• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Truthers Take On NIST

JamesB

Master Poster
Joined
May 27, 2006
Messages
2,152
The so-called Journal of 9/11 Studies, which as far as I know has split from the "Scholars" has come out with a paper criticizing NIST. I have never heard of the author, Eric Douglas. Apparently he is an architect, but I have no idea as to his credentials. They have an entire website dedicated to attacking NIST called nistreview.org, although they seem short on presenting their credentials to do so, and I am curious as to whether any of them (if even qualified) actually tried to submit comments during the years that NIST was asking for them.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200612/NIST-WTC-Investigation.pdf
 
Holy cow, what a piece of crap that paper is! No time to respond in detail now, but my first look tells me that it is well-qualified to be published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies.
 
I cant find any trace of an Architect by this name. I did find a computer programming architect by this name who works for Symantec in SF.
 
I really wasn't impressed with the paper. I'll have some specifics tomorrow, but it seems to me that the author is drawing more universal premises from single instances. "Because A is not mentioned in this chapter, A is never considered."

In all seriousness, if the author believes he has brought up valid concerns and criticisms of the NIST report he should publish them in a reputible, peer-reviewed scientific journal, or at least forward them on to NIST. NIST has been overwhelmingly receptive of public criticism and open about the draft process. They accept and incorporate critiques from both the laity and professional engineers.
 
Holy cow, what a piece of crap that paper is! No time to respond in detail now, but my first look tells me that it is well-qualified to be published in the Journal of 9/11 Studies.


It looks like a very good paper. I haven't read it all but its the most detail critique I have seen
 
It looks like a very good paper. I haven't read it all but its the most detail critique I have seen

Well that concludes it. If Wizard says it's detailed and good... it's quite obviously, in reality, blunt and crap.
 
Wow, at a glance I can spot out 3 things totally incorrect. I'll elaborate later
 
Wizard said:
I cant find any trace of an Architect by this name. I did find a computer programming architect by this name who works for Symantec in SF.

I found this guy in less than a minute.
 
Grow up troll. Keep working on your screw 911 mysteries film, i'm looking forward to the laughs

Ok. Vote time.

Who's the Troll. Wizard, or myself. I'll accept answers in any format.

No need to keep working, it's finished. And you have NOTHING to come back against the fact that the creators of this film have manipulated footage and you most certainly can't laugh at scientific law.

And I'll ask you again. How old are you?
 
Wow your better at googling than me. Would you like some sort of badge.

Well it looks like he really is an architect. That's another to add to the list

Now if you could only get some relevant professionals on that list you might get somewhere.
 
Ok. Vote time.

Who's the Troll. Wizard, or myself. I'll accept answers in any format.

No need to keep working, it's finished. And you have NOTHING to come back against the fact that the creators of this film have manipulated footage and you most certainly can't laugh at scientific law.

And I'll ask you again. How old are you?

They have manipulated nothing. I hope you are careful if you intend to defame them. For once, make an original fim supporting the official story instead of pasting crap over someone elses hard work

My age is not your concern.
 
Wow your better at googling than me. Would you like some sort of badge.

Jeeze, just pointing it out. You know what they say about first impressions...

PS.
If you're serious about the badge...
 
They have manipulated nothing. I hope you are careful if you intend to defame them.

You are in for a huge suprise. Seriously, do your own research into what they've presented.

Open your eyes.

For once, make an original fim supporting the official story instead of pasting crap over someone elses hard work

Who says I'm not?

My age is not your concern.

Yes it is. I want to know if you are a child or you're just acting like a child.
 

Back
Top Bottom