Truther here is your chance to question the FDNY

[ULTIMA1]

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/index.html

I asked for real evidence not what was shown in a court, unless the FBI and NTSB crime scene reports were used as evidence.

 

[Brainache]

I asked for real evidence not what was shown in a court, unless the FBI and NTSB crime scene reports were used as evidence.

So you agree then that there were no firemen in the building when the call was made?

[response#31] What part of "search and rescue" don't you understand?[/...]

 

[Brainache]

I asked for real evidence not what was shown in a court, unless the FBI and NTSB crime scene reports were used as evidence.

Whatever evidence I provide, you will dismiss.

 

[ULTIMA1]

[response#31] What part of "search and rescue" don't you understand?[/...]

What does that have to do with posting real evidence ?

 

[ULTIMA1]

Whatever evidence I provide, you will dismiss.

NO only beleivers do that.

I will admit to real, verifiable evidence.

 

[SRW]

I guess you missed the video of them PULLING building 6 huh?

Might want to look up buidlings that have been PULLED before.

I am also waiting for someone to explain to me how they could pull firemen out of a buidling when 2 fire chiefs stated they were already out of the building earlier in the day.

So are you claiming puling building 6 also happened to building 7? would you please point out the cables they used I simply cannot see them. They are very clear on six...

No the fire chiefs obviously had a miscommunication, they pulled the men out of the recovery area; out of fear of a catastrophic failure at building 7, when Silverstien clearly wanted cables attached to the firemen so they could be pulled down. But those silly firemen went and blew up the building with silent explosive thermiate which leaves no trace and explodes five hours prior to the building falling. Oh and they worked "really fast".

Did I get your story correct?

 

[Brainache]

NO only beleivers do that.

I will admit to real, verifiable evidence.

So you think the courts used unverifiable evidence?

 

[ULTIMA1]

So you think the courts used unverifiable evidence?

Yes i do. The proof is that photos alone are not real good evidence unless they have the source information with them. So far i have not seen that with the 1 or 2 photos used as evidence.

 

[Gavron]

Have you contacted Moussaouis' legal team? Apparently their law degrees and experience are not as good as a supposed Air Force fire chiefs and NSA analysts.

I'm wondering if all lawyers should go to a cryptology school first, so they can undrstand what proper evidence is..

 

[Brainache]

Yes i do. The proof is that photos alone are not real good evidence unless they have the source information with them. So far i have not seen that with the 1 or 2 photos used as evidence.

http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/

From the link:

The following web pages link to all 1,202 exhibits admitted into evidence during the trial of U.S. v. Moussaoui, with the exception of seven that are classified or otherwise remain under seal. This is the first criminal case for which a federal court has provided access to all exhibits online. The exhibits were posted on July 31, 2006.

Many of these exhibits are extremely large files; to view them, a broadband Internet connection is strongly recommended.

A little bit more than one or two photos.

 

[johnny karate]

I am also waiting for someone to explain to me how they could pull firemen out of a buidling when 2 fire chiefs stated they were already out of the building earlier in the day.

Unless your stating the 2 fire chiefs lied?

You mean like you think they have done everyday since 9/11 about what happened at WTC7?

 

[johnny karate]

So you agree then that there were no firemen in the building when the call was made?

Perhaps you could attend the symposium and address this question to the firefighters themselves. And while you're there, ask them why they all have been lying about what happened at WTC7 for the last seven years.

 

[Caustic Logic]

I am also waiting for someone to explain to me how they could pull firemen out of a buidling when 2 fire chiefs stated they were already out of the building earlier in the day.

Unless your stating the 2 fire chiefs lied?

I think we're all still waiting for you to explain how you "know" that. Facts, evidence, something more specific than "late in the day" vs. "in the middle of the day" or something. because to me the context of Silverstein's comment is clearly referring to a pulling out of fire personnel still inside.

Please in this thread SHOW how you know they were already out, and the comment was about pulling the building. With cables?

 

[Bobert]

I guess you missed the video of them PULLING building 6 huh?

Might want to look up buidlings that have been PULLED before.

I am also waiting for someone to explain to me how they could pull firemen out of a buidling when 2 fire chiefs stated they were already out of the building earlier in the day.

Did you miss this part of he OP?

Have your questions answered by the members of the FDNY. On March 19th & 20th of 2009, the FDNY will be conducting a High-Rise Operation Symposium. Registration is 400 dollars before Jan 31st, 475 dollars after Jan 31st.

You work for the NSA as well as being a former Federal Police officer.
Will you be attending this conference?

 

[Bobert]

I am also waiting for someone to explain to me how they could pull firemen out of a buidling when 2 fire chiefs stated they were already out of the building earlier in the day.

Unless your stating the 2 fire chiefs lied?

You move from forum to forum demanding these answers and right in the OP it presents you with a GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY to have these questions answered.
Did you miss this?

Have your questions answered by the members of the FDNY. On March 19th & 20th of 2009, the FDNY will be conducting a High-Rise Operation Symposium. Registration is 400 dollars before Jan 31st, 475 dollars after Jan 31st.

Have you booked your flight, room, etc?

 

[Bobert]

Yes i do. The proof is that photos alone are not real good evidence unless they have the source information with them. So far i have not seen that with the 1 or 2 photos used as evidence.

 

[Bobert]

Perhaps you could attend the symposium and address this question to the firefighters themselves. And while you're there, ask them why they all have been lying about what happened at WTC7 for the last seven years.

EXACTLY!
Here is your GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY ULTIMA!
You will be famous as they all file out of the room under the pressure and embarrassment of you exposing them!
You will then be greeted with offers to do interviews probably from all over the world in addition to the US.
You can then probably quit your job at the NSA and tour and do speaking engagements!!
You can even stop the hours you spend online bickering over 9-11!
You will probably go down as the single greatest American hero!
You will have schools and malls named after you!!

 

[Zipster]

EXACTLY!
Here is your GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY ULTIMA!
You will be famous as they all file out of the room under the pressure and embarrassment of you exposing them!
You will then be greeted with offers to do interviews probably from all over the world in addition to the US.
You can then probably quit your job at the NSA and tour and do speaking engagements!!
You can even stop the hours you spend online bickering over 9-11!
You will probably go down as the single greatest American hero!
You will have schools and malls named after you!!

I apologize in advance but that bolded comment made me think of this right away:

 

[Bobert]

LOL no need to apologize....
NICE!

 

[1337m4n]

I will admit to real, verifiable evidence.

Then, by all means, explain for us an example of what you would consider to be "real, verifiable evidence".