• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Truther Candidates Completely Rejected By US Voters

the 9-11 commission got their info from the FBI, the CIA, and other intelligence services. info from these groups was also used to convict Mousoui and the folks convicted in Spain.

The FBI? Why didn't they stop it?

The CIA? Why didn't they stop it?

Mousoui was too retarded to even be a patsy or pretend pilot. Do you relate?

Attack the argument, not the arguer.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson


Again Spain? Please.

the point is...my friend...is that the evidence supporting the "OCT" has been vindicated by the convictions in CIVILIAN courts.

You have no friends that's why you are here everyday sad sack. Still you can't tell me how there is anything that validates what happened on 9/11.

thats, unless, you believe that the jurys were BRIBED or THREATENED into finding the way they did. any evidence.... if that is what you believe?

No that's your imagination. You need a lot of that to buy into this conspiracy theory huh?

or...maybe..the jurors were really Zionist stooges? or had mind control implants or forced to drink fluoridated Prozac water before they deliberated?

More imagination? Got anything else?


Whats that? You ready for the money shot? Here you go.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
attack the argument, not the arguer.

That is your argument I am attacking.

The CIA didn't do their job before 9/11 but now everything they say is Gospel according to the official version.

The FBI didn't do their job before 9/11 but now everything they say is Gospel according to the official version.

Spain? I don't know what the hell you're trying to claim about Spain.

Mousoui is retarded. Were there any other retarded hijackers?

I never claimed anything about lizards, Freemasons, bribery, etc. etc.

Do you have anything else?

Anything at all?
 
Mousoui is retarded. Were there any other retarded hijackers?

i dont recall a psychological determination by a licensed physician declaring Moussoui was mentally retarded.


telling me I "have no friends" and am a "sad sack"? thats really attacking the argument there my friend.

I will make my point, ONE final time. The evidence, supporting the OCT, was vindicated by the Mousoui conviction and the convictions in Spain. In all cases, a jury of civilians listened to the OCT evidence, and found it to be convincing beyond a reasonable doubt.

If you do not trust the judgemant of multiple civilian juries in the United States and abroad, why would you trust anyone who ever says the OCT is correct? Whats the point of a "new investigation" then?

I see no evidence that you would ever believe anyone or any 2nd, 3rd, or 4th investigation, trial, whatsoever, that comes to the conclusion that 9-11 was not an inside job.

Id like you to prove me wrong..my friend.
 
Last edited:
Paranoid schizophrenia and delusions go quite well with islamic extremism.

"the jews and the crusaders are trying to kill us!!! we just strike them first!!!"
 
see...i was gonna say something like that, but, after my very recent experience, ive decided to take more of a high road.

Homeland-just out of curiosity, since you think 9-11 was an inside job and all "supposed" al qaeda members are innocent..when Obama brings them to the USA from GITMO for trial, will you protest outside their prison demanding their immediate release?
 
Last edited:
i dont recall a psychological determination by a licensed physician declaring Moussoui was mentally retarded.


telling me I "have no friends" and am a "sad sack"? thats really attacking the argument there my friend.

I will make my point, ONE final time. The evidence, supporting the OCT, was vindicated by the Mousoui conviction and the convictions in Spain. In all cases, a jury of civilians listened to the OCT evidence, and found it to be convincing beyond a reasonable doubt.

If you do not trust the judgemant of multiple civilian juries in the United States and abroad, why would you trust anyone who ever says the OCT is correct? Whats the point of a "new investigation" then?

I see no evidence that you would ever believe anyone or any 2nd, 3rd, or 4th investigation, trial, whatsoever, that comes to the conclusion that 9-11 was not an inside job.

Id like you to prove me wrong..my friend.

Prove what? You can't even claim it's fact.

You point to the CIA as validation when you also claim according to the OCT that the CIA didn't do their job before 9/11.

You point to the FBI as validation when you also claim according to the OCT that the FBI didn't do their job before 9/11.

As far as civilian juries go I need not point to anything else other then the OJ jury. You don't believe that's beyond a reasonable doubt too do you?

Well maybe you do.

I see you not pushing anything here more then what you wanted to believe before you heard any so-called evidence.

Just like everyone else here pretending day in and day out at the same time proclaiming the truth movement is dead.

Why?
 
Last edited:
Prove what? You can't even claim it's fact.

You point to the CIA as validation when you also claim according to the OCT that the CIA didn't do their job before 9/11.

You point to the FBI as validation when you also claim according to the OCT that the FBI didn't do their job before 9/11.

As far as civilian juries go I need not point to anything else other then the OJ jury. You don't believe that's beyond a reasonable doubt too do you?

Well maybe you do.

I see you not pushing anything here more then what you wanted to believe before you heard any so-called evidence.

Just like everyone else here pretending day in and day out at the same time proclaiming the truth movement is dead.

Why?

yes. The CIA and the FBI and the NSA failed miserably. what does that have to do with the intelligence they gathered after 9-11? does this now mean ALL FBI criminal investigations are completaly useless? all CIA investigations are completaly baseless? come on now my friend.

so now you dont believe civilian juries at all? ever? or is it just when you disagree with the verdict.

comparing the Mousoui trial..to OJ..is classic.

the truth movement IS dead. there wil be 9-11 conspiracy theories and theorists for some time to come. just like with JFK, Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and Chupacabra.
 
Last edited:
see...i was gonna say something like that, but, after my very recent experience, ive decided to take more of a high road.

Homeland-just out of curiosity, since you think 9-11 was an inside job and all "supposed" al qaeda members are innocent..when Obama brings them to the USA from GITMO for trial, will you protest outside their prison demanding their immediate release?

Where did you get your ideas about what I think? The same place you got your ideas about the OCT?
 
yes. The CIA and the FBI and the NSA failed miserably.

Thank you.

what does that have to do with the intelligence they gathered after 9-11? does this now mean ALL FBI criminal investigations are completaly useless? all CIA investigations are completaly baseless? come on now my friend.

Not all...

Richard Pearl...

Steven Hatfield...

"WMD's a slam dunk"...

sigh...

Got anything else?

so now you dont believe civilian juries at all? ever? or is it just when you disagree with the verdict.

Do you believe them every time? based on the CIA and FBI?


comparing the Mousoui trial..to OJ..is classic.

Well that's true. It certainly didn't get as much attention as OJ.

the truth movement IS dead. there wil be 9-11 conspiracy theories and theorists for some time to come. just like with JFK, Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and Chupacabra.

So why are you here? Do you spend as much time on fighting JFK, Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and Chupacabra conspiracies?

Who the hell is Chupacabra?
 
"While I do not believe the U.S. government was complicit..."

Why didn't he say he knows?

Why don't you know?

You must have an accountable subject in mind, don't you? You seem very convinced somebody is directly involved and persistent enough to indicate some investigating on your behalf, but not enough to present evidence on who should be held accountable.

Unless, of course, you don't have someone in mind. In that case you may as well send a letter to the President elect for clarification on what he meant in his letter.
 
Last edited:
The topic of this thread was not the scientific measurement of anything. It was to demonstrate how political candidates who are Truthers fared in the elections.

If you want to talk about these supposed poll numbers that mysteriously have no bearing on reality, start a new thread.


Well if your ignorant demonstrations can be easily knocked down then I will knock them down. I like how you skipped over 90% of my response and tried to down me for mentioning a polling company. That shows what kind of intelligent fellow you are.

The context of this thread is to somehow prove that the number of people who don't completely buy into the Government story are exaggerated by the polls. The point is obviously to say that the polls are wrong so they are part of this thread whether you think so or not.

I know that would make the argument easier but, you know.:D
 
um....who cares how many people get a phone call during dinner time and say "sure, i have some questions about 9-11".

this doesnt mean they think 9-11 was an inside job.
 
but someones on the phone hun.. what do i do now??

um....who cares how many people get a phone call during dinner time and say "sure, i have some questions about 9-11".

this doesnt mean they think 9-11 was an inside job.

and if someones stupid enough to allow themselves to be interupted at dinner time then the poll results will be skewd to the opinions of those on the short end of the IQ scale.

IE, truthers

QED
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom