• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Truther responses to Millette WTC Dust paper

Whether correct or not (and I doubt Fetzer can produce a mathematical or engineering calculation...no I KNOW he can't)... I would never quote Fetzer for anything. He's really been discredited and he seems to be a bit crazy. But he's well spoken and fools people.



Fetzer did good work for the JFK conspiracy.


I stopped referencing him when I saw him make a serious claim for no jets in the Twin Towers.
 
Fetzer did good work for the JFK conspiracy.
Exactly like his work on 911, fantasy, insanity, and stupid. Fetzer is woo and BS mixed at rates faster than free-fall.


I stopped referencing him when I saw him make a serious claim for no jets in the Twin Towers.
Like his JFK work, it is all words; Fetzer uses what he says as the truth, no evidence, only talk. And no planes is extra credit proof of how he is with JFK, 911, and more

Seeing your input on things I know are true, I'd bet with Harrit.
Harrit, is more nuts than Fetzer. Harrit has some ridiculous amount of thermite used on 911, and he found nothing but dust. Fake paper, fake claims, 911 truth experts are conspiracy nuts.

Truthers can't touch Millette's work - 12 years of failure continue for 911 truth.
 
Wasn't Fetzer the one who claimed the Z film was completely faked? I think it was other buffs who destroyed his claims before any skeptics could get at it.
 
Seeing your input on things I know are true, I'd bet with Harrit.
I have no doubt you would, that's what believers do. For me, I look at the data in the paper`and trust science.

You don't have to trust my word on this, just show the paper to any competent chemist.
 

Back
Top Bottom