moving relative to the plane, but relative to the ground, they are sitting ducks.
How on earth can you know that! The article suggesting it is very detailed and quite logical. It's not a "fun" theory, but it works for me.Lucianarchy said:
They are not UFOs, they are USO, Uindentified Sitting Objects. Nothing in that video suggests that the lights are moving. Yes they are moving relative to the plane, but relative to the ground, they are sitting ducks.