• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Trump's Second Term

Blue Mountain said:
I can certainly see why you'd prefer to have Harry living in the States. But if I was to include this line in my listing I'd score it at -1 for the insult to Meghan. That was uncalled for.
Click to expand...
Although I am Kate fan rather than pro-Meghan; you are right. He shouldn't have picked on Meghan, it is misogynist and probably racist. like most women, I am far more judgemental about other women than men, who are inevitably going to be pathetic disappointments entirely dependent on a good woman to make something of them.
 
JayUtah said:
Wow, they really want a king, don't they?
Click to expand...
The striking thing in English history (which is the foundation of the US constitution), is that judges did exert power over the king. From the 15th century (tudor times) judges began to be independent of the crown. So this is immensely retrogressive beyond the nature of the King at time of the rebellion in the American colonies, to a mediaeval pre-tudor system.
sirhenrybrooke.me

The History of Judicial Independence in England and Wales

This essay has just been republished in the latest edition of the European Human Rights Law Review
sirhenrybrooke.me sirhenrybrooke.me
 
steenkh said:
It is dealing with something that would be better left to the individual sports organisations.
Click to expand...
The US funds sports organizations, and has a duty to determine and how it will spend those funds. Note that this doesn't impose any new rules on any sports organizations. In every other area of public and private life, it's considered entirely reasonable for the people paying for a thing to have a say in how that thing is managed, or else to withdraw their funding if they disagree with the management. Why should the US government be any different? Just because USAID was handing out money without oversight or accountability, that doesn't mean it's the norm, or that the NCAA should enjoy the same privileges.
 
theprestige said:
The US funds sports organizations, and has a duty to determine and how it will spend those funds. Note that this doesn't impose any new rules on any sports organizations. In every other area of public and private life, it's considered entirely reasonable for the people paying for a thing to have a say in how that thing is managed, or else to withdraw their funding if they disagree with the management. Why should the US government be any different? Just because USAID was handing out money without oversight or accountability, that doesn't mean it's the norm, or that the NCAA should enjoy the same privileges.
Click to expand...


Since the maga weirdoes lied about 50$ million dollars going to hamas, why should we believe them about anything. Once a liar, always a liar.


-
 
JayUtah said:
Indeed, no brain power beyond, "Yay, the Libs are crying." In any other context it would be obviously absurd for career employees to be perfunctorily evaluated by someone who a year ago had to ask permission to go to the bathroom.
Click to expand...
Reminds me of a certain banned member who rated things by how many liberal tears they produced.
 
theprestige said:
The US funds sports organizations, and has a duty to determine and how it will spend those funds. Note that this doesn't impose any new rules on any sports organizations.
Click to expand...
Why is it not a new rule to determine who can participate in which categories, and who can’t?
 
Elon wants to bring democracy to Judges

Fire the "worst ones" as decided by "elected bodies"

Elon Musk
@elonmusk

I’d like to propose that the worst 1% of appointed judges, as determined by elected bodies, be fired every year.

This will weed out the most corrupt and least competent.
Click to expand...
 
Trump during his Super Bowl interview:

Trump: "I'm gonna tell Elon very soon, like maybe in 24 hours, to go check the Department of Education. He's gonna find the same thing. Then I'm gonna go to the military. Let's check the military. We're gonna find billions, hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud and abuse."

"I think Canada would be much better off being a 51st state because we lose $200 billion a year with Canada, and I'm not gonna let that happen."

BAIER: When do you think families would be able to feel prices going down?

TRUMP: I think we're gonna become a rich-- look, we're not that rich right now. We owe $36 trillion. That's because we let all these nations take advantage of us.
 
Waltz on NBC

WELKER: Is Trump serious about planning to annex Canada?

MIKE WALTZ: Look, I think the Canadian people, many of them, would love to join the United States
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom