Truther Mentality Flow Chart: Please Help

[Orphia Nay]

I love it!

 

[Robrob]

"Molten metal"

"Nano-thermite"

"Space lasers"

"VoiceSims"

"Energy bubbles"

 

[Sam.I.Am]

Just head on over to 911myths.com for most of what you need. The old index (http://www.911myths.com/indexold.html) has most of the stuff that some of the more insane truthers still believe in.

 

[David Swidler]

Got my first truther comment to the post - but it has to be moderated, and I can't decide whether to simply delete it (plenty of other places on the web to open up debate about this garbage) or publish it with a response. Here it is:

Your an idiot that accepts what your feed. Eat your **** and drink your Kool-aid, clown.

And:

^ fed. See the corrective nature? Not you zombie bots that won't do any real research.It'll be 3120AD and you'll still think 9/11 "truthers" are nuts. Long after your republic as dissolved and that key market in history itself was a ritual act depicting it.

If I do choose to respond, I'd love to know which of the many clear mental deficiencies to address first, and in what manner. So please weigh in on the merits of responding, and if so, how. My Dad was in the south tower, but I don't know much about debunking the CTs, just his experience.

 

[DGM]

Got my first truther comment to the post - but it has to be moderated, and I can't decide whether to simply delete it (plenty of other places on the web to open up debate about this garbage) or publish it with a response. Here it is:

ANd:


If I do choose to respond, I'd love to know which of the many clear mental deficiencies to address first, and in what manner. So please weigh in on the merits of responding, and if so, how. My Dad was in the south tower, but I don't know much about debunking the CTs, just his experience.

I think pointing and "laughing dog" works best.

Here's one if you need it,



This works too.

 

[dropzone]

I looked at it but because it wasn't presented as a collection of YouTube videos I could not accept it as valid.

 

[David Swidler]

Another one tried, this time with a YouTube clip. Decided to nip this in the bud, and posted the following comment:

Public Service Announcement: Please stop trying to submit comments debating the “facts” of the WTC collapse. My blog is for entertainment, not your delusions. The fact that you take satirical posts seriously says something about you, and it’s not flattering. Thank you.

The betting pool is open on the number of hours till the first cry of "Censorship!" et al.

 

[Orphia Nay]

Another one tried, this time with a YouTube clip. Decided to nip this in the bud, and posted the following comment:

Public Service Announcement: Please stop trying to submit comments debating the “facts” of the WTC collapse. My blog is for entertainment, not your delusions. The fact that you take satirical posts seriously says something about you, and it’s not flattering. Thank you.

The betting pool is open on the number of hours till the first cry of "Censorship!" et al.

Nice announcement.

It never ceases to amuse me when truthers respond to a commentary on their behaviour with behaviour that demonstrates exactly that commentary.

 

[Robrob]

Got my first truther comment to the post - but it has to be moderated, and I can't decide whether to simply delete it (plenty of other places on the web to open up debate about this garbage) or publish it with a response.

I'd delete the first one, profane and incoherent. The second one, not quite as ba as the first.

The betting pool is open on the number of hours till the first cry of "Censorship!" et al.

Strange isn't how many wingnuts there are in the world who cry about censorship and 1st Amendment Rights - in regards to posts on a PRIVATE PERSON'S WEBSITE!

It's like they think the Constitution applies to interactions between citizens and not just between the government and its citizens.

 

[David Swidler]

I'd delete the first one, profane and incoherent. The second one, not quite as ba as the first.

It's the same person; the second is merely an amendment to the first.

Strange isn't how many wingnuts there are in the world who cry about censorship and 1st Amendment Rights - in regards to posts on a PRIVATE PERSON'S WEBSITE!

It's like they think the Constitution applies to interactions between citizens and not just between the government and its citizens.

But it does! And it's all a big conspiracy to get the sheeple to think it doesn't! Eleventy!