• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump's Second Term

Donald

Trump: They would’ve used it on us if we let them—if we waited any longer. If we didn’t hit within two weeks, they would’ve had a nuclear weapon. If we didn’t do the B2 attack a number of months ago, they would have a nuclear weapon.
First off, that's not a direct quote, it's splices of different parts of his statement. To present it as one continuous quote when it isn't is dishonest. Second, the two week timeline is for us to attack, it is not the timeline for them to get nuclear weapons. If you had read Rubio's interview in full, you would understand the logic of that claim. You can argue the claim is wrong, but you either don't understand or are misrepresenting what the claim is. Because it isn't that Iran was about to get nuclear weapons.
 
This is a lie

BREAKING: Following President Trump's threat to BAN ALL TRADE with Spain, the Spanish government has BENT THE KNEE, and is now cooperating with the US military

THAT'S how it's done!

Well done, 47!

Spain denies White House claim it agreed to cooperate with US military

Spain reiterates its opposition to war on Iran despite Trump’s threat of cutting off trade with the European country.

The Spanish government was quick to dismiss the assertion, with Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares saying that he denies the White House’s claim “categorically”.

“Not a single comma has changed, and I have no idea whatsoever what they might be referring to,” Albares told Hora25 radio programme.
 
Reporter: You listed a long list of grievances against the Iranian government going back to 1979. Why is it that you can't say what the imminent threat against the US was that required us to launch this?

Leavitt: I reject the premise of your question.

COLLINS: But Hegseth was complaining that it was front page news about these 6 service members who were killed

LEAVITT: That's not what the secretary said and meant and you know it. You know you are being disingenuous

COLLINS: He said, 'tragic things happen. It's front page news. I get it. The press only wants to make the president look bad.'

LEAVITT: The press does only want to make the president look bad. That's a fact. Especially you.


Donald had a feeling

Leavitt: The president had a feeling, again, based on fact, that Iran was going to strike the US

Granny panties is flailing a little these days.
 
I'm aware of the claim that the program was destroyed. I'm asking where the claim that they rebuilt it is coming from. It's not coming from that announcement.
Doesn't it ever bother you that every time you apologize for Trump, you are debunked? Have you not realized that Trump lies all the time and anything he says he will contradict, given enough time? Sometimes he'll contradict himself in the same sentence.
 
This is a lie

BREAKING: Following President Trump's threat to BAN ALL TRADE with Spain, the Spanish government has BENT THE KNEE, and is now cooperating with the US military

THAT'S how it's done!

Well done, 47!

Spain denies White House claim it agreed to cooperate with US military

Spain reiterates its opposition to war on Iran despite Trump’s threat of cutting off trade with the European country.

The Spanish government was quick to dismiss the assertion, with Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares saying that he denies the White House’s claim “categorically”.

“Not a single comma has changed, and I have no idea whatsoever what they might be referring to,” Albares told Hora25 radio programme.
Of course it's a lie, it's the thing this corrupt administration does best. You can tell they're good at it just by the way the cultists lap it up.
 
Last edited:
First off, that's not a direct quote, it's splices of different parts of his statement. To present it as one continuous quote when it isn't is dishonest. Second, the two week timeline is for us to attack, it is not the timeline for them to get nuclear weapons. If you had read Rubio's interview in full, you would understand the logic of that claim. You can argue the claim is wrong, but you either don't understand or are misrepresenting what the claim is. Because it isn't that Iran was about to get nuclear weapons.

Dude, what?? The claim CLEARLY was that Iran was going to have nuclear weapons imminently. That is a patent lie, or the suggestion that their program was "obliterated" was a complete lie.
Naturally, those of us not in the cult know full well that both statements are lies.
 
Dude, what?? The claim CLEARLY was that Iran was going to have nuclear weapons imminently.
No. You are parsing his sentence wrong. The two week deadline was for us to attack.

"If we didn’t hit within two weeks, they would’ve had a nuclear weapon."

This is the quote, and the correct parsing with correct comma placement. You are trying to parse it like this:

"If we didn’t hit, within two weeks they would’ve had a nuclear weapon."

This is the wrong parsing with the wrong comma placement.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom