Truthers Take On NIST

[Gravy]

Well you better tell Boloboffin what you know because he said I was killtown earlier

I'm sure you corrected him. The important thing is that I know who you are. Now, would you like to pay weekly or monthly?

 

[Wizard]

Funny, I just posted a quote in which you begged a forum to be forgiven for trolling. In that thread you stated that you regretted ever posting here and that you have doubts about the official story. All one month ago.

My case rests

 

[Wizard]

I'm sure you corrected him. The important thing is that I know who you are. Now, would you like to pay weekly or monthly?

Gravy you go ahead and have me unfairly banned as a sock puppet of pdoherty. I am sure its not the first time you have done it.

I read threads here. 28th kingdom was denounced as pdoh until someone spoke up for him. You are using it as an excuse to get rid of people. Go ahead and do it

 

[Wizard]

Fungi if I were pdoherty would I start posting threads he started? I reall did put your name in google and the results aren't pretty. Take my advice, change your username each time you find a new forum to troll

 

[The Doc]

Funny, I just posted a quote in which you begged a forum to be forgiven for trolling.

I'm sorry Begged?

That's what's called a written apology for making a mistake. You should learn how to do it.

I stopped posting there for a reason. They are all clueless. Go ahead and cry to them, I really don't care.

In that thread you stated that you regretted ever posting here

Typical CT behaviour. I just explained that by that quote I regretted posting here because of the way I formatted my first post. I do not regret physically posting here, but I regretted what the post contained.

and that you have doubts about the official story. All one month ago.

I have doubts about aspects of the official story. Nothing like you do. I believe that some stupid decisions were made, some people were incompetant but I certainly don't believe what you do.

My case rests

Well hopfully you can stay on topic from now on then.

 

[The Doc]

Fungi if I were pdoherty would I start posting threads he started?

Well you obviously did. Care to explain why?

I reall did put your name in google and the results aren't pretty.

Good for you.

Take my advice, change your username each time you find a new forum to troll

Hey just because you change your username from pdohrety to Wizard doesn't mean I should change mine buddy.

 

[OMGturt1es]

i'm reading the paper now, and i'm not impressed, in the least.

it's presented like a scientific paper submitted to a peer reviewed journal, but includes unsubstantiated claims, such as:

Although the airplane impacts caused large apertures on one side of the buildings, this alone would not allow for moving ventilation [of the fires].

so, don't buy into that "fire insurance" crap. even if a plane crashes into your house, there won't be enough ventiliation for the fires to move around.

Effectively, all of NIST's conclusions are derived from computer simulation. The reasons for this are not entirely clear.

that's right. why would they try to use a computer model to attempt to calculate all the crazy forces at play, when they could just build a model of the WTC out of chicken wire?

that's enough for now. i'll read more later, when i feel like punishing myself.

 

[Gravy]

Gravy you go ahead and have me unfairly banned as a sock puppet of pdoherty. I am sure its not the first time you have done it.

I am not a forum moderator or administrator, but out of curiosity, how many times have you been banned as a sock puppet of pdoherty?

 

[The Doc]

Good points Turt1es

I am keen for the response from the 'alternate perspective' crowd.

 

[28th Kingdom]

"that's right. why would they try to use a computer model to attempt to calculate all the crazy forces at play, when they could just build a model of the WTC out of chicken wire?"

Left-Bers - are you claiming this one as your own?

 

[Gravy]

Fungi if I were pdoherty would I start posting threads he started?

Yes, that's exactly what you'd do.

I reall did put your name in google and the results aren't pretty. Take my advice, change your username each time you find a new forum to troll

Mr. Doherty, I think it is you who does not understand where he's posting. Here we celebrate adjusting conclusions as new evidence comes to light. Do you know what that's called?

Learning.

 

[The Doc]

No he's not 28th... geez.

That's what someone from your side of the debate claims is scientific research.

 

[Wizard]

I am not a forum moderator or administrator, but out of curiosity, how many times have you been banned as a sock puppet of pdoherty?

None.

It is your duty to report me gravy. Go right ahead

 

[Gravy]

i'm reading the paper now, and i'm not impressed, in the least.

it's presented like a scientific paper submitted to a peer reviewed journal, but includes unsubstantiated claims, such as:

so, don't buy into that "fire insurance" crap. even if a plane crashes into your house, there won't be enough ventiliation for the fires to move around.

That was the first thing that caught my eye. The plane crashes caused apertures in several sides of the buildings. Somehow he missed that part of the NIST report.

 

[Architect]

Calm down lads, it's all get a bit ad-hom.

I'll look at their debunking NIST site and try and make technical comment when these strooooooooong painkillers ease off a bit.

 

[OMGturt1es]

"that's right. why would they try to use a computer model to attempt to calculate all the crazy forces at play, when they could just build a model of the WTC out of chicken wire?"

Left-Bers - are you claiming this one as your own?

if that was my work, i think i'd shoot myself. i don't mean to be too insulting to he who loves chicken wire, but really, what response does that "research" warrent other than: WTF?

 

[Architect]

Come on, calm down

 

[Gravy]

It is your duty to report me gravy. Go right ahead

You're wrong, Mr. Doherty, as you are wrong about most things. I have no duties here. If you stick around and choose to learn from your mistakes you will be improved by your time here. If you choose not to learn from your mistakes, you will live in Christopheraville. It's your choice.

 

[OMGturt1es]

That was the first thing that caught my eye. The plane crashes caused apertures in several sides of the buildings. Somehow he missed that part of the NIST report.

it reminds me of when i used to hear about fires not being able to penetrate the "air tight" elevator shafts. even if there were some truth to the elevator shafts being so air tight that fire could not burn within 'em, it seemed, in my mind, a bit obvious that CRASHING A PLANE INTO THEM might break the seal...

 

[28th Kingdom]

if that was my work, i think i'd shoot myself. i don't mean to be too insulting to he who loves chicken wire, but really, what response does that "research" warrent other than: WTF?

It warrants you...disproving his claims that NIST contradicted all of their "scientific," experiments...and created a computer simulation, just so they could get the answers they wanted.