timhau
NWO Litter Technician
I think there is one immediate and very critical result that will come from the release of the tax returns:
no major law firm will represent him without cash up front.
I think that has already been the case.
I think there is one immediate and very critical result that will come from the release of the tax returns:
no major law firm will represent him without cash up front.
Someone on CNN said Biden should hand Trump a check for $750 at the debate and say he heard he needed a loan.
So the NYT has given us the "eye opening revelation" (based on documents it hasn't disclosed) that Trump is no different to other 1 percenters. He has taken advantage of the complex tax laws to reduce his tax liability to practically nothing.
I'm shocked I tells you, SHOCKED!![]()
It shows that he has broken tax laws.
You misunderstand. This is not in anyway a vindication of Trump.And there it is. The "everyone does it" excuse. I'm shocked I tells you, SHOCKED!![]()
From the ARTICLE:The documents it hasn't disclosed? You mean Trump's tax returns?
We do know he pays out for his hair, that was the cause of him assaulting and "not rape rape" raping his first wife.NBC says Trump used their hair stylist on the show in 3...2...1.
It shows that he has broken tax laws.
It's clear from the documents that Trump runs is businesses at a constant loss and siphons the profits to somewhere else.
Just like he's doing to the US.
No wonder the IRS takeover was more important than anything else to Trump after the inauguration.
I hope Biden will make a commitment to taking from Trump every tax dollar he owes.
The word “think” is the key. When I comment ex cathedra, I’ll let people know.
It narrowed after the conventions. Then it steadied for a few weeks. The margin has increased ever so slightly in the past week. (From 6.8 to 7.2 per 538.)
(I check 538 multiple times a day. A sign of fear and/or pathos, take your pick.)
Ivanka was paid as a consultant on projects that she was managing
Huge red flag, and very illegal, apparently. Also not something she can wriggle out of - as a member of the organisation, she is legally on the hook here.
Melania must be worried now. She's thinking there's no way that she will get anything on that pre-nup agreement.
I think you're probably right. I also think he may have done a round-robin of money on profits, using consultant fees and balance-sheet loan accounts to non directly controlled entities with carried forward losses, switching over different tax years.
Tax returns are good but the supporting financial statements and detailed general ledgers is what a forensic accountant needs to see in a tax audit.
As for Russian money or capital benefits, a non-Trump controlled US discretionary trust, that invests overseas, can possibly distribute trust profit re-characterised as non foreign......soooo, again, you need to see the detailed financial statements and general ledgers.
Let's wait and see what we get to see.![]()
Seems like odd behavior, paying a consulting fee for someone who is also your employee.
Here is the defense/deflection of this story that you will begin to hear:
“Now let’s see all those people in congress!”
“He already told us he doesn’t pay taxes because he’s smart!”
“Look at any billionaire’s tax returns and I’ll bet you you’ll see the same thing. Let’s see Bill Gates’/Jeff Bezos’/George Soros’ returns!”
“Don’t blame Trump; blame the tax system that lets him do this.”
“The NYT is fake news and has been caught fabricating stories in the past.”
So the NYT has given us the "eye opening revelation" (based on documents it hasn't disclosed) that Trump is no different to other 1 percenters. He has taken advantage of the complex tax laws to reduce his tax liability to practically nothing.
I'm shocked I tells you, SHOCKED!![]()
It shows that he has broken tax laws.