• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump's Second Term

Hegseth: You see, this is not 2003. This is not endless nation building under those types of quagmires we saw under Bush or Obama. It's not even close. Our generation of soldier will not let that happen again. And nor will this president who very clearly ran against those kinds of never ending nebulously scoped missions. Those days are dead. Instead, we're winning decisively with brutal efficiency, total air dominance, and an unbreakable will to accomplish the president's objectives.

 
Hegseth: You see, this is not 2003. This is not endless nation building under those types of quagmires we saw under Bush or Obama. It's not even close. Our generation of soldier will not let that happen again. And nor will this president who very clearly ran against those kinds of never ending nebulously scoped missions. Those days are dead. Instead, we're winning decisively with brutal efficiency, total air dominance, and an unbreakable will to accomplish the president's objectives.

So what you're saying, Kegsbreath, is that you'll 1/10 arse it and leave a fully functioning enemy behind who has every reason to attack you and assume everything will work out ok?

That's about your MO allright.
 
Hegseth: You see, this is not 2003. This is not endless nation building under those types of quagmires we saw under Bush or Obama. It's not even close. Our generation of soldier will not let that happen again. And nor will this president who very clearly ran against those kinds of never ending nebulously scoped missions. Those days are dead. Instead, we're winning decisively with brutal efficiency, total air dominance, and an unbreakable will to accomplish the president's objectives.

I fully believe they have no intention in building Iran back up. They are just going to blow up everything they can, declare victory, and leave. That way, the consequences will never come back to us. Right?
 
Trump speech in Republican even in Florida
-so much fun sinking Iranian navy
-listing great achievements after 2016
-he still thinks asylym seekers were "emptied from asylums" in their countries
-hottest country!
-ended green new scam, brought back clean coal
-Biden opened border so 25 million came in after 2021.
-must take over healethcare (repeal Obamacare or crash it with no funding)
- he pivots from voter ID to no trans athletes

I played the thing to 47 minutes where he starts talking about mail in ballots...and a 6 year old giving mom a voter Id. Is he talking about a 6 year old citizen that then get illegal mom registered?

 
Last edited:
Trump speech in Republican even in Florida
-so much fun sinking Iranian navy
-listing great achievements after 2016
-he still thinks asylym seekers were "emptied from asylums" in their countries
-hottest country!
-ended green new scam, brought back clean coal
-Biden opened border so 25 million came in after 2021.
-must take over healethcare (repeal Obamacare or crash it with no funding)
- he pivots from voter ID to no trans athletes

I played the thing to 47 minutes where he starts talking about mail in ballots...and a 6 year old giving mom a voter Id. Is he talking about a 6 year old citizen that then get illegal mom registered?

Right-wingers don't care about being accurate or even coherent. They just want small soundbites that their atrophied little brains can sort of memorize. And this mush brained, diaper filling, orange, bigoted pedophile can only speak in barely coherent soundbites.
 
Right-wingers don't care about being accurate or even coherent. They just want small soundbites that their atrophied little brains can sort of memorize. And this mush brained, diaper filling, orange, bigoted pedophile can only speak in barely coherent soundbites.
Yeah, that was obvious but I think his dementia got past the lines about the 6 year old somehow being involved in the SAVE act voting bit. I think he was trying to say that the 6 year old citizen got the mom to vote. Without saying that.

People have clipped that part out and posted about " 6 year old" being old enough.
 
Last edited:
I fully believe they have no intention in building Iran back up. They are just going to blow up everything they can, declare victory, and leave. That way, the consequences will never come back to us. Right?
Plus, when the Iranians fail to wrestle power from the priests, the bigots can use that to claim they didn't want democracy enough. 'We spent a fortune killing the ayatollah, and they chose to remain an islamist state! See, Muslims are evil!'
 
I think it's kind of funny that he's threatening not to pass anymore laws when any law that would get to his desk would be a Republican supported bill. Nothing is going to pass without their stamp of approval considering they are in charge of all levels of government right now.
 
Hegseth: You see, this is not 2003. This is not endless nation building under those types of quagmires we saw under Bush or Obama. It's not even close. Our generation of soldier will not let that happen again. And nor will this president who very clearly ran against those kinds of never ending nebulously scoped missions. Those days are dead. Instead, we're winning decisively with brutal efficiency, total air dominance, and an unbreakable will to accomplish the president's objectives.

Ah. The triumph of the will.

And these presidential objectives you're so ruthlessly dedicated to accomplish - any early hints of what those are going to be yet?
 
I think it's kind of funny that he's threatening not to pass anymore laws when any law that would get to his desk would be a Republican supported bill. Nothing is going to pass without their stamp of approval considering they are in charge of all levels of government right now.
Yeah seems like kind of an idle threat. Heck, it might even might even work to the Democrat's benefit...

"Pass the Save Act, or I will block all the horrible things the republicans were going to do".

Reminds me of the scene from Blazing Saddles, where the sheriff pulls a gun and takes himself hostage.
 
Let me know when you've uncovered the bribe.
For us normies, this kind of statement looks absolutely ridiculous. He's accepted bribes, publicly, while calling them gifts. For example, the airplane from Qatar. Just because he says it's not a bribe, doesn't mean it isn't a bribe. However, to you, it isn't a bribe because Trump said it isn't and everything Trump says and does is "perfect."
Maybe Trump's just playing 64-Dimensional chess. In fact, nobody can defend what Trump says in a principled way because he is utterly devoid of principle. The ad hoc Trump/retard-explainers (like Zig) will invariably look foolish, and maybe that's understandable if they're the Sec. of State, or the Sec. of War, or getting paid a lot of money. Otherwise, it reminds me of the old joke about the hunter and the bear: "Be honest, you didn't come here to hunt, did you?" I'm against most forum moderation, but maybe it's time to consider banning humiliation porn.
For us normies, we have a hard time with the kind of mental gymnastics that MAGA does. They write their cognitive dissonance in their posts and arguments while not acknowledging the contradictions. Why can they do this? Because, unlike the rest of us, they have no sense of shame or embarrassment. These are people that wore tampons on their ears and praised Trump for wearing diapers, after all.
 
For us normies, this kind of statement looks absolutely ridiculous. He's accepted bribes, publicly, while calling them gifts. For example, the airplane from Qatar. Just because he says it's not a bribe, doesn't mean it isn't a bribe. However, to you, it isn't a bribe because Trump said it isn't and everything Trump says and does is "perfect."

For us normies, we have a hard time with the kind of mental gymnastics that MAGA does. They write their cognitive dissonance in their posts and arguments while not acknowledging the contradictions. Why can they do this? Because, unlike the rest of us, they have no sense of shame or embarrassment. These are people that wore tampons on their ears and praised Trump for wearing diapers, after all.
It's like the story about the emperor's new clothes, except they have all actually convinced themselves the emperor isn't naked.

'Lemme know when you've uncovered evidence of the emperor being naked... No, he's actually wearing clothes in that photo, he said so.'
 
If you believe what Trump says, which I don't. Why do you believe it is not going to be his? Is it because he is so honest?
No, it's got nothing to do with me believing him. I believe it's not going to be his because it already belongs to the DoD. And Trump can't just lay claim to government property. No president gets to do that. And if they could, what difference would it make where that property originated before it was government property?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom