• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Truthers fake another WTC7 video

bill smith said:
I'm not going to worry about details like that at this stage. You can do the worrrying for me.

PS. The incendiaries were protected by the fireproofing from these relatively cool fires.
Click to expand...

Pssst.. incendiaries don't go boom.
 
Macgyver1968 said:


I find it very amusing the lengths troofs will go to prove their point...including manufacturing their own evidence....and it's not even a good fake...the building has been "mirrored" to make it appear like it's a different angle, and the sound quality of the "pops" doesn't match the sound quality of the rest of the video...too funny.

I thought the addition of the ufo was hilarious. (@ 15s mark) :)
Click to expand...

Question: What does it mean when you say the building has been mirrored? You mean we're watching a reflection of the WTC on another building?
 
Last edited:
Ron_Tomkins said:
Question: What does it mean when you say the building has been mirrored? You mean we're watching a reflection of the WTC on another building?
Click to expand...

The original video was "flipped" horizontally. The east penthouse is on the west side. I guess the faker wanted to make it look like it was shot from the other side of the building or something....even though the smoke still goes over the building, and all the same windows break.
 
NoahFence said:
I'm sad.

I've seen it like 3x now and I can't see the UFO.
Click to expand...

Watch the sky around the 16 second mark. It's kind of hard to see, as it almost the same color as the sky. You see it zip by.

ufo.jpg
 
Last edited:
Macgyver1968 said:
The original video was "flipped" horizontally. The east penthouse is on the west side. I guess the faker wanted to make it look like it was shot from the other side of the building or something....even though the smoke still goes over the building, and all the same windows break.
Click to expand...

Now I'm even more confused. So you're saying the sky would actually be to the left of the screen?

Also, I did notice a little thing moving on the 16 second mark but I can't identify what it is.
 
Ron_Tomkins said:
Now I'm even more confused. So you're saying the sky would actually be to the left of the screen?

Also, I did notice a little thing moving on the 16 second mark but I can't identify what it is.
Click to expand...

It's all UFO's and Elvis with you debunkers isn't it ?
 
Ron_Tomkins said:
Now I'm even more confused. So you're saying the sky would actually be to the left of the screen?

Also, I did notice a little thing moving on the 16 second mark but I can't identify what it is.
Click to expand...

In the original video, the east mechanical penthouse is on the left side of the frame. In this video the penthouse is on the right side. The faker flipped the video horizontally to make it look like it was shot from the other side of the building.

flip.jpg
 
Last edited:
I don't know why people bother replying to bs anymore. He is obviously a troll; there is no way anybody could believe all the things he says.
 
Macgyver1968 said:


I find it very amusing the lengths troofs will go to prove their point...including manufacturing their own evidence....and it's not even a good fake...the building has been "mirrored" to make it appear like it's a different angle, and the sound quality of the "pops" doesn't match the sound quality of the rest of the video...too funny.

I thought the addition of the ufo was hilarious. (@ 15s mark) :)
Click to expand...

A well known video to compare to.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A
 
Macgyver1968 said:
The original video was "flipped" horizontally. The east penthouse is on the west side. I guess the faker wanted to make it look like it was shot from the other side of the building or something....even though the smoke still goes over the building, and all the same windows break.
Click to expand...

That IS remarkable isn't it. Too bad the 'videographer' did not pan over to the west side of the building so we could see the lower NW corner intact..........of course if in this video the NW corner was not intact and in fact looked just like the badly damaged SW corner that would be bad for mr.smith's acceptance of this video.

Then again I also can't see any of the damage reported about the south side, nor the heavy smoke that enveloped the south side, nor does anything seem to actually fly out those windows where the flashes occur.

All so very curious IF this is actually video of the south side.

One also wonders where this videographer was standing. Looks like he was standing high up on the rubble of WTC 2 in order to not have WTC 5 or 6 in the frame.
 
Last edited:
Macgyver1968 said:
The original video was "flipped" horizontally. The east penthouse is on the west side. I guess the faker wanted to make it look like it was shot from the other side of the building or something....even though the smoke still goes over the building, and all the same windows break.
Click to expand...

Indeedly!

wtc7montage.jpg


:boggled:
 
jaydeehess said:
False dichotomy
Click to expand...

While I'm pretty sure Bill was being sarcastic throughout this thread (ie like it's absurd to label all "truthers" because of this because the video is so obviously fake and not meant to be taken seriously) This does raise an interesting question, I could see it now, they admit WTC 7 was demolition, make up some bs as to why it was done, and people here would be saying that an alternative theory is not correct. Really ask yourself that hypothetical question...that's how far some of you will go.
 
tmd2_1 said:
While I'm pretty sure Bill was being sarcastic throughout this thread (ie like it's absurd to label all "truthers" because of this because the video is so obviously fake and not meant to be taken seriously) This does raise an interesting question, I could see it now, they admit WTC 7 was demolition, make up some bs as to why it was done, and people here would be saying that an alternative theory is not correct. Really ask yourself that hypothetical question...that's how far some of you will go.
Click to expand...

You want to try that in English?
 
Im already seeing this pop up at another forum I visit as definite proof. I tried pointing out the ufo but they are calling this the smoking gun they been waiting for. :(

Any experts here that can analyze that video in more detail so I can show them?

Can you enhance the images to see if the contrast matches on the ufo to prove it was photoshoped? Or analyze the audio to see difference in freq?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom