Truth hypothesis

[Oystein]

See post #97 where I exactly answered that. My responses were in bold, maybe I should have pointed that out. I'll try to bullet point my responses for your convenience in the future.

EDIT: Just re-read my own answer and your reply and my only thought was please don't let this guy steer this towards "anti-semitism". I am not against people of any religion, ever.

I read that - and still I wonder why you picked Israel and not one of the other 190 or so countries at random disposal? Surely there must have been a reason? I would think that you picked Israel because you figured its government (?) to be a more likely member of the global cabal than the Turkish, Pakistani or German.

You see, when someone proposes a theory about who killed 3000 human beings, and NAMES suspects (or groups) as possible perpetrators, I most definitely expect that they have reasons to NAME the suspects. Everything else would be very bad taste.

I would probably ask the same question if you had named Turkey, Pakistan, Germany or Botswana. You just didn't.

 

[Oystein]

Originally Posted by Oystein
Urr fill me in here, as I must have missed something. So far I was under the impression that the 9/11 Truth Movement was not very organized at all, certainly not complex, and breathtakingly unsuccessful.

Generally speaking, the more complex an organization gets, the less likely it will work well. I say this after 10 years experience as a senior IT consultant.

My bold

Should I generate an individual ticket for each question then, you seem to miss a lot...

Call for help to all others: Do you see something there that I have missed? Or is ImANiceGuy here the lone enlighted guy?

 

[JohnG]

Finally, I reserve the right to alter or change my hypothesis at any time in light of new facts.

What do you have against old facts?

 

[Telltale Tom]

touche...

Anyway, if you want to have a little more fun picking my hypothesis apart, let's just keep the question to one at a time, and I will be able to give more in depth, specific answers which will, hopefully, satisfy a few of you.

Previously, I was asked a laundry list of vague, categorizing questions to which I replied briefly and vaguely...

Hypothesis: A cabal of global elites orchestrated an attack which served their geo-political/financial interests.

Finally, I reserve the right to alter or change my hypothesis at any time in light of new facts.

Look guys I have to apologize for ImaNiceGuy, he is not the brightest spark in ae911truth, and as he says he can only deal with one question at a time, so please keep it nice and simple, and one question at a time please, and nothing technical.

And don't ask vague questions because he's of the type that thinks that vague questions deserve vague answers.

But because he's such a nice guy he will eventually tell us all about the global cabal, unless he gets distracted, and too busy. So please wait as he promises that we will have "fun". Just wait.

 

[ImANiceGuy]

Look guys I have to apologize for ImaNiceGuy, he is not the brightest spark in ae911truth, and as he says he can only deal with one question at a time, so please keep it nice and simple, and one question at a time please, and nothing technical.

And don't ask vague questions because he's of the type that thinks that vague questions deserve vague answers.

But because he's such a nice guy he will eventually tell us all about the global cabal, unless he gets distracted, and too busy. So please wait as he promises that we will have "fun". Just wait.

Classic duh-bunkerism here. If you tried reading through the thread for context I'm sure it would help your comprehension. But please attack me personally all you want...it helps my self-esteem.

One specific question at a time is easier then 15 vague questions in a single post, internet thread format.......duh

 

[Telltale Tom]

Oh yes... I have forgotten the question
...nice tactic