• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump's Second Term

Trump seeks $1.5tn for defence alongside domestic spending cuts

The White House is asking Congress to boost the US defence budget to $1.5tn (£1.1tn), a sweeping rise that would mark the largest expansion in military spending since World War Two.

It includes funding for the Trump administration's proposed Golden Dome missile defence system, as well as a boost in domestic production of naval vessels, including new Trump-class battleships.

The administration said it would pair the proposed increase with a call for cuts across domestic agencies, including eliminating some climate, housing and education programmes.

So basically Trump is saying that the largest, most advanced military in the world which has not had to fight a peer opponent since WW2 has been so exhausted by a month of bombing one relatively small country that it needs hundreds of millions of more dollars to keep running?
 
So basically Trump is saying that the largest, most advanced military in the world which has not had to fight a peer opponent since WW2 has been so exhausted by a month of bombing one relatively small country that it needs hundreds of millions billions of more dollars to keep running?
FTFY, not humorously but for real.
 
FTFY, not humorously but for real.
Of course, and I note that a big chunk of the extra money is earmarked for Trump boondoggles like his battleships that couldn't hit the water before the mid 2030s assuming the program doesn't go off the rails the way every other US Navy procurement program this century has. It seems the USA has created such an expensive war machine that it can't actually afford to deploy it without risking financial ruin.
 
So basically TrQump is saying that the largest, most advanced military in the world which has not had to fight a peer opponent since WW2 has been so exhausted by a month of bombing one relatively small country that it needs hundreds of millions of more dollars to keep running?
He's going to blame it on having to send so much aid to Ukraine, and his cult will believe him.
 
The fact is of course that Trump could get $100 trillion and it wouldn't replace the used ammunition and interceptors fast enough to matter.
 
The hatred of losers has been a pillar of his policy, and a criterion for the faith and loyalty of his followers. The more he loses, the more he is perceived as being capable of losing, every minion a potential Brutus. I would like to see him die in disgrace, but disgrace is likely beyond his capability. Loathing, however, is not, and my fond wish is that before he goes he burns with the realization of having become what he hates most of all.
Reminder time. Malignant narcissists tend to loathe themselves and much of their outward show and cruelty to others tends to be part of their defense mechanism to that.
 
I think that more GOP people mail in ballots than Dems. The older someone is, the more likely they mail in.
Did you miss the part where he is the one that determines who gets to have their ballots mailed in? His EO says only the list they create of "confirmed US citizens, elgible to vote" are allowed to vote throught the mail.
 
Of course you do, it's a cult.

Q: What are your thoughts on the current situation in Iran and how Congress has not approved that as a war?

Mitch McConnell: "I support what the president is doing. They've been at war with us for 47 years.”

Link
 
Did you miss the part where he is the one that determines who gets to have their ballots mailed in? His EO says only the list they create of "confirmed US citizens, elgible to vote" are allowed to vote throught the mail.
As they've made a big deal about in the past, they're honestly less concerned about controlling who votes than they are about controlling those who count the votes. This is rather brazenly one of the means of trying to control those who count the votes to change the count to favor them even more at the expense of Constitutionally-guaranteed voting rights to citizens.
 
So basically Trump is saying that the largest, most advanced military in the world which has not had to fight a peer opponent since WW2 has been so exhausted by a month of bombing one relatively small country that it needs hundreds of millions of more dollars to keep running?
You are an order of magnitude out thousands of millions; to be specific 15 thousand.

Like I have argued previously the problem isn't Europe spending too little on defence, it is the US spending too much on offence.
 
So basically Trump is saying that the largest, most advanced military in the world which has not had to fight a peer opponent since WW2 has been so exhausted by a month of bombing one relatively small country that it needs hundreds of millions of more dollars to keep running?
I should think a lot of that is restocking with the expensive munitions already expended rather than the cost of keeping going.

When you have the largest, most advanced military and you attack someone, you start with the clever, expensive stand-off munitions to take out key defences, then you can move in closer with shorter range weapons from your expensive, stealthy planes, and eventually you've worn them down so far you can fly over them with vulnerable old B-52s and drop cheap iron bombs on them. So a sustained campaign becomes cheap but it starts really really expensive.

Of course that doesn't mean you face no losses. Just sustainable losses while you do what you need to do. In this case unfortunately nobody knows what Trump needs to do, least of all him.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom