Twoofers Only: The Mark Roberts Factual Error Thread

pomeroo said:
Number of factual errors made by Mark Roberts: 0

Number of eyewitnesses to Lyte Trip's Pentagon "flyover": 0

Number of serious journals to which Steven Jones has
submitted his work for peer-review: 0

Number of architects and engineers who believe that
the Towers had concrete cores: 0

Number of demolition experts who believe that
explosives were used in the Twin Towers on 9/11: 0

Number of real reporters who found a big story in
Norman Mineta's testimony: 0


Gee, you guys produced all this in only six years? Those evil perps must be trembling in their boots.
Click to expand...

I do sometimes find myself idly wondering just what would happen if real evidence did come to light which suggested 9-11 was an inside job. The incompetent 'truth' movement would be brushed aside by real investigators doing real investigations.

Kinda funny (well for 5:00am the morning after the night before, it is......:wink8: )
 
uk_dave said:
I do sometimes find myself idly wondering just what would happen if real evidence did come to light which suggested 9-11 was an inside job. The incompetent 'truth' movement would be brushed aside by real investigators doing real investigations.

Kinda funny (well for 5:00am the morning after the night before, it is......:wink8: )
Click to expand...



This is a great point! If a genuine anomaly surfaced, the media would be all over it. Imagine--Mineta calmly states that Cheney alluded to orders allowing a hijacked plane to crash into a government building and NOT A SINGLE REPORTER ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD SMELLS A STORY.

Morons--hopeless morons.
 
Last edited:
Jennie C. said:
No matter how much I love your otter, and make no mistake, I LOVE your otter, please no c-expletive cores!! That will haunt me all my days.
Click to expand...

Oh, yeah, that brings back memories... bad ones!

Actually, I remember that you were bound and determined to get through the entirety of that train wreck of a thread and was impressed by your tenacity. Similarly, I remember that you made your way steadfastly through the LC sticky threads as well. Kudos to you, then and now. :)
 
LashL said:
Oh, yeah, that brings back memories... bad ones!

Actually, I remember that you were bound and determined to get through the entirety of that train wreck of a thread and was impressed by your tenacity. Similarly, I remember that you made your way steadfastly through the LC sticky threads as well. Kudos to you, then and now. :)
Click to expand...

There ought to be a medal for that. Or maybe Belz could come up with an award...
 
beachnut said:
All the cuts Jones had in his paper were cut during clean up. So you are defending liars who make up lies about 9/11 and you have no ability to understand 9/11 and have no clue when people are telling you lies on 9/11. You are short on facts.
Sorry, all the diagonals were cut during clean up. Sad you are just making this up to support liars on 9/11. You are not trying to spread false information. Please bring some facts next time.
Click to expand...
there is no proof that the"cuts" that Jones showed in his paper were made during clean up, just opinions. He does not use them as proof only as more reasons for more scientific tests.
 
Belz... said:
Yeah, but they sure as hell can CRASH at those altitudes, can't they ?



Uh-oh. Never say things like that when you don't know who you're talking to.



Did... did you just contradict yourself, here ?



You might want to look up that word.
Click to expand...
You are mixing up my words with others who have responded to me.
 
lisabob2 said:
there is no proof that the"cuts" that Jones showed in his paper were made during clean up, just opinions. He does not use them as proof only as more reasons for more scientific tests.
Click to expand...

What is your definition of proof? Any rational person would conclude that an image of a similar cut shown to be made by a welder, but doesn't happen to show a welder actually making the cut, was also made by welders during the clean up because there a many pictures of welders making those same cuts on other columns.

Jones uses the pictures as part of his 'body of evidence'. If indeed it can be shown that the pictures aren't what he characterizes them to be, then perhaps you should be looking at other parts of his 'body of evidence' that may not be what he says they are.

Maybe, when all is said and done, this overwhelming evidence Jones says he has is just a bunch of crap. What a concept.
 
Last edited:
lisabob2 said:
there is no proof that the"cuts" that Jones showed in his paper were made during clean up, just opinions. He does not use them as proof only as more reasons for more scientific tests.
Click to expand...


Sure there is proof. The collapse was from the top down
Quod erat demonstrandum, they were cut during the cleanup
 
lisabob2 said:
there is no proof that the"cuts" that Jones showed in his paper were made during clean up, just opinions. He does not use them as proof only as more reasons for more scientific tests.
Click to expand...
He has said the cuts were made by thermite during 9/11, he is a liar. They are cuts made during clean up. Now you are a liar for not presenting real facts to make my claim false. Since Jones made up his thermite 4 years after 9/11, he is a liar about 9/11 conclusions he has made and tries to make. He keeps changing his story, and he has fooled you. Why are you so easy to fool?

You can not prove the cuts were not made during clean up. Why?
 
lisabob2 said:
there is no proof that the"cuts" that Jones showed in his paper were made during clean up, just opinions. He does not use them as proof only as more reasons for more scientific tests.
Click to expand...
Sure there's proof. The iron worker that made the cut. A real "truth" seeker/researcher would talk to him. Why is it that you or Jones has not. I know why Jones didn't but why not you?
 
lisabob2 said:
there is no proof that the"cuts" that Jones showed in his paper were made during clean up, just opinions.
Click to expand...

Well, yes, there is. A lot of them were cut that way. It stands to reason that those in the photographs are part of them. Or can you show evidence that someone on-site spotted 'cuts' that WEREN'T made by the clean-up crew ?

lisabob2 said:
You are mixing up my words with others who have responded to me.
Click to expand...

No, I haven't. You're not veyr good at this, are you ?
 
jhunter1163 said:
There ought to be a medal for that. Or maybe Belz could come up with an award...
Click to expand...

Shucks, folks, I'm speechless ... :blush:

(that said, as an aside to pomeroo, i would NEVER confuse a sea otter with a muskrat. in both california and alaska, which is where i've seen them, they are too cute)
 
Hmmm. 1,218 posts and not a single factual error yet? What has everyone been up to?
 
pomeroo said:
You're kidding, right? You're just kidding around, right?! RIGHT?!?!
Click to expand...

Hey, I'm just asking questions here...

:whistling

Seriously, the answer depends on whtehr or not you know where I live.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom