Twofers claim failed Turkish demolition proves WTC 7 was CD

[njslim]

The twofers are at it again - the failed implosion of the Turkish building where
it toppled over rolled has been claimed by the twofers as "proof" that WTC7
was brought down by CD

Turkish failed demolition

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozfzr3kkp_4

Twofers claim that since the Turkish building could not be brought down by
explosives how are we to believe that "a few fires" could cause WTC7 to
"collapse in own footprint in 7 seconds"

I bring you to the forum of the UK SUN - which has been invaded by
twofers spewing usual brand of idiocy....

http://www.thesun.co.uk/discussions...molition_Reinforces_WTC_7_Lie~46~-211425.page

 

[dtugg]

Twoofers are stupid.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

Honestly I'm just waiting for AE911 to pick this up... the whole topple over thing... sounds exactly like something they'd target in utterly true fashion...

 

[Astute Perspicuous]

What the heck is a twofer?

U we todd ed or what?

 

[UnrepentantSinner]

I love toofer logic.

A building demolition gone awry to the point where it made international news (as opposed to the many that just look cool) shows that WTC 7 couldn't, after burning for 8+ hours collapse on its own?

Hoo boy.

 

[eirik]

Amazing vid!! (hope no one got hurt)

Amazing but predictable twooferinterpretation.

 

[cyclonic]

What the heck is a twofer?

A twoofer with only 1 available orifice.

 

[jaydeehess]

Hmmm, where I live a two-four is a case of 24 beer. (often pronounced 'twofer' or tu-fur by those who don't need another one)

The rolling over without coming apart is a testament to Turkish engineering. That building was probably originally designed as earthquake resistant.

 

[Quad4_72]

I can't believe it held together. That was one seriously tough building.

 

[Good Lt]

The twofers are at it again - the failed implosion of the Turkish building where
it toppled over rolled has been claimed by the twofers as "proof" that WTC7
was brought down by CD

Turkish failed demolition

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozfzr3kkp_4

Twofers claim that since the Turkish building could not be brought down by
explosives how are we to believe that "a few fires" could cause WTC7 to
"collapse in own footprint in 7 seconds"

I bring you to the forum of the UK SUN - which has been invaded by
twofers spewing usual brand of idiocy....

http://www.thesun.co.uk/discussions/posts/list/Botched_Building_Demolition_Reinforces_WTC_7_Lie~46~-211425.page

Nobody would have seen this coming.

I love how Troofers think that the controlled demolitions of other buildings is somehow "direct evidence" for their imaginary demolition of the WTC.

That's like saying that if I got in a car accident in a Pinto and totaled it, that my new Ford Ranger is required to have the same damage in the same circumstance.

"Logic."

 

[fitzgibbon]

Flour factory apparently. Anything having to do with grain is overbuilt because of the potential for explosion with the dust and ground flour floating about. Grain silos are the same way

 

[Justin39640]

Flour factory apparently. Anything having to do with grain is overbuilt because of the potential for explosion with the dust and ground flour floating about. Grain silos are the same way

when i was in HS i worked at a vitamin factory
they didnt keep the exhaust and filtration system up to snuff and the manufacturing section had a lot of dust in the air
one overnight shift that ignited
blew the building apart there was almost nothing left about 30000 sq feet

 

[BasqueArch]

The rolling over without coming apart is a testament to Turkish engineering. That building was probably originally designed as earthquake resistant.

What we know from the visual evidence:

Some steel structures by fire or by earthquakes do not partially collapse
Some steel structures by fire or by earthquakes partially collapse.
Some steel structures by fire or by earthquakes completely collapse
No completely concrete structured buildings have collapsed due to fire.
Most CD’d structures, steel or concrete collapse completely
Some CD’d structures, steel or concrete do not collapse completely.
All steel structures struck by 130 ton airplanes collapse completely.

 

[psikeyhackr]

ROFLMAO!!!

That is funny as Hell!

But everybody knows Turkish steel is so much better than American steel.

psik

 

[A W Smith]

ROFLMAO!!!

That is funny as Hell!

But everybody knows Turkish steel is so much better than American steel.

psik

perhaps you can point out via screen capture the structural steel in that Turkish flour factory.

 

[jaydeehess]

ROFLMAO!!!

That is funny as Hell!

But everybody knows Turkish steel is so much better than American steel.

psik

When you see a demolition of a Turkish steel bldg be sure to let us know.

ETA: This could be another case of someone posting two separate thoughts in the same post and us reading them as conflated. Perhaps psky meant that the video was funny, but on another note and unrelated to this video, Turkish steel is better than American steel.

,,, but I doubt it.

 

[psikeyhackr]

perhaps you can point out via screen capture the structural steel in that Turkish flour factory.

.
Oh, you mean Turkish concrete is better than American steel.

psik

 

[T.A.M.]

I am waiting for the testosterone driven,

"Turkish Wood is better than American Wood!"

TAM

 

[TruthersLie]

I am waiting for him to ask the amount of concrete used in the building in turkey.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

.
Oh, you mean Turkish concrete is better than American steel.

psik

That's discrimination son!!! [/sarcasm]

Reinforced concrete is actually stronger and better suited against fire because of concrete's thermal properties (it doesn't start to sag like a wet noodle). But the weight it adds to the structure adds significantly to the construction costs...