In any case, there's a fundamental difference between not doing something and reversing something that was already done. Changing a "woke" policy, whether you agree or disagree with it, might change the way a thing is done. Doing away with DEI in hiring and admissions likely changes who is hired and who is admitted. The excuse always made for such changes is that "woke" policies produce an advantage for some that disadvantages others. You might be able to say that a sans serif font produces an advantage for certain people in their ability to read documents, but I would contend that such a change confers no disadvantage to anyone. Nobody actually needs serifs. If your dyslexic neighbor can read a document, this does not mean you cannot! You can argue that some policies should be dropped when a certain finite number of positions is available. That argument is crazily irrelevant when deciding how readable a document will be.