Truther Candidates Completely Rejected By US Voters

[JihadJane]

I couldn't care less if you find the use of word twoof and its variants childish. I didn't make it up but I do find it funny.

And yes, twoofers, Cynthia McKinney included, are terrorist apologists. It is pretty simple. They try to shift blame of those really responsible for the 9/11 attacks, Islamic terrorists, to some imaginary conspiracy. Therefore they apologize for the actions of terrorists. It may not be intentional, but every single twoofer in the history of da twoof is guilty of being a terrorist apologist. That is why they deserve all they ridicule they get. I usually don't make fun of morons, but twoofers are a special kind of moron.

ETA:

On reflection, apologists might not be the right word. I suppose that would imply that they acknowledge the terrorists really did but are justifying the why. I guess I use that term for a for lack of a better one. The spirit of what I said still stands. Twoofers try to take the blame from those who were really responsible. That makes them despicable and deserving of all the scorn and ridicule in the world. The fact that they are morons also is a bonus.

Wespect to you for thinking about what you say.

If someone murders my friend and I suspect that the person prosecuted for it is innocent or may have been duped or set up does that make me an apologist for murderers?

 

[MarkCorrigan]

Wespect to you for thinking about what you say.

If someone murders my friend and I suspect that the person prosecuted for it is innocent or may have been duped or set up does that make me an apologist for murderers?

If you have no evidence to base your assumption of innocence on, and the prosecution has lot of evidence, including a confession, then it makes you an apologist for A murderer. 9/11 truthers aren't apologists for all terrorists, just those involved in the attack.

 

[Horatius]

Wespect to you for thinking about what you say.

If someone murders my friend and I suspect that the person prosecuted for it is innocent or may have been duped or set up does that make me an apologist for murderers?

If you think he's innocent contrary to the vast majority of physical and documentary evidence, and despite his voluntary confession that he did it, then yes, it does.

 

[Myriad]

If someone murders my friend and I suspect that the person prosecuted for it is innocent or may have been duped or set up does that make me an apologist for murderers?

By that analogy, corporate finance workers in New York, NYPD officers, U.S. military officers and DoD employees are among your friends. And yet, you constantly scorn people like that and the work they do. I suspect your analogy is therefore dishonest.

Let's try it this way: If people whom you've consistently scorned and insulted are murdered, and friends of yours are prosecuted for it, and you claim your friends are innocent or may have been duped or set up despite ample evidence to the contrary, does that make you an apologist for murderers?

The answer is yes.

Sorry, person whose self-chosen name is "Jihad." That's the way it is. And it's very, very obvious.

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[WildCat]

Indeed. The implication of my post ("At least they had some candidates. Where were the debunker candidates?") is that the premise of this thread is ludicrous.

I disagree. You guys claim that anywhere from 20-80% of Americans think 9/11 was an inside job. If this were true it would be THE big issue of the campaign, instead the few truther candidates out there went down in flames.

Fact is, only a few percent of the population at most thinks 9/11 was an inside job. And many of those people are obviously mentally ill (Ace Baker, Judy Wood, Fetzer) or in it for the money (Rob Balsamo, CIT, the LC crew), or paranoid anti-semite lunatics (Alex Jones).

 

[johnny karate]

At least they had some candidates. Where were the debunker candidates?

Good point.

And since no one ran on the "Anti-Sasquatch" platform, I guess that's quite a victory for all those believers in Bigfoot.

Logic is fun!

 

[Thunder]

um...anyone who is not actively or passively a 9-11 truther..we can assume pretty much agrees with the "OCT".

it is not truthers vs. debunkers. it is truthers vs. non-truthers.

 

[johnny karate]

Why would my personal beliefs be your personal beliefs? That's your list not mine. I believe there needs to be a real investigation with real accountability.

The one thing I take way from this post is that you are most definitely not Barack Obama.

 

[Without Rights]

Cynthia McKinney?

It's hard to get votes if no one knows you are running and your missing from many of the states ballots.

Anyway, not everyone who is LIHOP is going to vote for McKinney just on that one issue. What else is she about? No one knows because no one talks about her. The green party barely gets mentioned.

And also, not everyone who is a "truther" knew that she was running or that she herself is a so-called truther.

Your example is far from an unskewed scientific method for measuring LIHOP and MIHOP's. The most scientific method available is to poll to random people like Zogby.

 

[Thunder]

Why would my personal beliefs be your personal beliefs? That's your list not mine. I believe there needs to be a real investigation with real accountability.

there was a real investigation. several of them. and the information developed from these investigations stood up in courts in the USA, Spain, and will stand up again in more cases.

but oh...i forgot...kangaroo courts....NWO judges. bla bla bla.

 

[johnny karate]

Cynthia McKinney?

It's hard to get votes if no one knows you are running and your missing from many of the states ballots.

Anyway, not everyone who is LIHOP is going to vote for McKinney just on that one issue. What else is she about? No one knows because no one talks about her. The green party barely gets mentioned.

And also, not everyone who is a "truther" knew that she was running or that she herself is a so-called truther.

Your example is far from an unskewed scientific method for measuring LIHOP and MIHOP's. The most scientific method available is to poll to random people like Zogby.

The topic of this thread was not the scientific measurement of anything. It was to demonstrate how political candidates who are Truthers fared in the elections.

If you want to talk about these supposed poll numbers that mysteriously have no bearing on reality, start a new thread.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

there was a real investigation. several of them. and the information developed from these investigations stood up in courts in the USA, Spain, and will stand up again in more cases.

but oh...i forgot...kangaroo courts....NWO judges. bla bla bla.

So why can't you still prove the official version valid?

Spain?

LOL

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

"While I do not believe the U.S. government was complicit..."

Why didn't he say he knows?

Why don't you know?

 

[Thunder]

So why can't you still prove the official version valid?

Spain?

LOL

um.....it is valid. what is there to prove? its already been proven.

The evidence supporting it was found to be legit in a court of law in the United States. A jury of regular Americans decided so.

You got something against Spain?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

um.....it is valid. what is there to prove? its already been proven.

The evidence supporting it was found to be legit in a court of law in the United States. A jury of regular Americans decided so.

What evidence proves NIST (Whose own insiders criticize the NIST investigative techniques or lack thereof), the 9/11 Commission (whose own members now claim they were obstructed), or anyone here at JREF spouting off their retarded mouth, validate the official version?

You got something against Spain?

No. They're just not America and they weren't attacked on 9/11. What the hell do they know? And what evidence did they have access to?

Parky how do you know the official version is valid other then Spain told you so?

Please

 

[JihadJane]

If you have no evidence to base your assumption of innocence on, and the prosecution has lot of evidence, including a confession, then it makes you an apologist for A murderer. 9/11 truthers aren't apologists for all terrorists, just those involved in the attack.

If you think he's innocent contrary to the vast majority of physical and documentary evidence, and despite his voluntary confession that he did it, then yes, it does.

No, it doesn't. With all the above it is still reasonable to be suspicious. Innocent people have been convicted of terrorist crimes before and criminals have been framed. US and other intelligence agencies have a history of collusion with and manipulation of Islamic Fundamentalists.

By that analogy, corporate finance workers in New York, NYPD officers, U.S. military officers and DoD employees are among your friends. And yet, you constantly scorn people like that and the work they do. I suspect your analogy is therefore dishonest.

Do you have evidence of me constantly scorning the work of any of these very general categories (where no criminal activity is innvolved) or are you just doing the "debunker" 'Remote Viewing' dance?

Let's try it this way: If people whom you've consistently scorned and insulted are murdered, and friends of yours are prosecuted for it, and you claim your friends are innocent or may have been duped or set up despite ample evidence to the contrary, does that make you an apologist for murderers?

The answer is yes.

Sorry, person whose self-chosen name is "Jihad." That's the way it is. And it's very, very obvious

Respectfully,
Myriad

The evidence upon which you base your assumptions is unimpressive. I'm a friend of terrorists becasue I've got "Jihad" in my screenname? Are you a friend of the number ten thousand?

I disagree. You guys claim that anywhere from 20-80% of Americans think 9/11 was an inside job. If this were true it would be THE big issue of the campaign, instead the few truther candidates out there went down in flames.

More assumptions based on lazy stereotypes. Where is your evidence that I hold these beliefs?

Fact is, only a few percent of the population at most thinks 9/11 was an inside job. And many of those people are obviously mentally ill (Ace Baker, Judy Wood, Fetzer) or in it for the money (Rob Balsamo, CIT, the LC crew), or paranoid anti-semite lunatics (Alex Jones).

Where would "debunkers” be without their favowite celebrwity twoofer mascots? Do you have evidence for your statistics and psychiatric diagnoses?

Good point.

And since no one ran on the "Anti-Sasquatch" platform, I guess that's quite a victory for all those believers in Bigfoot.

Logic is fun!

Where did I claim a victowy for twoofers?

 

[Thunder]

No. They're just not America and they weren't attacked on 9/11. What the hell do they know? And what evidence did they have access to?

Parky how do you know the official version is valid other then Spain told you so?

Please

lololol...thank you for the late afternoon laugh.

Spain wasnt attacked on 9-11, but some of the hijackers came from there so Spain charged them with the attacks. A jury in Spain found them guilty, based on the intelligence gathered by the FBI, CIA, and Spanish intelligence and police services.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/spain-jails-18-alqaeda-operatives/2005/09/27/1127586828047.html

I know you think America is run by the evil Mossad/NWO/Freemason lizard people..but do you think Spain is run by them too?

Honestly, my friend, where does it end???

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

lololol...thank you for the late afternoon laugh.

Spain wasnt attacked on 9-11, but some of the hijackers came from there so Spain charged them with the attacks. A jury in Spain found them guilty, based on the intelligence gathered by the FBI, CIA, and Spanish intelligence and police services.

I know you think America is run by the evil Mossad/NWO/Freemason lizard people..but do you think Spain is run by them too?

So what does that prove?

I'm talking about the 9/11 commission, the NIST report, and you're ranting about Spain, lizards, and freemasons.

Is that all you have?

 

[Thunder]

the 9-11 commission got their info from the FBI, the CIA, and other intelligence services. info from these groups was also used to convict Mousoui and the folks convicted in Spain.

the point is...my friend...is that the evidence supporting the "OCT" has been vindicated by the convictions in CIVILIAN courts.

thats, unless, you believe that the jurys were BRIBED or THREATENED into finding the way they did. any evidence.... if that is what you believe?

or...maybe..the jurors were really Zionist stooges? or had mind control implants or forced to drink fluoridated Prozac water before they deliberated?

 

[DGM]

No. They're just not America and they weren't attacked on 9/11. What the hell do they know? And what evidence did they have access to?

Parky how do you know the official version is valid other then Spain told you so?
Please

Because I don't live in a fantasy world where my "evidence" needs no basis in reality! Wake up! Nothing the "truthers" say is based on provable fact. This you can't deny