Not from what I have seen, they are all for it now.
Wanna bet that avatar of yours? The courts will decide and, likely, throw the case out.
Whats with you and betting avatars?
What's with your avatar? Are you advocating violence against our dear President? I'd better call the FBI immediately!
The dog-killer shows her stupidity again. But, of course, she shows that there is no shame in her. And 100,000,000 idiots believe that she won this encounter.
What I've discovered is the vast number of people living in the United States who have very little idea how their government works, what the Constitution says, how laws work, etc. This forum is not a typical cross section. I would wager that many non-Americans who contribute here actually have a much greater understanding of the U.S. constitutional order than quite a number of U.S. citizens. I'm astonished, however, at how many apparently well-educated individuals are parroting the administration's completely wrong ideas of such things as due process and habeas corpus. So on the one hand, quite a lot of people are ignorant of U.S. government principles. But on the other hand, quite a number of people seem very intent on making it sound like what they want it to be rather than what it really is. They can't all be Elon-bots.
Go ahead.
Just amazing. After defining HC as "a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country," and adding that "Lincoln used it," she then goes on to say that she "recognizes that the President...has the authority under the Constitution to decide if it should be suspended." Those are two entirely different and diametrically opposed views of Habeas Corpus- it's just not possible to reconcile them. The second, about the President's authority to suspend it (with, as Hassan pointed out, Congressional approval), is more correct. So saying that it's a right the President has while knowing it's one he can only suspend is either a very fluid stupidity or, more likely, an outright lie that she somehow thought she could foist on a room full of people who knew better.
As she is evidently saying he has the authority to suspend "a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country" (as she defined HC). Perhaps she is expecting those opposed to simply removing people from this country to get onboard with a suspension of HC. Never underestimate the ability of stupid people to posit the majority of others as even stupider than themselves.
It can persist as an edited sound bite for right-wing news outlets who can spin it as Sec. Noem schooling those woke liberal lawmakers on how the law is supposed to work.
Republicans ? Here ? Anyway .. republicans know without Trump there is no MAGA. They will carry his carcass on a stick if they need to.