Truthers: How can you be sure YOU'RE not the "disinfo"?

[1337m4n]

I keep seeing Truthers accuse each other of being "disinfo". Supposedly the Bad Guys are planting "fake" conspiracy theories into the Truth Movement, with the intention of drawing attention away from the REAL truth.

For instance, the "mainstream" Truth Movement believes that no-planers are disinfo. They believe that the no-plane theories were planted within the TM in order to cause infighting, provide a "target" for debunkers, and distract everyone from the REAL smoking gun evidence (whatever that is).

Many believe that Judy "Space Beam" Woods is disinfo, whereas Judy's followers accuse the rest of the TM of being disinfo.

Citizen Litigation Team and Terral regularly accuse one another of being disinfo.

Here's Childish Empress accusing CIT of being disinfo: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3439383&postcount=8




Okay, so I just have one question for all you Truthers. And I'm not trying to be satirical or sarcastic here; this question is quite serious: How can you be sure YOU'RE not the "disinfo"?

In other words, maybe the particular theory YOU subscribe to was originally a government plant designed to divide and disorient the Truth Movement. Maybe you believe in thermite or demolitions or space beams or mini-nukes. Maybe you believe in flyovers or Tomahawk missiles or A-3 Skywarriors. Maybe you believe WTC7 was destroyed with malicious intent or maybe you believe it was destroyed for safety reasons. Whatever you believe, how do you know it's not disinfo?

If your pet theory was just a lie made up by the very Bad Guys you're trying to fight, with the intention of distracting you...would you know it?

 

[GStan]

Okay, so I just have one question for all you Truthers. And I'm not trying to be satirical or sarcastic here; this question is quite serious: How can you be sure YOU'RE not the "disinfo"?

In other words, maybe the particular theory YOU subscribe to was originally a government plant designed to divide and disorient the Truth Movement. Maybe you believe in thermite or demolitions or space beams or mini-nukes. Maybe you believe in flyovers or Tomahawk missiles or A-3 Skywarriors. Maybe you believe WTC7 was destroyed with malicious intent or maybe you believe it was destroyed for safety reasons. Whatever you believe, how do you know it's not disinfo?

If your pet theory was just a lie made up by the very Bad Guys you're trying to fight, with the intention of distracting you...would you know it?

[truth]

AHA! I AM DISINFO! And the existence of me as disinfo proves that there was a conspiracy that needed disinfoing! I still win! You still fail! Stupid debunker!

[/truth]

 

[twinstead]

I've always been amused at the whole disinfo thing. It appears to be some kind of 911 denier circuit breaker to rationalize the fact that their movement is populated by morons and crazy people. They defend their beliefs tooth and nail.

Sometimes I think the truth movement has more jingoists than an Alabama monster truck rally.

 

[332nd]

Some truther's head is gonna asplode over this one.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

For instance, the "mainstream" Truth Movement believes that no-planers are disinfo.

and on top of that many no-planers consider then rest of the TM disinfo for not concentrating on the blatant lack of planes and obvious tv fakery

 

[Nick Terry]

Some truther's head is gonna asplode over this one.

ROLL CALL!

If you have ever expressed a dissenting opinion from the 'official story', check in to assure us that your head has not, in fact, exploded.

Oh, and by the way, tell us why your dissent from the 'official story' is not, in fact, disinfo.

 

[gtc]

Someone is disinfo if the crazy they subscribe to is a different kind of crazy to your crazy.

All truther theories are crazy. Even most truthers realise that most theories are crazy. They just can't see that their theory is also crazy.

 

[Max Photon]

How can you be sure YOU'RE not the "disinfo"?

Did you just dis my info?

 

[gtc]

I still don't understand why they assume disinfo and not crazy.

Is it because they can't accept that anyone could be that crazy?

Is it because they want to feel important enough to get the government's attention?

 

[Max Photon]

How can you be sure YOU'RE not the "disinfo"?

1337m4n,

MAX = MILDEC ..................... I like it.

Your OP gets at the very concept of spontaneous, self-organizing pseudo- or counter-gangs - nonlinear resistance - that emerge under far-from-equilibrium conditions - a concept that I have been babblating about countless times. The opposing spirals of antagonistic pseudo-gangs form dissipative structures, and serve to provide real-time dynamic stabilization of the deception. MILDEC - in magnificently choosing the ambiguity-reducing deception of the jets - has very little work to do; everyone does the work for them.

Max

 

[Athyrio]

Paranoia will destroy ya.

 

[jhunter1163]

For some reason, this reminded of me of something I saw back in the day about whether Hell is exothermic or endothermic.

http://www.pinetree.net/humor/thermodynamics.html

I realize this is a Big Lebowski for a lot of you, but it's still funny to me.

 

[MIKILLINI]

1337m4n,

MAX = MILDEC ..................... I like it.

Your OP gets at the very concept of spontaneous, self-organizing pseudo- or counter-gangs - nonlinear resistance - that emerge under far-from-equilibrium conditions - a concept that I have been babblating about countless times. The opposing spirals of antagonistic pseudo-gangs form dissipative structures, and serve to provide real-time dynamic stabilization of the deception. MILDEC - in magnificently choosing the ambiguity-reducing deception of the jets - has very little work to do; everyone does the work for them.

Max

Or some people just believe thermite did it, although they have different views in the manner it was used. Does that make it a nonlinear psuedo-catalyst Max?

 

[Mr. Skinny]

1337m4n,

MAX = MILDEC ..................... I like it.

Your OP gets at the very concept of spontaneous, self-organizing pseudo- or counter-gangs - nonlinear resistance - that emerge under far-from-equilibrium conditions - a concept that I have been babblating about countless times. The opposing spirals of antagonistic pseudo-gangs form dissipative structures, and serve to provide real-time dynamic stabilization of the deception. MILDEC - in magnificently choosing the ambiguity-reducing deception of the jets - has very little work to do; everyone does the work for them.

Max

Max, your post gets at the very concept of spontaneous, self-aggrandixing pseudo-or COUNTER-DEC (or COUNTER-COUNTER-Spontaneous-High Dialectric Strength Resistance (linear)) - a concept I've been trying to get you accept countless times. The concentric gyroscopic global intertwining accepting gravity forming structures serve to provide a quantum static chaos of the COUNTER-DEC that a rotary pison bladed circumstance has been proven time and time again to be special.

 

[Mr. Skinny]

double post

 

[RedIbis]

double post

It might have been appropriate to leave it at this point.

I actually think the OP is an interesting and legitimate question and I might get around to answering it if I didn't have to cook dinner tonight.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

I still don't understand why they assume disinfo and not crazy.

Is it because they can't accept that anyone could be that crazy?

They think "we" are that crazy, so I doubt that's it. I'm of the opinion that most of them just can't accept that anyone in their movement could (or should) be that crazy.

I mean, look at them... They're entire movement is founded on the belief that they have outsmarted Them™, that they see the clues the NWO tried to hide and that lesser human beings are incapable of seeing for themselves.

You have to be smart to claim you've uncovered the truth behind 9/11. You have to have a vast and subtle insight under-appreciated by the rest of society. If a fellow truther is claiming no planes and TV fakery, or super-powerful, orbiting directed energy weapons, then they're not smart; they're insane and, therefore, not really a member of the Truth Movement™.

 

[Mr. Skinny]

It might have been appropriate to leave it at this point.

I actually think the OP is an interesting and legitimate question and I might get around to answering it if I didn't have to cook dinner tonight.

I agree that the OP is an interesting and legitimate question.

It's just that when I read that word salad that Max wrote, I lost control for a bit.

Care to explain to me what you think Max was trying to say? I couldn't make sense of it.

 

[coops]

It might have been appropriate to leave it at this point.

I actually think the OP is an interesting and legitimate question and I might get around to answering it if I didn't have to cook dinner tonight.

Hopefully cooking dinner won't permanently stop you from answering.

Im assuming you meant that if you had to cook dinner it would delay your response for a short time, not that it would permanently stop you from answering.



As an aside. Wouldn't it be nice if the CT movement decided to give at least an outline of what conspiracies are genuine and which ones are disinfo.

Once they have done that they could face the world as a united front, strong and confident in their knowledge that they have discarded all internal obstacles preventing them from overthrowing their corrupt freemason/joo/rockefeller controlled government.

 

[Mr. Skinny]

Hopefully cooking dinner won't permanently stop you from answering.

Im assuming you meant that if you had to cook dinner it would delay your response for a short time, not that it would permanently stop you from answering.



As an aside. Wouldn't it be nice if the CT movement decided to give at least an outline of what conspiracies are genuine and which ones are disinfo.

Once they have done that they could face the world as a united front, strong and confident in their knowledge that they have discarded all internal obstacles preventing them from overthrowing their corrupt freemason/joo/rockefeller controlled government.

(bolding mine)
Not gonna happen, IMHO.

There is no organized "CT movement" to decide this, just as there is no organized "skeptic movement".

In both cases, it's like trying to herd cats.